Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLee Dawson Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous CMC on Oral Performance in German (Zsuzsanna Ittzes Abrams,2003) Alex/N97C0027
2
Introduction CMC has increasingly received recognition for its ability to improve foreign language performance, presumably by creating a more positive collaborative learning environment. CMC has increasingly received recognition for its ability to improve foreign language performance, presumably by creating a more positive collaborative learning environment.
3
Research Questions 1.Does CMC result in better oral performance than traditional classroom tasks? 1.Does CMC result in better oral performance than traditional classroom tasks? H 1 :CMC will have a positive effect on oral performance. H 1 :CMC will have a positive effect on oral performance. 2.If so, is there a difference between the effects of asynchronous or synchronous CMC on oral performance? 2.If so, is there a difference between the effects of asynchronous or synchronous CMC on oral performance? H 0 :There will be no difference in the oral performance of students in the SCMC and the ACMC groups. H 0 :There will be no difference in the oral performance of students in the SCMC and the ACMC groups.
4
Review of Literature CMC in Second Language Learning CMC in Second Language Learning Face-to-Face Communication(oral communication) Face-to-Face Communication(oral communication) CMC and Transferability to Oral Communication(SCMC,ACMC) CMC and Transferability to Oral Communication(SCMC,ACMC)
5
Research Method Quasi-experimental study. Quasi-experimental study. 96 university students. 96 university students. 1 semester. 1 semester. A control group, a SCMC group, an ACMC group. A control group, a SCMC group, an ACMC group. Depend variables The number of idea units and words, the lexical richness and diversity, and the syntactic complexity of learner language. One-Way ANOVA
6
The conclusion 1.Students in SCMC group proudced quantity of language than the other two groups. 2.ACMC students did not outperform the control group. 3.There are no signifinant differences among the 3 groups either lexically or syntactically.
7
Implications CMC should continue to be seen as a tool for interaction in its own right and that training communication via this medium can help learners prepare for Internet-mediated or other computer- mediated authentic interactions. CMC should continue to be seen as a tool for interaction in its own right and that training communication via this medium can help learners prepare for Internet-mediated or other computer- mediated authentic interactions.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.