Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJoan Franklin Modified over 9 years ago
1
I. What is intelligence? II. How is it tested? III. Controversies
2
Part I: Intelligence
3
Intelligence Intelligence should be universal
Exactly how intelligence is expressed will differ given the context.
4
History of Intelligence Testing
5
History of Intelligence Testing
(1600s) Francis Bacon - the scientific method
6
History of Intelligence Testing
(1600s) Francis Bacon - the scientific method (1800s) Francis March “vulgar utilitarianism”
7
History of Intelligence Testing
(1600s) Francis Bacon - the scientific method (1800s) Francis March “vulgar utilitarianism” Francis March sat beside James Cattell
8
History of Intelligence Testing
James Cattell gets stoned, and then argues
9
History of Intelligence Testing
James Cattell gets stoned, and then argues Cattell becomes a psychometrician
10
History of Intelligence Testing
James Cattell gets stoned, and then argues Cattell becomes a psychometrician At Cambridge falls in with Francis Galton
11
History of Intelligence Testing
James Cattell gets stoned, and then argues Cattell becomes a psychometrician At Cambridge falls in with Francis Galton Francis Galton would later develop eugenics
12
History of Intelligence Testing
James Cattell gets stoned, and then argues Cattell becomes a psychometrician At Cambridge falls in with Francis Galton Francis Galton would later develop eugenics Cattell is now a professor at age 29
13
History of Intelligence Testing
Cattell coined ‘mental tests’ For example, Bisection of a 50 cm line Judgment of a 10 second time Number of letters repeated
14
History of Intelligence Testing
1895 Cattell moves to Columbia U (NY)
15
History of Intelligence Testing
1895 Cattell moves to Columbia U (NY) As president of the APA Cattell convenes a meeting
16
History of Intelligence Testing
1895 Cattell moves to Columbia U (NY) As president of the APA Cattell convenes a meeting recommends they test senses, motor capacity, and mental processes
17
History of Intelligence Testing
1895 Cattell moves to Columbia U (NY) As president of the APA Cattell convenes a meeting recommends they test senses, motor capacity, and mental processes Back in France Binet emerges on the scene
18
History of Intelligence Testing
Spearman gives birth to the g/s factor theory
19
History of Intelligence Testing
Henry Goddard emerges, and in 1908 visits Binet
20
History of Intelligence Testing
Binet’s ideas of testing move away from labels
21
History of Intelligence Testing
Binet’s ideas of testing move away from labels IQ = (Mental age/chronological age) *100 For example, (15/10) * 100 = 150
22
History of Intelligence Testing
Binet’s ideas of testing move away from labels IQ = (Mental age/chronological age) *100 For example, (15/10) * 100 = 150 Ellis Island under Goddard WWI recruits under Yerkes & Terman
23
History of Intelligence Testing
1920s -remember Cattell studied with Darwin’s cousin Galton
24
History of Intelligence Testing
1920s -remember Cattell studied with Darwin’s cousin Galton Terman argued that the correlation between test scores and social status pointed to heredity of intelligence
25
History of Intelligence Testing
1920s -remember Cattell studied with Darwin’s cousin Galton Terman argued that the correlation between test scores and social status pointed to heredity of intelligence Terman would work with Thorndike Dewey argues that these tests measure a social construction
26
History Leads to Theory
Thurstone’s work would lead to the recognition that there are 7-9 mental abilities
27
History Leads to Theory
Horn, student of Cattell, brings together work in the field and devises the Cattell-Horn Theory
28
History Leads to Theory
Horn, student of Cattell, brings together work in the field and devises the Cattell-Horn Theory Modern theory rests on the idea that intelligence can be found by analyzing inter-correlations of scores on mental ability tests
30
History Leads to Theory
Meanwhile distinct factor analytic work by Carroll has led to
31
CARROLL’S (1993) THREE-STRATUM THEORY OF COGNITIVE ABILITIES
General Intelligence (Stratum III) General (Carroll, 1993, 1997) Gf Gc Gy Gv Gu Gr Gs Gt (Stratum II) Broad Processing Speed (RT Decision Speed) General Memory & Learning Broad Visual Perception Broad Auditory Perception Broad Retrieval Ability Broad Cognitive Speediness Fluid Intelligence Crystallized Intelligence (Stratum I) Narrow 69+ narrow abilities found in data sets analyzed by Carroll © Institute for Applied Psychometrics, llc K McGrew
32
Intelligence Theory Meets Practice
1985 Richard Woodcock hears about the theory 1989 The Great Gathering This leads to factor analytic studies of the WJ
33
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
Linguistic Logical-mathematical Spatial Musical Bodily-Kinesthetic Interpersonal Intrapersonal Naturalist
34
Part II: Testing Intelligence
35
Individual Tests of Intelligence
Stanford-Binet Wechsler Scales Kaufman Scales Woodcock Johnson
36
Wechsler Scales Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
WAIS, WAIS-R, WAIS-III Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children WISC, WISC-R, WISC-III, WISC-IV Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)
37
Subscales of the WISC-III
Verbal Information Similarities Arithmetic Vocabulary Comprehension Digit Span Performance Picture Completion Picture Arrangement Symbol Search Object Assembly Coding Mazes
39
Part III: Controversies
40
Testing Issues Inadequate sample of each domain
Limited (nonspecific) treatment or instruction implications
41
Thurstone Binet Terman Yerkes Horn Wechsler Cattell Gardner
42
Bell Curve Assertions IQ tests are not biased against minority groups.
A significant fraction of the individual differences in IQ scores is explained by genetics (40-60%). African-Americans score significantly lower than White-Americans on IQ tests (12-15 points).
43
Gould Debunks the Bell Curve
“The authors omit facts, misuse statistical methods, and seem unwilling to admit the consequences of their own words.” “Nothing angered me more than the authors’ failure to supply any justification for their central claim that the number known as g captures a real property in the head.”
44
Bigger Questions Are intelligence tests useful? If so, for what? If not, why not? Are intelligence tests biased? What are the positive and negative social consequences of using intelligence tests? What are the alternatives?
45
APA Consensus Statement
It is widely agreed that standardized tests do not sample all forms of intelligence. Environmental factors contribute substantially to the development of intelligence, but it is not clearly understood what those factors are or how they work.
46
The Flynn Effect Across 14 nations, 5-25 point increase in IQ within one generation 90% of those born 100 years ago would score at the 5th percentile of current norms Are we really getting smarter?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.