1. The eSafety Initiative and the ARTEMIS Technology Platform Rosalie Zobel Director Directorate G - Components and Systems European Commission Directorate General Information Society and Media ICTs In Automotive Industry, Košice – Slovakia, 10 May 2006

2. eSafety Initiative: a multi-stakeholder platform Intelligent Car Initiative ARTEMIS: a Technology Platform in Embedded Systems Outline

3. Demand for transport will continue to grow: –+ 55% for goods –+ 36% for people in the period 2000 - 2020 Road accidents in Europe cause 40.000 fatalities and 170.000 injuries, at a estimated cost of 160 €B, or 2% of BNP European automotive industry produced some 17 million vehicles/year, with some 2 million people employed Automotive has the industrial sector with the highest level of RTD investment versus turnover ICT is the main driver for innovation The share of electronic systems, some 16% today, will further increase to about 25% by 2010 Trends

4. Forum Plenary: Platform for consensus among stakeholders High-Level Meetings with Industry and Member States defining strategy Working Groups: Solution-oriented, reporting to the Forum The eSafety Initiative The eSafety Initiative was launched in 2002 as a joint initiative of the European Commission, industry and other stakeholders. accelerate the development, deployment and use of Intelligent Integrated Safety Systems that use Information and Communication Technologies (ITC) in intelligent solutions, in order to increase road safety and reduce the number of accidents on Europe's roads.

5. Established in 2003 (more than 150 members representing all road safety stakeholders Aims at removing the bottlenecks to market implementation through consensus building among stakeholders and recommendations to the Member States and the EU There are eleven industry-led Working Groups that work on priority topics. It has produced a consistent number of valuable reports The Forum will ensure the links with parallel and complementary activities in the domain of intelligent transport systems. The eSafety Forum

6. eSafety Forum: The Active WGs 2006 Plenary Sessions HL Meetings Service Oriented Architectures Chairs: Implementation Road Map Chairs: H-J Mäurer – DEKRA Prof. R. Kulmala – VTT Steering Committee Chair: A. Vits – EC eSafety Support eCall Driving Group Chairs: M. Nielsen – ERTICO W. Reinhardt – ACEA Communica tions WG Chair: U. Daniel, Bosch Research and Technological Development WG Chairs: U. Palmqvist – Eucar G. Pellischek - CLEPA Active New User Outreach WG Chair: J. Grill – AIT/FIA International Cooperation WG Chair: J. Bangsgaard - ERTICO

7. Pan-European eCall: Why? Build on E112 Reduction of average response time to the accident: 50% in Rural Areas 40% in Urban Areas Reduction of accidents severity 15% in less severe medical category Annual lives saving Estimated to be over 2,000 in EU 15 Costs savings (exceed many times needed investments) ~ 21 billion Euro in 15 EU countries annually

8. i2010 & the Intelligent Car Initiative Smarter improve efficiency and safety. Safer prevent and mitigate the impact of accidents. Cleaner contributing to reduce polluting emissions Intelligent Car On June 1, 2005 the Commission adopted the initiative “i2010: European Information Society 2010 for growth and employment” The Intelligent Car is one of the i2010 Flagship Initiatives. The objective is to improve the quality of the living environment by supporting ICT solutions for safer, smarter and cleaner mobility of people and goods. … addressing environmental and safety issues arising from increased road use

9. Intelligent Car Initiative: Challenges 1. Congestion Costs amount to 50 billion €/ year 10 % of the Road network is affected daily by traffic jams 2. Energy Efficiency & Emissions Road transport consumed 83% of the energy consumed by the whole transport sector 85% of the total CO 2 transport emissions 3. Safety still over 40.000 fatalities and 1.4 million accidents in the EU cost represent 2% of the EU GDP Human error is involved in almost 93% of accidents

10. Intelligent Car: Objectives Objectives of the Intelligent Car Initiative 1.Coordinate and support the work of relevant stakeholders, citizens, Member States and the Industry 2.Support research and development in the area of smarter, cleaner and safer vehicles and facilitate the take-up and use of research results 3.Create awareness of ICT based solutions to stimulate user’s demand for these systems and create socio-economic acceptance

11. Intelligent Car: Structure The i2010 Intelligent Car Initiative will build on the work of the eSafety initiative and follow a three – pillar approach: (1) The eSafety Initiative and the (2) RTD in Information and Communications Technologies (3) Awareness raising Actions RTD in ICTs FP5, FP6, FP7 The eSafety Forum Awareness Raising Actions Intelligent Car Initiative

12. 2nd Pillar: The Research Programme FP7 ICT for Mobility Main action lines: Enhance performance of Active Safety Systems Further step in the development of truly Cooperative Systems (vehicle-vehicle, vehicle-road) Info-mobility services for persons and goods – a new step forward Field operational tests: Share objective data between key stakeholders: industry-operators-MS

13. The awareness pillar of the Intelligent Car Initiative will promote, active information dissemination to a wide audience: To raise drivers and policy maker’s knowledge about the potential of intelligent vehicle systems To stimulate user’s demand and create socio- economic acceptance To facilitate the deployment of mature technologies and systems in the initial phase of market penetration To encourage stakeholders initiatives supporting i2010 Third Pillar: Awareness Actions

14. Intelligent Systems: Expected Impact eCall if all vehicles were equipped by 2010: Reduction in fatalities between 5% and 15% Savings up to a maximum of 22 billion €. Reduced congestion times between 10% and 20% with additional cost savings of between 2 to 4 billion €. Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) only 3% of the vehicles equipped: save up to 4.000 accidents in 2010 Lateral Support with a penetration rate of only 0.6%, in 2010: save 1.500 accidents could be saved Better traffic management through improved software and real-time traffic data: reduce of up to 40% of traffic standstill and congestion

15. Launching of the Intelligent Car Initiative  more than 250 stakeholders  85 journalists & camera teams  400 registered  Commissioner Reding presented the Communication on the Intelligent Car Initiative  display of 24 “intelligent” vehicles equipped with safety features eight simulators illustrating the way such safety devices function Held in Brussels’ Autoworld Museum on 23 February 2006

16. Embedded systems: Facts & figures 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 198019902000 world population microprocessors+ PCs millions Strong growth: Annual growth rate: 10 % A smart phone contains millions of lines of code 18 of top 25 EU companies rely on embedded systems; they spend € 50 bn annually in R&D By 2010: Number of embedded components expected to grow to 16 billion worldwide Electronics account for up to 40% of a vehicle’s value

17. R&D Support is Fragmented 17 EU Competitiveness Council and EUREKA Ministers call for closer cooperation and more synergy between FP and EUREKA – Instrumental role for ETPs, JTIs Strategic Priority Embedded Systems within IST/FP6 – 58 M€ funding in Call 2 and 75 M€ in Call 5; also ES elsewhere in IST National/regional programmes – e.g. in NL: PROGRESS, ESI ICT cluster projects within EUREKA – ITEA (1999-2007): software-intensive systems; 3.2 B€ costs – MEDEA+ (2001-2008): systems on silicon; 4.0 B€ costs

18. Aim and scope To develop & drive a joint European strategy in Embedded Systems –R&D, educational and structural issues addressed To align fragmented R&D efforts along a common strategic agenda at European level To benchmark & link with relevant initiatives outside Europe ARTEMIS: Advanced Research & Technology in embedded intelligence & systems PARAD ES … they spend annually € 25 bn in R&D Partners 8 of the 25 top- ranked European companies are members in ARTEMIS … http://www.cordis.lu/ist/artemis/

19. Artemis Proposed Synergetic Approach 19 FP7 - regular instruments Via normal Calls for Proposals FP7 Focus on upstream part of SRA RTD cooperation in ICT theme Frontier research via ERC Marie Curie actions for training and mobility of researchers Research infrastructures for Centres of Excellence Joint Technology Initiative Long-term industry-led PPP Focus on downstream part of SRA RTD cooperation in ITEA/MEDEA- like programme and other transnational projects In-kind industry commitment (staff) EU contribution via common legal structure of Member States involved Synergy ARTEMIS Industry-driven long-term vision Common pan-European SRA Overall coordination and policy alignment in ERA Joint monitoring of projects and impact assessment of programmes

20. ARTEMIS Strategy Common objectives Sustainability Design efficiency Ease of use High added value Time-to-market Modularity Safety/security Robustness Competitiveness Innovation Cost reduction Interoperability

21. Artemis Governance Annual conference Mirror Group of Public Authorities Office WG Strategic Agenda WG Innovation Environment WG Research Infrastructure WG Funding Strategy Steering Board WG Support Secretariat Executive Board Rules of Procedure and Terms of Reference ensure openness, transparency and dissemination

22. ARTEMIS Suggested Funding Scheme 22 Transnational Project MS 7 5 MS5 10 MS6 45 MS4 12 MS3 15 MS23MS23 National Contributions EU contribution MS1 10

23. ARTEMIS: Towards a JTI Likely prerequisites for EU contribution –Concrete JTI objectives –Adherence to common pan-European ARTEMIS SRA by all stakeholders –Open, transparent and effective governance –Earmarked (multi-annual) budgets in participating States and industrial commitment –Harmonised/synchronised funding procedures between States –Legal structure, e.g. EEIG of national Public Authorities, able to receive and manage funding from the Community Potential benefits –Creates the critical mass needed to pursue the common ARTEMIS objectives –Gives incentive for Member States to provide more and better aligned funding –Exploits strengths of EUREKA and helps overcoming its weaknesses –Avoids national duplication of international programmes / procedures