1. Executive Session Director’s Progress Review of the NOvA Project August 4-5, 2010 Dean A. Hoffer

2. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 2 Agenda for Executive Session Charge to Reviewers Review Focus Review Agenda Reporting Structure Reviewer Assignments Discussion

3. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 3 Charge

4. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 4 Charge (continued)

5. Questions to be addressed in each breakouts What work has been accomplished and was the work done per the project’s plan (cost and schedule baseline)? Is the plan for the remaining work reasonable and achievable? Is the organization in place to accomplish the remaining work per the plan? 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 5

6. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 6 Agenda

7. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 7 Agenda (continued)

8. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 8 Reviewer Assignments

9. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 9 Reviewer Assignments (continued)

10. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 10 Reviewer Assignments for Breakouts

11. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 11 Reporting Structure Review findings, comments, and recommendations should be presented in writing at a closeout with the NOvA’s and Fermilab’s management. Section for each “Level 2” WBS plus Cost, Schedule, Management sections.

12. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 12 Findings, Comments, and Recommendations Findings Comments Recommendations Findings are statements of fact that summarize noteworthy information presented during the review. Comments are judgment statements about the facts presented during the review. The reviewers' comments are based on their experiences and expertise. The comments are to be evaluated by the project team and actions taken as deemed appropriate. Recommendations are statements of actions that should be addressed by the project team. A response to the recommendation is expected and that the actions taken would be reported on during future reviews.

13. Examples of Findings, Comments, and Recommendations Finding –A plan for the MI upgrades was presented. The major elements of this plan consist of an upgrade of a MI quad power supply, which is nearly complete, and the addition of two more RF stations. The cavities to be installed currently exist as spares so there is no design and prototyping required. Comment –The project has decided to build the DCCT in-house. The committee supports this effort since the technology and design of this device is well developed and well known. Recommendation –Work with Fermilab management to acquire resources needed to complete the accelerator and beamline modifications. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 13

14. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 14 Reviewer Write-ups Write-up template is posted on Director’s Review Webpage. http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/OPMO/Projects/NOvA/DirRev/2010/0 8_04/Closeout_Presentation_NOvA_Progress_2010-08-04.docx Write-ups are to be sent to Terry Erickson at terickson@fnal.gov prior to 10:30 AM on Thursday, August 5 for the Closeout Dry Run A final report will be issued within 1 weeks after the closeout.

15. 04-Aug-2010Director's Progress Review of the NOvA Project 15 Discussion Questions and Answers