1. Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP

2. Fall 2007 2 What is the MEAP? MEAP Fall Administration –Grades 3 – 9 English Language Arts, Grades 3 – 8 Mathematics, Grades 3 – 8 Science, Grades 5 and 8 Social Studies, Grades 6 and 9

3. Fall 2007 3 What is the MEAP? English Language Arts –GLCE coverage is limited by the fact that we use intact, authentic texts Mathematics –Core GLCEs are covered by 3 items –Extended and Future Core GLCEs are covered by one item each (spiraled across forms) –Future Core items are scored but do not count toward student performance levels

4. Fall 2007 4 What is the MEAP? Science –Benchmarks are covered over a 3-year period, to the extent possible Social Studies –Strands are covered in a fixed blueprint each year –Benchmarks are covered over a 3-year period, to the extent possible

5. Fall 2007 5 MEAP Performance Levels New Performance Level Descriptors for Fall 2007 – Level 1: Advanced – Level 2: Proficient – Level 3: Partially Proficient – Level 4: Not Proficient

6. Fall 2007 6 MEAP Performance Levels Level 1: Advanced –The student’s performance exceeds grade level expectations and indicates substantial understanding and application of key concepts defined for Michigan students. The student needs support to continue to excel.

7. Fall 2007 7 MEAP Performance Levels Level 2: Proficient –The student’s performance indicates understanding and application of key grade level expectations defined for Michigan students. The student needs continued support to maintain and increase proficiency.

8. Fall 2007 8 MEAP Performance Levels Level 3: Partially Proficient –The student needs assistance to improve achievement. The student’s performance is not yet proficient, indicating a partial understanding and application of the grade level expectations defined for Michigan students.

9. Fall 2007 9 MEAP Performance Levels Level 4: Not Proficient –The student needs intensive intervention and support to improve achievement. The student’s performance is not yet proficient and indicates minimal understanding and application of the grade level expectations defined for Michigan students.

10. Fall 2007 10 Progress Reporting Implementation of MEAP performance level changes – Fall 2006: Descriptive reports – Fall 2007: Evaluative reports

11. Fall 2007 11 Progress Reporting Fall 2006: Descriptive reports –Student transitions from one performance level to another from one grade to the next –Individual and parent reports and school aggregate reports

12. Fall 2007 12 Progress Reporting Fall 2007: Evaluative reports –Fall 2006 information –Performance level change for individual students:  Significant Improvement (SI)  Improvement (I)  No Change (N)  Decline (D)  Significant Decline (SD)

13. Fall 2007 13 Progress Reporting Fall 2007: Evaluative reports –Add for schools: Year-to-Year Transitions indicating percentages of students achieving each level of performance

14. Fall 2007 14 Types of Reports Individual Student Data –Parent Report –Individual Student Report –Student Labels –Class Roster –Student Data File

15. Fall 2007 15 Types of Reports Aggregate Data –Summary reports  School, District, State level  Feeder school reports –Demographic reports  School, District, State level –Comprehensive report  District, ISD level

16. Fall 2007 16 MEAP Parent Report Includes all MEAP subjects (reading, writing, total ELA, mathematics, science, social studies) Front cover –Scale scores –Current and previous year performance levels and performance level change # Science/social studies are not measured in every grade, so year-to-year progress cannot be reported. **The writing assessment is not long enough to precisely categorize students’ year-to-year progress.

17. Fall 2007 17 MEAP Parent Report Inside –Explanations –Strand and/or domain information –Graphical representations –Student Performance Level Change (math, reading, total ELA)

18. Fall 2007 18 MEAP Parent Report Expanded reports (Fall 2007) –Fall 2006 performance information plus… –Performance Level Change Significant Improvement (SI) Improvement (I) No Change (N) Decline (D) Significant Decline (SD)

19. Fall 2007 19 MEAP Reports

20. Fall 2007 20 MEAP Reports Report performance level change example : –Fall 2006 Performance: Mid Basic (level 3) –Fall 2007 Performance: High Proficient (level 2) –Performance level change: Significant Improvement (SI)

21. Fall 2007 21 MEAP Individual Student Report –Includes all MEAP subjects –Student demographics –Includes overall and specific MEAP scores Scale scores Performance levels – current and previous year Performance Level Change Sub-scores (e.g. domains, benchmarks) –Includes constructed response data Essay scores, condition/comment codes

22. Fall 2007 22 MEAP Individual Student Report Performance Levels –Current and previous year’s performance levels –Plus performance level change ( SI, I, N, D, SD)

23. Fall 2007 23 MEAP Individual Student Report

24. Fall 2007 24 MEAP Student Label Performance Level Change (Significant Improvement, Improvement, No Change, Decline, Significant Decline) may be included on labels beginning Fall 2007

25. Fall 2007 25 MEAP Class Roster Separate reports for each subject One line for each student Includes overall and specific MEAP scores –Scale score –Performance levels – previous and current year –Sub-scores (e.g. benchmarks, domains, GLCEs) Progress reporting –Performance levels previous & current year –Fall 2007 progress information plus performance level change (SI, I, N, D, SD)

26. Fall 2007 26 MEAP Class Roster

27. Fall 2007 27 MEAP Summary Report Includes all MEAP subjects aggregated to the school, district, and state levels Achievement summary (4 years of data) –Scale scores –Performance levels Performance level change –Summary –Year-to-Year Transitions

28. Fall 2007 28 MEAP Summary Report Summary reports also include one-year summary data on student progress –Student transitions (in performance levels) from one grade to the next –Fall 2006: Descriptive reports of transitions from one performance level to another in one grade to the next –Fall 2007: Performance Level Change (percent attaining SI, I, N, D, SD) Feeder school reports are the same as summary reports without the progress information

29. Fall 2007 29 MEAP Summary Report

30. Fall 2007 30 MEAP Comprehensive Report Includes all MEAP subjects aggregated to the district and ISD levels –One year summaries of scale scores and performance levels District summaries –One summary line for the entire district –A summary line for each school in the district ISD summaries –One summary line for the entire ISD –A summary line for each district in the ISD

31. Fall 2007 31 MEAP Comprehensive Report

32. Fall 2007 32 MEAP Demographic Report Includes all MEAP subjects aggregated to the school, district, and state levels One-year summaries of data on student performance –Scale scores –Performance levels Disaggregated by all NCLB reporting subgroups

33. Fall 2007 33 MEAP Demographic Report

34. Fall 2007 34 MEAP Demographic Report

35. Fall 2007 35 Student Data Files Where to find and download –OEAA Secure Site Student Test Scores Select Test Cycle –Report Type –Grade –ISD, District, School

36. Fall 2007 36 Student Data Files Where to find and download links for –Guide to Reports –Released Items –Score Categories and Scale Score Ranges –Student Data File Format

37. Fall 2007 37 Student Data Files Use file to create reports as desired Comma delimited file (CSV) will open directly into Excel –Student level data with Scale scores Performance level Raw score points Subject area strand points

38. Fall 2007 38 Presenter contact information Jim Griffiths Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting 517-373-4332 GriffithsJ@michigan.gov Sue Peterman Department Analyst, MEAP 517-335-1394 PetermanS@michigan.gov

39. Fall 2007 39 Program contact information Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability (877) 560-8378 OEAA@michigan.gov