Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlban Cameron Modified over 8 years ago
1
Techniques in Valve-in-Valve TAVR Vinod H. Thourani, MD Professor of Surgery and Medicine Chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory Hospital Midtown Co-Director: Structural Heart and Valve Center Emory University School of Medicine AATS April 2015
2
Disclosures Edwards Lifesciences –Research, consulting St. Jude Medical –Research, consulting Boston Scientific –Research Medtronic –Research Jenavalve –Research Abbott Medical –Research, consulting Apica Cardiovascular –IP, co-founder
3
Bioprosthetic Valves Dvir D et al: JAMA 312:162-170, 2014
4
The Valve-in-Valve App Ideal positioning with 15% of XT stent below lowest visible margin of Perimount stent. The 23 mm XT stent is 14 mm tall at nominal diameter (shorter than the Perimount stent, which is 15 mm tall).
5
Main issues Aortic-valve-in-valve procedures Malpositioning Ostial coronary occlusion Residual stenosis
6
Device Malpositioning P= 0.04 StentlessStented- Mosaic Stented- Non-Mosaic Dvir D et al: JAMA 312:162-170, 2014
7
Stented (n=441) Stentless (n=112) P Aortic regurgitation ≥+2 (%)4.68.40.28 Aortic valve area (cm2)1.42 ± 0.431.73 ± 0.670.003 Aortic valve max gradient (mmHg)30.4 ± 14.322 ± 11.9<0.001 Aortic valve mean gradient (mmHg) 16.9 ± 911.7 ± 7<0.001 LVEF (%)52.1 ± 11.449.3 ± 12.20.047 Post procedure Echo Results Dvir D et al: JAMA 312:162-170, 2014
8
VIVID Registry 1-Yr Outcomes All (n=459) Stenosis (n=181) Regurg (n=139) Combined (n=139) P Death, #, % 62 (16.8) 34 (23.4) 10 (8.8) 18 (16.1) 0.01 NYHA FC I/II I/II 163 (86.2) 62 (84.9) 46 (85.2) 55 (88.7) 0.34 III/IV III/IV 26 (13.8) 11 (15.1) 8 (14.8) 7 (11.3) 0.34 AVA, mean (SD), cm 2 1.38 (0.42) 1.28 (0.29) 1.51 (0.48) 1.36 (0.45) 0.01 AV max grad, mean (SD), mmHg 30 (14.7) 32.3 (14.9) 25.2 (15.4) 32.1 (12.5) 0.005 AV mean grad, mean (SD), mmHg 16.9 (9.1) 18.3 (9.5) 13.8 (8.9) 18.4 (8) 0.001 30% AR Dvir D et al: JAMA 312:162-170, 2014
9
Patient LW 83 YO F with severe stenosis of a 21 mm Edwards Perimount bioprosthetic AoV (1999) and NYHA IV heart failure symptoms. Height 152 cm Weight 60 kg Creatinine 0.77 mg/dL – Ovarian CA on active chemo – Paroxysmal AF on warfarin – Dyslipidemia/HTN – Hypothyroidism – Moderate COPD: FEV1 = 0.95 L (60 %) – LVEF 60 % Proposed Comm TF V-in-V STS 15%
10
Patient LW LVOT 20.2 mm AVA 0.51 cm 2
11
Patient LW
12
RCALCA
13
LAO 19, caudal 10 Patient LW
14
May need glide wire May need to pace
15
Patient LW
18
Conclusions The field of valve-in-valve for failed surgically placed bioprosthesis is expected to increase The proper configuration for placement of the TAVR valve remains controversial Long-term results for this procedure are not known The standard of care remains surgical redo valve replacement in low-, and medium-risk and some high-risk patients
19
Thank you. Vinod H. Thourani, MD vthoura@emory.edu
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.