Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWalter Ford Modified over 9 years ago
1
Questions you may have asked yourself: Why do people suggest that chemicals are bad for us? Why should I study chemistry? Why do scientists so often say “more study is needed”? Why do scientists bother with studies that have no immediate applications? Can we change lead into gold?
3
Model
4
35 Xenon Atoms – Don Eigler - 1989
6
Carbon Monoxide Man
12
Solid-Liquid-Gas Simulation
15
SI Unit Definitions from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
16
The IPK – International Prototype Kilogram
17
Left Right
18
01_T06.JPG
19
Testing a Scientific Claim – Thinking Critically about a Claim FLaReS Test (a modification of a more substantial approach): Falsifiability: Can the claim be proven to be either true or false? Logical: Arguments supporting the claim must be logical – if any premises in the argument are false, the claim cannot be validated Reproducible: If based on scientific evidence, the evidence must be reproducible. Sufficient: The evidence provided must be adequate to support the claim. The burden of evidence rests with the claimant Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence Evidence based on authority and/or testimony is never adequate A claim must pass all tests to be considered valid.
20
Example of FLaReS A psychic claims he can bend a spoon using only the powers of his mind. However, he says he can do so only when the conditions are right; there must be no one with negative energy present. Evaluate this psychic’s claim using the FLaReS test Falsifiable? Logical? Reproducible? Sufficient?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.