1. County Delivery Review School Survey Results Report to Steering Committee August 16, 2010 Prepared by Judy Ashley Extension Coordinator for School Relations

2. Methods Target audience: school superintendents and elementary school principals Online survey via Survey Monkey 218 responded 73 counties represented in results (46%) 78 school systems represented (43%) Survey divided into: ◦ Introductory questions ◦ Funding ◦ Value of programming areas ◦ Value of delivery methods ◦ Demographics

4. Introductory/Funding questions Does UGA CE/4-H provide programming in any school in your school system? Does your school system provide funding? If yes, return on investment? Willingness to collaborate? Would you allow paraprofessionals?

10. Value of Programming Areas Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition Education Public Speaking Citizenship and Youth Leadership Science Engineering and Technology Youth in Agriculture

16. Ranking of Programming Areas Citizenship/Leadership (121) Science Engineering and Technology (105) Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition (99) Public Speaking (98) Youth in Agriculture (82)

17. Value of Delivery Methods Camps and conferences In-school programming (club meetings) Competitive events Environmental Education

22. Ranking of Delivery Methods In-school programming (95) Competitive Events (83) Environmental Education and Camps and Conferences (69 each)

23. Funding Strategies Increase funding 20-30% Maintain current funding but collaborate Support property tax levy Increase user fees to students

25. Demographics Name of the school system Position School System enrollment

28. Summary 87% received programming from CE/4-H 75% willing to collaborate 59% disagreed with using parapros Highest ranked programming area – Citizenship/Leadership Highest ranked delivery method – In-school programming

29. Thank you Judy Ashley Extension Coordinator for School Relations jashley@uga.edu