Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAndrew Nash Modified over 8 years ago
1
W11/30/11; F11/19/10; M11/24/08; Tu12/4/07; F12/1/06; M12/5/05 Compromise of 1850 (Ch. 14.1 & 13.3; pp. 373-384) W11/30/11; F11/19/10; M11/24/08; Tu12/4/07; F12/1/06; M12/5/05 Compromise of 1850 (Ch. 14.1 & 13.3; pp. 373-384)
2
I. Roots of Compromise A. Impact of Mexican War Colossus of North – (Mex. View) well-trained army good military leadership sectional split slavery in west
3
B. Wilmot Proviso David Wilmot (Dem-PA) before Mex. War no slavery in new territory H.O.R. – passes - Why? – more reps in N. Senate – No! - Why? – equal rep. Even # of states – N/S
4
C. Election of 1848 Taylor – Whig – LA - Slavery – no stance [owned slaves] Lewis Cass – Dem – MI - “squatter sov.” (later popular sov.) Free Soilers – no good candidates in W/D Van Buren – Free Soil – NY - 10% of votes - Liberty Party, Free Soil, abolitionists, Conscience Whigs, N. Dems
5
D. Gold Rush 1848 – gold! [gold discovered – Jan. 1848] get-rich-quick massive migration 100K people by 1850 ‘49ers – [first big year of emigration] lawlessness – need for law & order apply as free state now a national issue
6
II. Compromise of 1850 A.Regional Differences 1. South – John Calhoun (SC) - opposed – no balance in Senate 2. West – Henry Clay (KY) - supports – Union - Great Compromiser 3. North – Daniel Webster (MA) - supports – Union last time on national scene for old time politicians
7
B. Elements of Compromise North: CA free state TX border to NM territory No slave trade in DC [still allowed slavery] South: FSL – stricter UT, NM – pop. sov. TX - $10M comp. for lost land
8
C. Response Stephen Douglas (D-IL) - new hero - “Little Giant” push to extremism - S: “fire eaters” – secession? - Nashville Convention - N: abolitionists – Seward (NY)
9
III. Fugitive Slave Law – 1850 III. Fugitive Slave Law – 1850 stricter law updates 1790 FSL escaped slaves returned punishment for helping U.S. Marshals (federal help) Anthony Burns – Boston riots
10
IV. Personal Liberty Laws response to FSL state laws to protect runaway slaves federal-state debate – who wants stronger federal laws? – Why? - interesting switch – N/S Underground RR continues – very dangerous
11
Looking Forward How can U.S. avoid future sectional problems? Avoid slavery issue Next Big Issues: 1. Uncle Tom’s Cabin 2. Kansas-Nebraska Act Oops!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.