Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Problem Definition and Causal Loop Diagrams James R. Burns July 2008.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Problem Definition and Causal Loop Diagrams James R. Burns July 2008."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Problem Definition and Causal Loop Diagrams James R. Burns July 2008

3 Assignment  Complete exercise 12 and use VENSIM to create the CLD VENSIM cannot translate CLD’s into working simulations  Develop the CLD for your term project problem

4 Problem Definition  The wrong model for the right problem is disconcerting, but fixable  The “right” model for the wrong problem is disastrous

5 The Right Problem  The first order of the day  Requires discussion, dialogue, listening  “I feel your pain”

6 The right paradigm  Is this a dynamic problem?  Are there risk aspects to it?  Is it a resource allocation problem?  A scheduling/routing problem?  A cost minimization problem?  APPLY THE RIGHT PARADIGM

7 Dynamic problems  There is change over time  The changing character of the situation IS THE PROBLEM  The problem should be studied in aggregates  The problem does not have a significant stochastic component or complexion to it

8 Dynamical Models: Explicit, Ordinary Differential Equations

9 Start with descriptions of the following  PURPOSE Identify who the decision-maker(s) are and involve them in the model-building process  PERSPECTIVE  PROBLEM  MODE

10 What are we doing here????  Attempting to characterize, cope with and understand complexity Especially DYNAMIC complexity, but also to a lesser extent detail complexity  Inventing a physics for a system or process for which there exists no physics You get to become a Newton, a Liebnitz, a Galileo, an Einstein, a ….

11 WHY???  How many of you have ever used a model to make a decision or take an action?  All decisions/executive actions are taken on the basis of models all the time  Because mental models frame and color our understanding of the problem—forcing us to take a particular course of action  Mental models must be driven by more formal, refined and analytical models—causal models/simulation models

12

13 Uses to which these models can be put  What IF experiments—hands on experimentation  Decision making Planning Problem solving Creativity Out of the box thinking  Hypothesis testing  LEARNING

14 The Methodology once problem is identified 1.Find substance 2.Delineate CLDs, BOT charts 3.Submit these for outside scrutiny 4.Delineate SFD 5.Implement simulation in VENSIM 6.Submit for outside VALIDATION 7.Utilize model for policy experimentation

15 Find substance  Written material Books Articles Policy and procedure manuals  People’s heads Order of magnitude more here Must conduct interviews, build CLD’s, show them to the interviewees to capture this

16 Delineate CLDs, BOTs  Collect info on the problem  List variables on post-it notes  Describe causality using a CLD  Describe behavior using a BOT diagram

17 Submit these for outside scrutiny  We simply must get someone qualified to assess the substance of the model

18 Delineate SFD  Translate CLD into SFD

19 Implement simulation in VENSIM  Enter into VENSIM Perform sensitivity and validation studies

20 Submit for outside validation

21 Utilize model for policy experimentation  Perform policy and WHAT IF experiments Write recommendations

22 Key Benefits of the ST/SD  A deeper level of learning Far better than a mere verbal description  A clear structural representation of the problem or process  A way to extract the behavioral implications from the structure and data  A “hands on” tool on which to conduct WHAT IF

23 Places where failure can occur  You must have decision maker involvement If you are going to have an impact on their mental models, they must be involved in the model development process from beginning to end  Solutions to the model must be reality checked to see if in-fact they can become solutions to the problem

24 Causal Loop Diagrams [CLD’s]

25 Motivation: CLD’s are excellent for…  Capturing hypotheses about the structural causes of the dynamics  Capturing the mental models of individuals or teams  Communicating the important feedbacks you believe are responsible for creating a problem

26 Notation  Variables and constants called quantities  Arrows—denoting the casual influences among the quantities  Independent quantity—the cause  Dependent quantity—the effect

27 Quantities  Use nouns of noun phrases  Assert nouns and noun phrases in their positive sense

28 Example

29 The Connector  Also called “arrow,” “edge,”  Is always directed from a quantity to a quantity  Denotes causation or influence Could be proportional Inversely Directly Could be accumulative or depletive

30 Single-sector Exponential growth Model we considered  Consider a simple population with infinite resources--food, water, air, etc. Given, mortality information in terms of birth and death rates, what is this population likely to grow to by a certain time?  Over a period of 200 years, the population is impacted by both births and deaths. These are, in turn functions of birth rate norm and death rate norm as well as population.  A population of 1.6 billion with a birth rate norm of.04 and a death rate norm of.028

31 We Listed the Quantities  Population  Births  Deaths  Birth rate norm  Death rate norm

32

33 Using VENSIM TO CONSTRUCT CLD’s  Use the variable – auxiliary/constant tool to establish the quantities and their locations  Use the “arrow” tool to establish the links between the quantities  Use the “Comment” tool to mark the polarities of the causal edges (links, arrows)  Use the “Comment” tool to mark the loops as reinforcing or balancing

34 Experiments with growth models  Models with only one rate and one state  Average lifetime death rates  Models in which the exiting rate is not a function of its adjacent state

35 Example:  Build a model of work flow from work undone to work completed.  This flow is controlled by a “work rate.”  Assume there are 1000 days of undone work  Assume the work rate is 20 completed days a month  Assume the units on time are months  Assume no work is completed initially.

36 Solving the problem of negative stock drainage  pass information to the outgoing rate  use the IF THEN ELSE function

37 Causation vs. Correlation

38 Inadequate cause: Confusion

39 Validation of CLD’s  Clarity  Quantity existence  Connection edge existence  Cause sufficiency  Additional cause possibility  Cause/effect reversal  Predicted effect existence  Tautology

40 Simplified Translation of CLD's into SFD's

41 Motivation  In the current “environment” there are too many connection “opportunities” that confuse and invalidate models built by naive users  The conventional translation of CLD’s into SFD’s is not easy. We may need to distinguish between Senge-style CLD’s created for just the purpose of capturing the dynamics of the process from CLD’s intended to lead us to a SFD

42 More Motivation

43

44

45

46

47

48 Robust Loops  In any loop involving a pair of quantities/edges,  one quantity must be a rate  the other a state or stock,  one edge must be a flow edge  the other an information edge

49 CONSISTENCY  All of the edges directed toward a quantity are of the same type  All of the edges directed away from a quantity are of the same type

50 Rates and their edges

51 Parameters and their edges

52 Stocks and their edges

53 Auxiliaries and their edges

54 Outputs and their edges

55 STEP 1: Identify parameters  Parameters have no edges directed toward them

56 STEP 2: Identify the edges directed from parameters  These are information edges always

57 STEP 3: By consistency identify as many other edge types as you can

58 STEP 4: Look for loops involving a pair of quantities only  Use the rules for robust loops identified above

59

60

61

62 (all blank positions are zeros) dimensions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 15 16 17 5 CC/AA 1 6 AA/DD -1 7 AA/(BB.DD) 1 8 AA/ZZ 1 9 BB 1 10 CC 1 -1 1 11 CC\DD 1 12 DD-1 13 CC/DD -1 14 CC/(AA.DD) 1 15 ZZ -1 16 CC/AA -1 17 CC 1 -1 Fig 2. Square ternary matrix (STM) corresponding to causal diagram model D shown in Fig. 1. 1 AA 1 -1 1 2 AA/DD 1 3 I/DD 1 4 dimless 1 1

63 Conclusions  CLD translation involves identifying every quantity and edge as to type  A rule structure might help to prevent naïve users from committing structural/causal implausibilities  It would be possible to automate the translation of CLD’s into SFD’s if the CLD’s are well-formed and “robust.”

64

65

66 A single-sector Exponential goal-seeking Model  Sonya Magnova is a resources planner for a school district. Sonya wishes to a maintain a desired level of resources for the district. Sonya’s new resource provision policy is quite simple--adjust actual resources AR toward desired resources DR so as to force these to conform as closely as possible. The time required to add additional resources is AT. Actual resources are adjusted with a resource adjustment rate

67 What are the quantities??


Download ppt "Problem Definition and Causal Loop Diagrams James R. Burns July 2008."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google