1. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Chapter 15 Welfare economics David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics, 9th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2008 PowerPoint presentation by Alex Tackie and Damian Ward

2. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Welfare economics The branch of economics dealing with normative issues. Its purpose is not to describe how the economy works but to assess how well it works.

3. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Equity and efficiency Horizontal equity –the identical treatment of identical people Vertical equity –the different treatment of different people in order to reduce the consequences of their innate differences

4. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Pareto efficiency An allocation is Pareto-efficient for a given set of consumer tastes, resources and technology, if it is impossible to move to another allocation which would make some people better off and nobody worse off.

5. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Perfect competition and Pareto efficiency If every market in the economy is a perfectly competitive free market, the resulting equilibrium throughout the economy will be Pareto-efficient. As expressed in Adam Smith’s notion of the Invisible Hand.

6. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Competitive equilibrium and Pareto-efficiency At any output such as Q 1 *, the last film must yield consumers P 1 * extra utility. The supply curve for the competitive film industry (SS) is the marginal cost of films. Away from P 1 *, Q 1 *, there is a divergence between the marginal cost and the marginal benefit derived by consumers so a move to that position makes society better off. D SS D Q1*Q1* P1*P1* Quantity of films Price of films

7. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Market failure … occurs when equilibrium in free unregulated markets will fail to achieve an efficient allocation. Imperfect competition Social priorities (e.g. equity) Externalities Other missing markets –future goods, risk, information.

8. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Externalities An externality arises whenever an individual’s production or consumption decision directly affects the production or consumption of others … other than through market prices –e.g. a chemical firm discharges waste into a lake & ruins the fishing for anglers

9. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Externalities Negative Externality: Smoking, Pollution. Positive Externality: Education

10. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 A production externality Quantity Price D Suppose DD represents the demand curve for a product (which we may interpret as marginal social benefit). MPC MPC is the marginal private cost incurred by the firm in producing the good (assumed constant for simplicity). P Q The market clears where MPC = DD at price P and quantity Q. D

11. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 A production externality Quantity Price DD (MSB) MPC Q MSC If the firm causes pollution, it imposes costs on society, presented by marginal social costs (MSC). Q* So the social optimum is where DD(MSB)=MSC at Q*. The overall welfare loss to society from the market failure is given by the excess of MSC over MPC between Q* and Q.

12. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 A consumption externality DD(MPB) Quantity Price Q MPC, MSC As a consequence of a consumption externality MSB>MPB, and the free market equilibrium provides the quantity Q. MSB Q' As compared with the social optimum at Q', where MSB = MSC. E.g. neighbours may benefit from a well-kept garden. The brown area shows the welfare loss.

13. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Greenhouse gases

14. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Climate Change

15. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Kyoto Protocol Began 1997 By 2006 169 countries had signed, (not including the US) Turkey signed in 2009. BY 2012 emissions will be 5% lower than in 1990 Various schemes in place including carbon trading

16. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Kyoto Protocol Will End in 2012 International Conferences for a new protocol Copenhag 2009, Durban 2011 climate meetings Durban 2011: Countries will form their plans until 2015 and apply it by 2020.

17. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Is it worth it? Should China cut back today, to make the future better? Stern review suggests that cuts in carbon emissions will only cost 1% of GDP per annum. If we do not take precautions, then the cost of disasters due to the climate change are predicted to cost us 20% of the GDP.