1. Analysis for March,2015 BGPI HSSE Department Monthly HSSE Performance

2. 1.Statistics 2.Incidents and Analysis 3.RWP Analysis Contents

3. 1. Statistics Monthly Proactive Indicators Land & TZMarine HSSE Inspections/Audits/Visits248367 Emergency Drills6041 Meetings7663760 Percentage of RWP Completed81%76% Trainings324211331 Hazard Reporting3966185 Unsafe Acts-UA156017 Unsafe Conditions-UC2406168 Near Misses51 First Aid Cases – FAC141

4. Monthly Reactive Indicators 1. Statistics Land & TZMarine Fatalities – FAT00 Permanent Total Disability-PTD00 Permanent Partial Disability-PPD00 Lost Work Day Cases-LWC00 Restricted Work Cases – RWC00 Medical Treatment Cases -- MTC01 Damage-DAM01 Fire/Explosion00 Security Incidents -SEC00 Environmental Incidents -ENV00 Health Case ( Medevac to hospital)00 Road Transport Accident-RTA20

5. 1. Statistics Other Indicators Land & TZMarine Exposure Hours 4,299,152 213,984 Kilometers Driven2,857,1170 Total Recordable Cases Frequency (monthly)-TRCF0.000 Lost Time Injury Frequency (monthly)-LTIF00 Motor Vehicle Accident Frequency (monthly)MVAF0.700

6. 1. Statistics Total Man-hoursFARLTIFTRCF 13,901,308 0.0 0.29

7. 1. Statistics Total Man-hoursFARLTIFTRCF 13,901,308 0.0 0.29

8. 1. Statistics MonthJanFebMarTotal MTC2103 RWC1001 LTI0000 TRC3104 RTA0022

9. 1. Statistics Total Man-hoursFARLTIFTRCF 613,656 0.0 1.63

10. 1. Statistics BGP HSE Performance of 2015 (Accumulated) -Marine Total Man-hoursFARLTIFTRCF 613,656 0.0 1.63

11. 1. Statistics BGP Motor Vehicle Accident Analysis of 2015 (Monthly)-Land & TZ Total Km drivenMVAF TargetMVAF 8,971,797 0.600.22

12. 1. Statistics BGP Motor Vehicle Accident Analysis of 2015 (Accumulated)-Land & TZ Total Km drivenMVAF TargetMVAF 8,971,797 0.600.22

13. 1. Statistics

15. 2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Congo (Crew 9811)Wing WahMarch 6, 2015RTA Brief description of incident At about 14:00 on March 6, 2015, one mechanical crew’s pickup (T37) from crew 9811 went back to camp after completing a field repairing work. Before the pickup passing a T- junction, one local truck coming from opposite direction turned left suddenly to the soil road of the T-junction without applying indicators and blocked the way of T37 fully. The driver of T37 used brake immediately, but the short distance (only 15m) was not enough to stop the pickup completely. Finally, the pickup collided on the rear right side of the local truck. After investigation, the traffic policemen judged that the local truck was full responsibility. No injuries happened in both vehicles. The front part of T37 was distorted. The rear right side of local truck was cracked and scratched slightly. The total estimated loss of T37 was about 2000USD.

16. 2. Incidents and Analysis The sketch of the incident Sketch 2 The front part of T37 The rear part of the local truck

17. 2. Incidents and Analysis Causes: The local truck turn left suddenly and occupied the driving lane of T37. The indicator of the local truck was not work. The light rain cause the road was slippery. T37 driver didn’t reduce speed before passing the T-junction. Both of the two drivers are lack of defensive driving awareness. Lessons Learned : Be alert with the local drivers’ unsafe behaviors. Reduce the speed before T-junction. Observe the MOPO procedure while driving in special weather. Improve the defensive driving awareness of the crew drivers.

18. 2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Iraq South (GIS)BPMarch 19, 2015RTA Brief description of incident At 11:53 on March 19, one subcontractor’s Toyota pickup working for BGP GIS project drove 62km/h on the blacktop road with two surveyors. One local blue water tanker from the opposite direction turned to left lane suddenly and rushed toward the Toyota pickup. In order to avoid collision, the pickup driver turned right emergently, which cause the pickup to roll over out of the road. After the accident, the local tanker was escaped. No injuries happened for the driver and passengers. The windscreen was broken, one tyre was flat and the rear-view mirrors were damaged. The total estimated loss was about 2400USD.

19. 2. Incidents and Analysis The sketch of the incident The incident scene The pickup

20. 2. Incidents and Analysis Causes: The local tanker turned to left suddenly without any indicators. The GIS pickup driver didn’t respond properly. The GIS pickup driver was lack of the defensive driving awareness to the local truck. The crew didn’t test or assess the driving skill of the subcontractor drivers. Lessons Learned : Be alert with the local drivers’ unsafe behaviors on the main road. Improve the drivers to emergency response capability depending on the potential cases. Test or assess the competence of the drivers from the subcontractors. The subcontractor’s drivers should receive DDC training as well.

21. 3. RWP Analysis

31. Thank you for your effort and contribution to HSSE! HSSE is the responsibility of all of us!