1. LOGO Credit Ranking System Supervisor: Mr. QuangLT

2. Contents Introduction – 15 min 1 Development process – 30 min 3 Demo – 10 min 4 Q&A – 30 min 5 Plan – 5 min 2 Credit Ranking System 2

3. GROUP INTRODUCTION Project name: Credit Ranking System Supervisor: Mr. Quang LT Students: - Đào Mai Ly - Trần Thị Hương Giang - Phạm Thị Phương Thảo - Phan Lê Quang Chính - Nguyễn Thanh Long Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System 3

4. Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT Business customer Individual customer Credit Ranking Banking Financial Index Non Financial Index Business Scale........ Basic Index Collateral Index........ Finance Deposit Others AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC CC C D Evaluation Ranks Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 4

5. PRESENTATION VIEW-POINT Follow process groups: Requirements => Integration Testing Each process contains 2 two parts: group working method and result Quality assurance follows all the processes Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 5

6. Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT Ranking Customer Info Customer Rank InputProcessOutput Business Process conclusion Clustering Classifying Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 6

7. Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT THE TWO APPROACH OF RANKING CREDIT AAA CC BBB Customer OLD SOLUTIONNEW SOLUTION Fixed! Flexible Data mining Clustering techniqueSimple technique Credit Ranking System 7

8. Role Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System 8

9. Project Plan Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System 9

10. Time table Result Quality Assurance Project management Deploy Integration test Implement Create TC DD Review Quality Assurance Project management DB & AD Require ment Feasibil ity study Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan DecJanFebMarAprNovOct Credit Ranking System 10

11. Result Quality Assurance Project management Acceptance testSystem testIntegration testUnit testRequirementsHigh-level designDetailed designImplement DevelopingTesting Plan for Test strategy follows V-model Credit Ranking System 11 Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Reason: Simple and familiar model Report submitting schedule

12. Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 12

13. Cross-Review method Result Quality Assurance Project management SRS & DD review: cross-review between 2 teams Code review: Person who designed the module will review code for this module -> form a review circle. LongGiangThảoLyChính Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Advantages: Review from different view-point All member can understand what others is doing All members can understand the whole system Credit Ranking System 13

14. Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process – Issue management Credit Ranking System 14

15. Working process – Task management Result Quality Assurance Project management Credit Ranking System 15

16. Result Quality Assurance Project management Working process – Bug management Credit Ranking System 16

17. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Elicitation Validation Analysis & Negotiation Documenting BSN | FI NFI | INV | SYS |RNK |RPT Credit Ranking System 17

18. Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT CREDIT RANKING PROCESS FOR BUSINESS CUSTOMERS Receive request ranking Collect customer information Identify customer’s industry operation Marking for Financial Indexes Marking for Non-Financial Indexes Calculate total score Summary Evaluation Credit staff Credit dept manager Risk managing staff Risk dept manager Branch Director Request for updating Committing Result Validation Evaluation Verified Accepted Credit Ranking System 18

19. Result Quality Assurance Project management BUSINESS CONTEXT CREDIT RANKING PROCESS FOR INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS Receive request ranking Collect customer information Marking for Basic information Marking for Other information Calculate total score Summary Evaluation Credit staff Credit dept manager Risk managing staff Risk dept manager Branch Director Request for updating Committing Result Validation Evaluation Verified Accepted Credit Ranking System 19

20. Result Quality Assurance Project management SRS Template Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 20

21. Review action: Review within sub-team. Cross-review of two sub-team Customers clarification. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 21

22. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 22

23. NON FUNCTIONAL Result Quality Assurance Project management IDMetricRequirement REL001 POFOD (Probability of failure on demand) 0.002 In 500 of service requests may result 1 failure on demand REL002 ROCOF (Rate of failure occurrence) 0.005 In 1000 operational time units, there are 5 failures likely to occur REL003 MTTF (Mean time to failure) 720(h) Mean time between two successive failures is 720h REL004 AVAIL (Availability) 0.950 In 1000 hours of operation, the system must be available for at least 950h REL005 MTTR (Mean time to repair) 24(h) The system is allowed 24h to be out of operation after it has failed REL006 DR Defect rate 1 bug / KLOG (thousand lines of code) Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 23 -Reliability IDType SEC001Identification SEC002Authentication SEC003Authorization SEC004Privacy SEC005Immunity SEC006Integrity -Security IDTypeRequirement POR001Program portability The system must be deployed as an Extranet Website and required to be run successfully on Internet Explorer 7 or upper and other popular browsers such as Firefox and Google Chrome POR002Data portability The data of the system must be stored using SQL Server Express 2005 or Oracle database POR003End-user portabilityThe system is required to have the same look and feel across different browsers. All are displayed according to the standard of Website user interface design: The form of index pages will list all the record, and there is a link to the add, edit and remove page. All the button of saving changes or adding will be put at the bottom of the textboxes. When there are some errors occurred, display red message to the users and require them to do again (if possible). After successfully changing the data, display notification to users. All pages of the application will have the same menu and users can access to functionalities of the system from here. -Portability IDTypeRequirement PER001Response time The average time to response for a transaction when managing parameters is 2s and the maximum is 5s. The average time to response for a transaction when ranking for customers is 3s and the maximum is 8s PER002CapacityThe system can accommodate for a maximum number of 1000 users at different locations -Performance

24. I. DB design Goal: Solve business requirement. Try following 3 Normal Form. Inherit customer data Approach: Bottom up Design and edit, review, merge in Visio then create DB Result: Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 24

25. DB design Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 25

26. II. System Design Base on non-Functional requirement: -Need a lot of user using common DB Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 26

27. Framework : Using MVC( Microsoft MVC.Net 2.0) -Advance : beside common advance, it save our time Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 27  MVC architecture

28. Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 28

29. Result Quality Assurance Project management  Component Diagram: Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 29

30.  Detail design  Goal: Describe all class, function in this program  Approach: Bottom up: each person design a function, Using our excel template and MS Visio.  Result Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 30

31. Result Quality Assurance Project management Implemented modules  Goal: Build a system fulfill requirement onetime.  Approach: Bottom-up Using Google code, svn and ankhsvn( visual studio add-in) to manage source  Result: Demo(late) Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

32. Result Quality Assurance Project management Implemented modules Administration Parameters Clustering Ranking Report Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 32

33. Result Quality Assurance Project management  K-means algorithm 1.Definite : k-means clustering is a method of cluster analysis which aims to partition n observations into k clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean. Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System

34. Result Quality Assurance Project management 2. K-means Algorithm flow char Credit Ranking System

35. Result Quality Assurance Project management 3.Apply:  Each customer is considered a vector. Business customer: one dimension vector. Individual customer: two dimension vector (x: collateral index; y: basic index)  Data sample is all customers in a period report  k determine from habubank Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 4.Why K-means:  Simple, easy to implement, easy to use for end user  Out put of this system suitable for k-means algorithm  In put of this system decrease disadvantage of K-means

36. Result Quality Assurance Project management Testing activities Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 36

37. Testing process Result Quality Assurance Project management Create TC template Write TC (based on SRS) Review TC Create test data IT Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 37

38. Result Test case Quality Assurance Project management Test case Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 38

39. Test data Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 39

40. Test report Result Quality Assurance Project management Introduction Development process Demo Q&A SRS Design Testing Group Presentation view-point Business context Implement Plan Credit Ranking System 40

41. LOGO