Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The ontogeny of mentalising: first steps on the road to other minds dr fenja ziegler c82 sad lecture 2.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The ontogeny of mentalising: first steps on the road to other minds dr fenja ziegler c82 sad lecture 2."— Presentation transcript:

1 the ontogeny of mentalising: first steps on the road to other minds dr fenja ziegler c82 sad lecture 2

2 the princess bride cognition in action

3 how do I know whether you know what I know and you know that I know, if you know what I mean... how can we tell whether someone has a ToM? assumption that people: carry out actions to satisfy desires based on supposition that beliefs are true is understanding and predicting that action enough evidence for ToM? True Belief or False Belief? FB: methodological and theoretical advantages Daniel Dennett

4 unexpected transfer - or Maxi - task while Maxi is out playing, his Mum takes the chocolate from the cupboard and grates some of it into a cake. Maxi is returning from play, feeling hungry. He wants his chocolate. Where will Maxi look for his chocolate? Where did Maxi put his chocolate? Where did Mum put his chocolate

5 unexpected transfer - or Maxi - task Test: Where will Maxi look for his chocolate? Memory: Where did Maxi put his chocolate? Reality: Where did Mum put his chocolate

6 what do Maxi and chocolate tell us about the mind? litmus test for understanding the mind (evidence of ToM) the mind as an interpreter of reality do not act on reality but on what we believe reality to be 4 but not 3 year olds pass the test

7 appearance... reality Flavell et al. 1983 What does it look like? What is it really?

8 a smartie for the smarties task

9 deceptive box test Perner et al. (1997) What is inside this tube? What is in it? What will your friend xxx say is inside? Gopnik and Astington (1988) When you first saw this tube, before we opened it, what did you think was inside?

10 perhaps it tells us nothing........ lack of story comprehension....

11 before 2005 do we KNOW that 3 year olds don’t have ToM? lack of positive evidence problem with language? time reference test question (Siegal & Beattie, 1991) story comprehension (Lewis et al. 1994) have children been underestimated? but what about the Deceptive box?

12 state change Wimmer & Hartl, 1991 When you first saw this what (did you think) was inside?

13 are children really just answering “what was inside?” What’s inside this tube? What is it? I’ve taken away the toothbrush and put a pencil in the tube When you first saw this tube, before we opened it, what was inside? When you first saw this tube, before we opened it, what did you think was inside?

14 What’s inside this tube? What is it? I’ve taken away the toothbrush and put a pencil in the tube When you first saw this tube, before we opened it, what was inside? When you first saw this tube, before we opened it, what did you think was inside? if questions treated same: report toothbrush, but report pencil sensitive to distinction: correctly report first content

15 break & announcements

16 2005

17

18

19 15 months (!) olds have FB understanding

20 if 15 months can do it, sure adults can... Keysar et al. 2003

21 curse of knowledge Mitchell, Robinson, Isaacs, and Nye (1996)

22 curse of knowledge Mitchell, Robinson, Isaacs, and Nye (1996) Actually, in Kevin’s absence and unknown to him she did replace the juice with milk.

23 curse of knowledge Mitchell, Robinson, Isaacs, and Nye (1996) Fischhoff, 1975

24 Is belief reasoning automatic? Figure 1. Schematic event sequence for experimental video trials with BELIEF / REALITY probes. 1. Woman looks in open boxes (so gains true belief about object’s location). 2. Woman places marker to indicate location of object, then leaves room. 3. Man swaps boxes (so woman has false belief). 4. Probe sentence. 5. Woman returns and change in frame of video prompts subject to point to box containing object (Conditions 1 and 2 only)

25 Is belief reasoning automatic? no

26 mentalising = beliefs? focus on beliefs what about: goals intentions desires perceptual states emotional states etc....

27 mentalising = beliefs? come go Ziegler et al. 2005

28 mentalising = beliefs? come go Ziegler et al. 2005 spontaneous perspective taking

29 can we make sense of this? children can pass FB test age 4, but not before (see Wellman, Cross & Watson, 2001) children aged 15 months show non-verbal FB understanding adults are not as good at mentalising as we might assume belief attribution is not automatic perspective taking is spontaneous

30 selected key references Apperly, I.A., Riggs, K.J., Simpson, A., Samson, D., & Chiavarino, C. (2006). Psychological Science.17(10) 841-844 Gopnik, A., & Astington, J.W. (1988). Child Development, 59, 26-37. Keysar, B., Lin, S.& Barr, D. J. (2003). Cognition, 89, 25-41. Mitchell, P., & Ziegler, F. (2007). Fundamentals of Development: The Psychology of Childhood. Hove: Psychology Press. Onishi, K., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Science, 308, 255-258. Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. Ziegler, F., Currie, G., & Mitchell, P. (2005) Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 115- 123.


Download ppt "The ontogeny of mentalising: first steps on the road to other minds dr fenja ziegler c82 sad lecture 2."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google