Download presentation
1
Temperament
2
Personality Test!
3
Outline What is temperament? 3 Approaches Stability of Temperament
Causes and Outcomes of Temperament
4
Defining Temperament Early emerging individual differences in characteristic patterns of emotional, behavioral, and motor responding (Rothbart & Bates 2006; Goldsmith, 1987; Calkins & Degnan, 2006) Generally considered to have a biological or genetic basis Generally stable across contexts and over time Foundation for later personality
5
Temperamental Characteristics
Negative emotionality Positive emotionality Behavioral inhibition Activity level Approach behavior Persistence Fearfulness
6
Temperament & Personality
Temperamental characteristics provide the early building blocks for personality Dimensions are correlated with Big Five personality characteristics Personality broader Beliefs, motivation, values
7
3 Approaches to Temperament
Multiple theoretical approaches to temperament These approaches vary: In number of temperament dimensions proposed Emphasis on emotion vs. behavior
8
Approach #1: Rothbart and Bates Approach
Two broad dimensions: Reactivity and Regulation (Rothbart, 2007; Rothbart & Bates, 2006) Measured along multiple dimensions that place emphasis on basic emotion, attention, and motor behaviors Create broad dimensions based on these basic components of temperament
9
Rothbart and Bates’ Dimensions
Temperament Dimensions Negative Emotionality Surgency Effortful Control Rothbart’s Dimensions
10
Negative Emotionality
Fear Anger Frustration Sadness
11
Negative Affectivity (Reactivity)
Dimension Definition Frustration Amount of negative affect related to interruption of ongoing tasks or goal blocking. Fear Amount of negative affect, including unease, worry or nervousness related to anticipated pain or distress and/or potentially threatening situations. Sadness Amount of negative affect and lowered mood and energy related to exposure to suffering, disappointment and object loss. Discomfort Amount of negative affect related to sensory qualities of stimulation, including intensity, rate or complexity of light, movement, sound, texture. Soothability Rate of recovery from peak distress, excitement, or general arousal. Putnam & Rothbart, 2006
12
High Intensity Pleasure
Surgency Activity Level Approach High Intensity Pleasure Impulsivity
13
Exuberance/Surgency (Reactivity)
Dimension Definition Activity Level Level of gross motor activity including rate and extent of locomotion. Approach Amount of excitement and positive anticipation for expected pleasurable activities. Smiling and Laughter Amount of positive affect in response to changes in stimulus intensity, rate, complexity, and incongruity. Shyness (low) Slow or inhibited approach in situations involving novelty or uncertainty. High Intensity Pleasure Amount of pleasure or enjoyment related to situations involving high stimulus intensity, rate, complexity, novelty and incongruity. Impulsivity Speed of response initiation. Putnam & Rothbart, 2006
14
Effortful Control Low Intensity Pleasure Attentional Control
Perceptual Sensitivity Inhibitory Control
15
Effortful Control (Regulation)
Dimension Definition Attentional Focusing Tendency to maintain attentional focus upon task-related channels. Inhibitory Control The capacity to plan and to suppress inappropriate approach responses under instructions or in novel or uncertain situations. Low Intensity Pleasure Amount of pleasure or enjoyment related to situations involving low stimulus intensity, rate, complexity, novelty and incongruity. Perceptual Sensitivity Detection of slight, low-intensity stimuli from the external environment. Putnam & Rothbart, 2006
16
Individual Differences in Regulation
Children’s ability to mask disappointment Two things to keep in mind: There are no methodological controls This is not a good parenting strategy Jimmy Kimmel YouTube Challenge (WARNING: Some inappropriate language)
17
During everyday activities, how often did your child…
Pay attention to you right away when you called to him/her? Seem to be irritated by tags in his/her clothes? Become bothered by sounds while in noisy environments? Seem full of energy, even in the evening? ECBQ; Rothbart & colleagues
18
Let’s evaluate the children’s temperament.
Matthew Exasperating! Kai Apparently © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
19
Match Temperament Factors to Big Five!
Negative Affectivity Surgency Effortful Control Openness to Experience Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
20
Gender Differences? Exuberant – Surgency Negative Affectivity
(Extraversion) Negative Affectivity (Neurotiscism) Effortful Control (Conscientousness)
21
Approach #2: Thomas & Chess
Temperament Description Activity Is the child always moving and doing something OR does he or she have a more relaxed style? Rhythmicity Is the child regular in his or her eating and sleeping habits OR somewhat haphazard? Approach / withdrawal Does he or she "never meet a stranger" OR tend to shy away from new people or things? Adaptability Can the child adjust to changes in routines or plans easily or does he or she resist transitions? Intensity Does he or she react strongly to situations, either positive or negative, OR does he or she react calmly and quietly? © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
22
Approach #2: Thomas & Chess
Temperament Description Mood Does the child often express a negative outlook OR is he or she generally a positive person? Does his or her mood shift frequently OR is he or she usually even-tempered? Persistence and Attention Span Does the child give up as soon as a problem arises with a task OR does he or she keep on trying? Can he or she stick with an activity a long time OR does his or her mind tend to wander? Distractibility Is the child easily distracted from what he or she is doing OR can he or she shut out external distractions and stay with the current activity? Sensory Threshold Is he or she bothered by external stimuli such as loud noises, bright lights, or food textures OR does he or she tend to ignore them? © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
23
Video © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood (40%) Easy
Positive mood, high regularity, low intensity, adaptability, approach (not withdrawal) Difficult (10%) Negative mood, irregularity, extreme intensity, slow to adapt, withdrawal, loud crying/laughter Slow to warm-up (15 %) Low activity, withdrawal, slower to adapt, somewhat negative mood, low intensity Video © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
24
What about the other 35% The other children in Thomas and Chess’s (1977) study could not be classified: Displayed characteristics in a different configuration Were not consistent in the types of behaviors they displayed across different situations or over time
25
Approach #3: Behavioral Inhibition (Kagan)
Perspective focuses on two types of temperament: Inhibited and uninhibited Thought to represent distinct approach vs. withdrawal tendencies to new situations and people
26
Behavioral Inhibition
Inhibited The tendency to withdraw from unfamiliar people and situations. Shy can also be fearful. Uninhibited Do not withdraw in unfamiliar situations and with unfamiliar people (Exuberant – approach oriented)
27
Behavioral Inhibition: Stability
Infant Temperament Distressed babies are more likely to be______ Calm babies are more likely to be____________
28
Is temperament stable? Rank-Order Stability Mean-Level Change
Personality Coherence © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
29
Rank-Order Stability: Surgency, NA, and EC
ICBQ (1981; 3-12 months) 3-month stability; increases with time ECBQ (2006; 1.5 – 3 years) r = .45 to .80 CBQ (2006; 3 to 8 years) r = .63 to .73 © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
30
(Roberts and DelVecchio, 2000). Note. Big Five
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
31
Is personality stable? Rank-Order Stability Mean-Level Change
Personality Coherence © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
32
(Lamb et al., 2002) © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
33
(Roberts, Walton, & Viechtbauer, 2006)
© 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
34
Big Five – Mean Level Change
ES and C Increase with age, then declines in old age Agreeableness Increases or remains stable with age Extraversion Social vitality/liveliness decreases with age Social dominance increases with age Openness to Experience Curvilinear © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
35
Is personality stable? Rank-Order Stability Mean-Level Change
Personality Coherence © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
36
Personality Coherence
Traits are stable over time. But, how people express the trait can change over time. Example: Mischel’s Marshmallow Study Trait = Delay of gratification © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
37
Personality Coherence: Delay of Gratification
TED 4- and 5-year old children 15 minutes: total time ≈ 9 minutes: Avg time before ate marshmallow 11-year follow-up at ages 15/16 © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
38
Personality Coherence: Delay of Gratification
11-years later (ages 15/16) 36 years later (40s) Higher SAT scores & GPA Lower BMIs Less drug use Higher self-esteem Better regulation of stress Greater self-control Better performance on self-control task Brain Patterns Low-delayers: ventral striatum High-delayers: prefrontal cortex But, depends on predictability of environment! © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
39
↑ Openness to Experience
Childhood Measure Adulthood Outcomes ↑ Extraversion Positive Relationships (Peer, Romantic) Aggression, Well-being ↑ Neuroticism Social Difficulties Lower occupational attainment in adulthood ↑ Conscientiousness Academic Achievement in childhood and adulthood Career success (income / occupational status), job satisfaction Positive Relationships ↑ Agreeableness Positive Peer Relationships Greater academic achievement and work competence Reduced delinquency ↑ Openness to Experience Academic achievement and IQ, Creativity © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood
40
Temperament Moderately Stable
Correlations over time range between .35 to .70 More variability in infancy and greater stability after 2 years of age Temperamental traits in infancy similar to traits when children were 7 years of age High approach tendencies at 3-years-old people rated themselves as more impulsive, spontaneous, and careless when they were 18 years of age
41
Causes and Outcomes of Temperament
Genetics Biological Factors Internalizing/Externalizing Problems Socioemotional Outcomes Peer Relationships Goodness-of-Fit
42
Big Five: Genetics or Environment?
rMZ rDZ h2 c2 e2 Self-report .54 .27 .46 Observer-report .45 .20 .50 -.05 .55 Average of Self and Observer Reports .65 © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood (GOSAT; Borkenau et al., 2001)
43
Typical correlations of personality trait levels between relatives of various kinds
Type of relative Correlation Identical twins raised together .45 Identical twins raised apart Fraternal twins raised together .20 Nontwin biological siblings raised together Parent and biological child (together) Parent and biological child (apart) Adoptive siblings Adoptive parent and child Note. Averages across different traits and different samples of persons. © 2015 M. Guthrie Yarwood Table adapted from Ashton (2013)
44
Biological Factors Dopamine Serotonin Norepinephrine – Neuroticism
Extraversion, Openness Serotonin Conscientiousness, Agreeableness Neuroticism (Low Serotonin) Norepinephrine – Neuroticism Testosterone Extraversion Agreeableness (Low T) Oxytocin - Agreeableness
45
Internalizing and Externalizing Problems
Children who are more irritable, difficult, impulsive, and emotional experience a higher rate of problems in later life Fearful, shy children → Internalizing problems Childhood behavior problem in which the behavior is directed at the self rather than others, including fear, anxiety, depression, loneliness, and withdrawal Poor effortful control → Externalizing problems childhood behavior problem in which the behavior is directed at others, including hitting, stealing, vandalizing, and lying What might contribute to these associations?
46
Socioemotional Outcomes
High Surgency/High Effortful control Children more likely to explore environment High Surgency / Low Effortful Control More likely to exhibit high levels of externalizing behavior problems High Negative Emotionality / Low EC Linked to externalizing and internalizing behavior problems & lower social competence
47
Peer Relationships In general, temperament has been found to influence peer relationships Inhibition predicts withdrawal from peers Lower peer acceptance Higher negative emotionality High activity Low persistence
48
Goodness-of-Fit Child’s Adjustment = Child’s temperament PLUS match b/w temperament and environment. Development is optimized when parents’ child-rearing practices are sensitive to the child’s temperamental characteristics
49
Goodness-of-Fit Situational Characteristics Parenting Child
Temperament Parenting
50
Goodness-of-Fit Children high on negative affectivity who have parents who are sensitive more likely to have better adaptation. Toddlers high on behavioral inhibition are less likely to exhibit later shyness if their parents are not overprotective or insensitive BBC Video (1:35)
51
Summary Children exhibit a narrower range of emotions and temperaments
As children age, they experience more emotions and express broader personality traits Temperament is caused by genetics, nonshared environ, and biology
52
Have a good day!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.