2. % Dyadic Concordance Types for Injury As Reported By Men And Women Age 24-33 (National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health N=4,795) 2 Couple Prevalence according to: Males: 4% Females: 4% Tillyer, M. S., & Wright, E. M. (2014). Intimate Partner Violence and the Victim-Offender Overlap. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(1), 29-55. doi: 10.1177/0022427813484315 Note: DTs are for the sub group of couples in which there was assault

3. % Dyadic Concordance Types for Injury As Reported By 481 University Students 3 Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender Differences in Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Aggression Among College Students using the revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence & Victims, 18(2), 197-217. Couple Prevalence according to: Males: 11% Females: 9%

4. % Dyadic Concordance Types for Any Injury As Reported By 1,157 University Students 4 Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520. Prevalence for ANY injury: Short: 7.7% Full: 8.5%

5. % Dyadic Concordance Types for Severe Injury As Reported By 1,157 University Students 5 Straus, M. A. and E. M. Douglas (2004). "A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for seventy and mutuality." Violence and Victims 19: 507-520. Prevalence for SEVERE injury: Short: 1.8% Full: 2.4%