1. 1 Naruki Wakabayashi Shimizu Corporation Tokyo Japan Study on the Jointed Rock Mass for the Excavation of Hyper-KAMIOKANDE Cavern at Kamioka Mine NNN07 Hamamatsu, Japan 3-5 October 2007

2. 2 Topics ・ Previous Geological Survey and Stability Analysis for the Hyper-K cavern ・ Site Selection ・ Isotropic Elastic FEM Analysis for the Investigation of Cavern Shape, Size and Type ・ Ongoing Investigation and Analysis for Jointed Rock Mass ・ Investigation of Joint Orientation ・ Obtaining In-Situ Rock Joints and Investigation of Joint Mechanical Properties ・ Pull-out Test of Two Types of Cable Bolt ・ Two Type Analysis to Consider the Influence of Joint and Support System

3. 3 Mozumi mine Tochibora mine Proposed Area Kamioka Mine Location Kamioka Mine Hamamatsu Tokyo Super-K Proposed Area in Mozumi Mine is about 10km South from the Super-Kamiokande. Site Selection

4. 4 Hyper-K proposed Site Hornblende Biotite Gneiss & Migmatite Biotite Gneiss Limestone ”ANKO” Fault ”240 ゜ - ME” Fault ”NAMARI” Fault Skarn Orebody Zone Core Boring ExistingTunnelSurveyed Geological Map of Proposed Site at Tochibora Mine Plan View of + 550mEL N Proposed Site Formation is Hornblende Biotite Gneiss and Migmatite. 100m

5. 5 Cylindrical Dome Larger than Super-K Huge Tunnel Comparison of the Hyper-K Cavern from Various View Points Two Parallel Tunnels Isotropic Elastic FEM Analysis Image Design of Two 250m Long Parallel Tunnels Spacing Offset ”NAMARI” Fault ”ANKO” Fault ”240°-ME” Fault

6. 6 Summary of Previous Study Site Selection : Tochibora Mine, +480mEL~+550m EL is the most appropriate location with very competent rock condition. Cavern Design: Two 250m Long Parallel Tunnels with Section of 2,076m 2 are capable of being safely excavated. This Type is possible to continue observation during Maintenance. Cavern Layout : Two Parallel Tunnels as above should be Located with 80m –100m (about 2 Diameter Distance) Spacing and 50m-100m Offset to avoid the poor Zone of Surrounding Faults. In Isotropic Elastic FEM Analysis of Previous Study, Young’s Modulus was empirically decreased as Jointed Rock Mass. It is Important and Necessary to Consider the Influence of Joint Orientation and Mechanical Properties Numerically.

7. 7 Analysis for Jointed Rock Mass Anisotropic Young’s Modulus Considering Joint Orientation and Mechanical Properties Composition of Elastic Blocks Surrounding Joints Equivalent Continuum Analysis Discontinuous Analysis Damage Tensor Crack Tensor Key Block Distinct Element Method (DEM) ・ Characteristics of Joint Orientation ・ Mechanical Properties of Joint and Rock Core ・ Mechanical Properties of Support such as Cable Bolt

8. 8 Investigation of Jointed Rock Mass Pull-out Tests of Cable bolt (6 Places) Obtaining Rock Joint (3 Places) +550m EL N Rock Classification B Very Good CH Good CM Medium Measurement of Joint Orientation in this Existing Tunnel Rock Types Gneiss Migmatite

9. 9 Investigation of Joint Orientation ・ Major Joint Set : Strike E-W and Dip ±70 ～ 90° ・ Another Joint Set : Strike NE-WS and Dip ±40 ～ 50° Projection of Poles Pole Density Contours Gneiss Migmatite N W S E N W S E N W S E N W S E N S W E Strike Dip Pole Joint ×

10. 10 Situation of Obtaining In-Site Rock Joints Recovered Core with Joint Diamond Drilling Joint

11. 11 ・ Joint Deformability Parameters such as Normal and Shear Stiffness, Dilatancy Angle ・ Joint Shear Strength such as Cohesion and Internal Friction Angle Normal Stress Shear Displacement Joint Mechanical Properties Direct Shear Test of Rock Joints Shear Test Equipment (Normal and Shear load are 1MN) Rock Joint Specimen with extensometers

12. 12 σn=10N/mm 2 Normal Stiffness =67N/mm 2 /mm Normal Displacement (mm) Normal Stress (N/mm 2 ) Di ｌ atancy angle=2.4° Shear Displacement (mm) Normal Displacement (mm) Normal Stress (N/mm 2 ) Shear Strength (N/mm 2 ) Cohesion=0.57N/mm 2 Internal Friction angle =33° Results of Direct Shear Test Shear Displacement (mm) Shear Stress (N/mm 2 ) Shear Stiffness=60N/mm 2 /mm Shear Strength

13. 13 Pull-Out Test of Two Type Cable Bolts Economical Support System should be used ・ Usual Support System for Large Cavern is Rock Anchor → Expensive ・ Proposed Support System is Rock Bolt and Cable Bolt → Economical ・ Special Cable Bolt with Dimples has very high Strength ・ Mechanical Properties of Cable bolt was estimated by Pull-Out Test Usual Cable Bolt without Dimples （ PC-Cable Bolt ） Special Cable Bolt with Dimples （ ST-Cable Bolt ）

14. 14 Situation of Pull-Out Tests PC-Cable bolt ST-Cable Bolt Jock and Dial Gauge Pressure Pump Diamond Drilling Inserting Cable Bolts Pull-Out Test Setting up Equipments

15. 15 Results of Pull-Out Tests ST PC Displacement (mm) Load (kN) Gneiss (B) ST PC Displacement (mm) Load (kN) Migmatite (B) Strength (kN/m) Stiffness (kN/m/m) ST PC □Gneiss (B) ◇ Migmatite(B) □Gneiss (B) ◇ Migmatite(B) △ Gneiss (CH) ○Migmatite(CH) △ Gneiss (CH) ○Migmatite(CH) PC Strength above 53kN/m Stiffness above 40MN/m/m ST Strength above 270kN/m Stiffness above 53MN/m/m Stiffness (kN/m/m) Strength (kN/m) Cable bolt model

16. 16 Mechanical Properties of Intact Rock CoreMigmatiteGneiss Compressive Strength (N/mm 2 )191176 Young’s Modulus (kN/mm 2 )60.464.3 Poisson’s Ratio0.240.26 Density (MN/m 3 )0.027 Mechanical Properties Properties for Analysis Rock Mass (Same as Intact Rock) Young’s Modulus=64.3 kN/mm 2 Poisson’s Ratio=0.25 Density=0.27NM/m 3 Joint Normal Stiffness=67N/mm 2 /mm Shear Stiffness=60N/mm 2 /mm Dairatancy Angle=2.4° Cohesion=0.57N/mm 2 Internal Frictional angle=33° ST-Cable BoltShear Strength= 270kN/m Shear Stiffness=53MN/m/m PC-Cable BoltShear Strength= 53kN/m Shear Stiffness=40MN/m/m

17. 17 Analysis Cases Support In-Situ Stress Case 1 Without Support Isotropic Stress σH=σv=14.4 （ N/mm 2 ） (Overburden:500m) Case 2 Rock Bolt (Length=6m :Space=2m) Double PC-Cable Bolt (Length=15m :Space=2m) Case 3 Rock Bolt (Length=6m :Space=2m) Double ST-Cable Bolt (Length=15m :Space=2m) Discontinuous Analysis by DEM DEM Analysis is Performed to Establish the Behavior of Jointed Rock Mass and the Effect of Support System. Cavern Direction is East and West Huge Tunnnel W48m×H54m 2070m 2 Cavern Shape and Direction Joint Strike

18. 18 200m Strike E-W Dip ±70 ～ 90° (Major Joint Set) Procedure of Analysis Establishing Support System after Each Excavation Step First Step Second Step Third Step Fourth Step Analysis Model 200m Strike NS-WS Dip ± 40 ～ 50° (Another Joint Set) Joints are Generated Statistically According to the Joint Orientation

19. 19 Displacement Vector and Cable Axial Force Case 3: RB+ST-Cable Bolt (Double) Displacement of Right and Left Side Wall are nearly same because of Symmetrical Joint Dip Angle (±70 ～ 90°). Displacement of Case-3 is smaller than Case-2 because of Support Effect of ST Cable Bolts Case 1 ： Without Support 89 17 15 93 17 45 67 13 15 41 10 35 60 13 15 37 10 32 284 464 415 （ kN ） 474 618 620 （ kN ） (mm) Case 2 ： RB+PC-Cable Bolt (Double)

20. 20 Equivalent Continuum Analysis by Crack Tensor Model X Z Cavern shape and Region (528m×528m ） 240m 48m 240 m 234m 54m Huge Tunnnel W48m×H54m 2070m 2 Crack Tensor Analysis is Performed to Estimate the Relation between Tunnel Direction and Joint Orientation. In-Situ Stress is Isotropic σH=σv=14.4 （ N/mm 2 ） Case 1:Cavern Direction is East and West, parallel to Joint Strike Case 2:Cavern Direction is North and South, right-angled to Joint Strike Case 1 Case 2 Joint Strike

21. 21 Displacement Case 1 Case 2 Joint Strike Side Wall Displacement of Case 1 is 2 times Larger than Case 2 because of influence of Joint Strike Direction.

22. 22 Summary Joint Orientation : At Proposed Site in Tochibora Mine, Major Joint Set Strike Direction is E-W and Dip Angle is ±70 ～ 90° Joint Properties : Normal and Shear Stiffness, Shear Strength are Estimated. Cable Bolt Properties : Shear Strength and Stiffness of ST and PC Cable Bolt are Estimated. Shear Strength of ST-Cable Bolt is 5 Times Higher than PC-Cable Bolt. ST-Cable Bolt is very Effective Support. Results of Analysis : Discontinuous and Equivalent Continuum Analysis are able to Estimate the Effect of Rock Support System and the Anisotropic Behavior of Jointed Rock Mass. Joint Orientation is very Important factor to decide the Cavern Direction. Further Investigation : It is Necessary for Estimation of Accurate Joint Orientation to investigate in Different Direction Tunnel or Bore Hole Additionally. Measurements of In-Situ Initial Stresses and In-Situ Tests on Rock Mass Deformability are indispensable.

23. 23 END