1. (=“P B ”) (=“P C ”) (=“P B or C ”)

2. NEITHER B NOR C “SELECTED”…. BY EACH INDIVIDUAL ATOM !

4. “SUPERPOSITION” “interference term”

8. In quantum mechanics, if state 1 → state 1’ and state 2 → 2’, then superposition of 1 and 2 → superposition of 1’ and 2’. Here,B → cat alive C → cat dead superposition of B and C → superposition of “alive” and “dead”! i.e.ampl. (cat alive) ≠ 0 ampl. (cat dead) ≠ 0

9. averages to zero “interference” term

11. Is quantum mechanics the whole truth? How do we tell? If all “everyday-scale” bodies have the property that the interference term is randomized (“decoherence”), then all experimental results will be “as if” one path or the other were followed. cannot tell. So: must find “everyday-scale” object where decoherence is not effective. Does any such exist? Essential: -- difference of two states is at “everyday” level -- nevertheless, relevant energies at “atomic” level -- extreme degree of isolation from outside world -- very low intrinsic dissipation QM CALCULATIONS HARD! BASE ON: a) A PRIORI “MICROSCOPIC” DESCRIPTION b) EXPTL. BEHAVIOR IN “CLASSICAL” LIMIT X

13. PHYSICS OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY bosons fermions “Bose condensate” Fermi energy “Fermi sea” ↔ kT even

14. “di-electronic molecules” Cooper Pairs Pairing of electrons: In simplest (“BCS”) theory, Cooper pairs, once formed, must automatically Undergo Bose condensation! must all do exactly the same thing at the same time (also in non-equilibrium situation)

15. SUPERCONDUCTING RING IN EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FLUX: integer “flux quantum” h/2e Either all pairs rotate clockwise Or all pairs rotate anticlockwise Note: state with 50% and 50% strongly forbidden by energy considerations

16. “CIRCUMSTANTIAL” TESTS OF QM ALREADY DONE The experimental system of choice: Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) The two states of interest correspond to current of ~1 microamp clockwise (state +) or anticlockwise (state -) If we “look” at times t int we always find either + or – (experiment already done). In we don’t look, quantum mechanics predicts interference effects in the probability of getting (say) “+” at a later time t f. t int tftf titi

17. Josephson circuits Trapped flux Φ ext Bulk superconducting ring Josephson junction Φ ext ΔEΔE

18. Other systems where Quantum Mechanics has been tested in direction of “Everyday World” ~1200 ~5000 ~10 6 ~10 10 Where to go next?

19. (?)