Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byApril Hill Modified over 9 years ago
2
Problem Definition and Causal Loop Diagrams James R. Burns July 2008
3
Assignment Complete exercise 12 and use VENSIM to create the CLD VENSIM cannot translate CLD’s into working simulations Develop the CLD for your term project problem
4
Problem Definition The wrong model for the right problem is disconcerting, but fixable The “right” model for the wrong problem is disastrous
5
The Right Problem The first order of the day Requires discussion, dialogue, listening “I feel your pain”
6
The right paradigm Is this a dynamic problem? Are there risk aspects to it? Is it a resource allocation problem? A scheduling/routing problem? A cost minimization problem? APPLY THE RIGHT PARADIGM
7
Dynamic problems There is change over time The changing character of the situation IS THE PROBLEM The problem should be studied in aggregates The problem does not have a significant stochastic component or complexion to it
8
Dynamical Models: Explicit, Ordinary Differential Equations
9
Start with descriptions of the following PURPOSE Identify who the decision-maker(s) are and involve them in the model-building process PERSPECTIVE PROBLEM MODE
10
What are we doing here???? Attempting to characterize, cope with and understand complexity Especially DYNAMIC complexity, but also to a lesser extent detail complexity Inventing a physics for a system or process for which there exists no physics You get to become a Newton, a Liebnitz, a Galileo, an Einstein, a ….
11
WHY??? How many of you have ever used a model to make a decision or take an action? All decisions/executive actions are taken on the basis of models all the time Because mental models frame and color our understanding of the problem—forcing us to take a particular course of action Mental models must be driven by more formal, refined and analytical models—causal models/simulation models
13
Uses to which these models can be put What IF experiments—hands on experimentation Decision making Planning Problem solving Creativity Out of the box thinking Hypothesis testing LEARNING
14
The Methodology once problem is identified 1.Find substance 2.Delineate CLDs, BOT charts 3.Submit these for outside scrutiny 4.Delineate SFD 5.Implement simulation in VENSIM 6.Submit for outside VALIDATION 7.Utilize model for policy experimentation
15
Find substance Written material Books Articles Policy and procedure manuals People’s heads Order of magnitude more here Must conduct interviews, build CLD’s, show them to the interviewees to capture this
16
Delineate CLDs, BOTs Collect info on the problem List variables on post-it notes Describe causality using a CLD Describe behavior using a BOT diagram
17
Submit these for outside scrutiny We simply must get someone qualified to assess the substance of the model
18
Delineate SFD Translate CLD into SFD
19
Implement simulation in VENSIM Enter into VENSIM Perform sensitivity and validation studies
20
Submit for outside validation
21
Utilize model for policy experimentation Perform policy and WHAT IF experiments Write recommendations
22
Key Benefits of the ST/SD A deeper level of learning Far better than a mere verbal description A clear structural representation of the problem or process A way to extract the behavioral implications from the structure and data A “hands on” tool on which to conduct WHAT IF
23
Places where failure can occur You must have decision maker involvement If you are going to have an impact on their mental models, they must be involved in the model development process from beginning to end Solutions to the model must be reality checked to see if in-fact they can become solutions to the problem
24
Causal Loop Diagrams [CLD’s]
25
Motivation: CLD’s are excellent for… Capturing hypotheses about the structural causes of the dynamics Capturing the mental models of individuals or teams Communicating the important feedbacks you believe are responsible for creating a problem
26
Notation Variables and constants called quantities Arrows—denoting the casual influences among the quantities Independent quantity—the cause Dependent quantity—the effect
27
Quantities Use nouns of noun phrases Assert nouns and noun phrases in their positive sense
28
Example
29
The Connector Also called “arrow,” “edge,” Is always directed from a quantity to a quantity Denotes causation or influence Could be proportional Inversely Directly Could be accumulative or depletive
30
Single-sector Exponential growth Model we considered Consider a simple population with infinite resources--food, water, air, etc. Given, mortality information in terms of birth and death rates, what is this population likely to grow to by a certain time? Over a period of 200 years, the population is impacted by both births and deaths. These are, in turn functions of birth rate norm and death rate norm as well as population. A population of 1.6 billion with a birth rate norm of.04 and a death rate norm of.028
31
We Listed the Quantities Population Births Deaths Birth rate norm Death rate norm
33
Using VENSIM TO CONSTRUCT CLD’s Use the variable – auxiliary/constant tool to establish the quantities and their locations Use the “arrow” tool to establish the links between the quantities Use the “Comment” tool to mark the polarities of the causal edges (links, arrows) Use the “Comment” tool to mark the loops as reinforcing or balancing
34
Experiments with growth models Models with only one rate and one state Average lifetime death rates Models in which the exiting rate is not a function of its adjacent state
35
Example: Build a model of work flow from work undone to work completed. This flow is controlled by a “work rate.” Assume there are 1000 days of undone work Assume the work rate is 20 completed days a month Assume the units on time are months Assume no work is completed initially.
36
Solving the problem of negative stock drainage pass information to the outgoing rate use the IF THEN ELSE function
37
Causation vs. Correlation
38
Inadequate cause: Confusion
39
Validation of CLD’s Clarity Quantity existence Connection edge existence Cause sufficiency Additional cause possibility Cause/effect reversal Predicted effect existence Tautology
40
Simplified Translation of CLD's into SFD's
41
Motivation In the current “environment” there are too many connection “opportunities” that confuse and invalidate models built by naive users The conventional translation of CLD’s into SFD’s is not easy. We may need to distinguish between Senge-style CLD’s created for just the purpose of capturing the dynamics of the process from CLD’s intended to lead us to a SFD
42
More Motivation
48
Robust Loops In any loop involving a pair of quantities/edges, one quantity must be a rate the other a state or stock, one edge must be a flow edge the other an information edge
49
CONSISTENCY All of the edges directed toward a quantity are of the same type All of the edges directed away from a quantity are of the same type
50
Rates and their edges
51
Parameters and their edges
52
Stocks and their edges
53
Auxiliaries and their edges
54
Outputs and their edges
55
STEP 1: Identify parameters Parameters have no edges directed toward them
56
STEP 2: Identify the edges directed from parameters These are information edges always
57
STEP 3: By consistency identify as many other edge types as you can
58
STEP 4: Look for loops involving a pair of quantities only Use the rules for robust loops identified above
62
(all blank positions are zeros) dimensions 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 15 16 17 5 CC/AA 1 6 AA/DD -1 7 AA/(BB.DD) 1 8 AA/ZZ 1 9 BB 1 10 CC 1 -1 1 11 CC\DD 1 12 DD-1 13 CC/DD -1 14 CC/(AA.DD) 1 15 ZZ -1 16 CC/AA -1 17 CC 1 -1 Fig 2. Square ternary matrix (STM) corresponding to causal diagram model D shown in Fig. 1. 1 AA 1 -1 1 2 AA/DD 1 3 I/DD 1 4 dimless 1 1
63
Conclusions CLD translation involves identifying every quantity and edge as to type A rule structure might help to prevent naïve users from committing structural/causal implausibilities It would be possible to automate the translation of CLD’s into SFD’s if the CLD’s are well-formed and “robust.”
66
A single-sector Exponential goal-seeking Model Sonya Magnova is a resources planner for a school district. Sonya wishes to a maintain a desired level of resources for the district. Sonya’s new resource provision policy is quite simple--adjust actual resources AR toward desired resources DR so as to force these to conform as closely as possible. The time required to add additional resources is AT. Actual resources are adjusted with a resource adjustment rate
67
What are the quantities??
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.