Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEsmond Allison Modified over 8 years ago
1
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON PENN S TATE Timothy W. Simpson Professor of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Engineering Design The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 USA phone: (814) 863-7136 email: tws8@psu.edu http://www.mne.psu.edu/simpson/courses/me546 ME 546 - Designing Product Families - IE 546 Spring 2009 Project Descriptions © T. W. S IMPSON
2
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON Projects for Spring 2009 Product Family Metrics 1.Product packaging study (w/Dr. Shooter @ Bucknell) 2.SWOT analysis for global product families (w/Dr. Lehtihet) Design Automation 3.Modular design using cyberinfrastructure (J. Yoo, Lead) 4.Tools for product family benchmarking (A. Jain, Lead) 5.Product family optimization through visualization (L. Slingerland, Lead) Design for Human Variability (w/Dr. Parkinson) 6.Product family sizing using Design for Human Variability 7.“Universal” product family design – theory and practice (also w/Dr. McAdams @ Texas A&M)
3
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 1. Product packaging study Consumable products such as foods, drinks and pharmaceuticals can not be differentiated using visual features Must rely on “artificial” differentiating characteristics like dyes or shapes Most rely on packaging to differentiate one product offering from the next Goal: Examine the use of commonality metrics to assess packaging Develop new metrics for product packaging
4
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 2. SWOT analysis for global product families Many companies these days compete globally for market share Market heterogeneity arises from cultural differences as well as different needs in different regions of the world Products are being designed, developed, and manufactured in multiple countries around the world In many cases, cost to develop a platform outweighs savings from outsourcing Goal: Investigate the use of SWOT analysis for companies competing global Develop new metrics/tools for such companies to use that will broaden their perspective when making product family design decisions Production Worker’s Hourly wage (2002) Production Worker’s Hourly wage (2002)
5
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 3. Modular design using cyberinfrastructure Design is often carried out by geographically-dispersed teams operating on different sub-systems/modules Recent advances in cyberinfrastructure can facilitate this process provided appropriate advances are made in the supporting IT Goal: Investigate the use of web service description language and composition algorithms to support modular design
6
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON UMR’s Design Repository Develop an suitable interface-oriented representation and apply an automated algorithm for product synthesis = functions = geometric information = input = output Similar to WSDL
7
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 4. Tools for product family benchmarking Many companies are now benchmarking families of products in addition to individual product offerings Tools for product family benchmarking are limited Matrix-based representations and commonality metrics exists but are not readily available or easily understood by designers Likewise, algorithms for assessment are varied in their format, I/O, size restrictions, and availability Goal: Develop an Excel-based spreadsheet that – Inputs BOM/assembly – Generates/sorts DSM – Computes GVI and commonality metrics Demonstrate its use with a suitable product family
8
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 5. Product family optimization through visualization Product family optimization involves tradeoffs between multiple objectives that are often difficult to weight Interactive visualization can provide insights that might help Goal: Investigate the use of visual-based optimization tools to optimize a product family Demonstrate its use optimizing a family of three General Aviation Aircraft 2-Seat Aircraft4-Seat Aircraft6-Seat Aircraft
9
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 6. Product family sizing using DfHV Sizing a product line is usually done by identifying the “big” and “small” and creating sizes to fit everyone in between Goal: Develop a method to size a family or products using the principal components of variability in the population Demonstrate the proposed method on a suitable product family case study
10
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON 7. “Universal” product family design While most products are designed to work across a range of performance-related needs, considerations for “universal” design are typically ignored or left until the end of the product design process Goal: Study 5-6 product “pairs” and identify ways in which universal design can be considered during the product family design process, not after
11
PENN S TATE © T. W. S IMPSON Forming Project Teams You will work in groups of 4-6 people on each project Take a minute to think about which project interests you most Find 4-5 like minded people and form a team If there is overwhelming interest in one project, then we can run two teams in parallel Identify a time on Friday (2/20) or Monday (2/23) in PM when your whole group can meet Schedule a kick-off meeting with me for your team Between now and then, read papers posted on Angel
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.