Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Subprime Securities Litigation Claims Law Seminars International Conference on the Subprime Lending Crisis New York Mariott Marquis Times Square Hotel.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Subprime Securities Litigation Claims Law Seminars International Conference on the Subprime Lending Crisis New York Mariott Marquis Times Square Hotel."— Presentation transcript:

1 Subprime Securities Litigation Claims Law Seminars International Conference on the Subprime Lending Crisis New York Mariott Marquis Times Square Hotel New York, NY March 18-19, 2008 Richard P. Swanson Arnold & Porter LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 212-715-1179 richard.swanson@aporter.com

2 1 Subprime Securities Litigation Securities Class Action Lawsuits – 48 to-date  Financial institutions re: loss disclosures – Toxic debt they didn’t get off the books fast enough  Mortgage originators – Few assets to recover against 351612

3 2 Subprime Securities Litigation “You didn’t tell us what was there, or how bad the stuff was.”  One response: “If we had known how bad it was, why would we have kept some of it on our books?”

4 3 Subprime Securities Litigation Securities Claims Involving Origination  Note investors in securitization pools, SIVs and CDOs – Against originators, underwriters/securitizers, etc.  Not really started yet – collateral needs to be liquidated, etc.

5 4 Subprime Securities Litigation Securities Claims Involving Investment Mangers  E.g., State Street/Prudential, HSB, IDB  “You put us into this stuff” – KYC, suitability, etc. – Can include ERISA and breach of contract and fiduciary duty claims

6 5 Subprime Securities Litigation Common Issues and Themes  Fraud in the loan origination and underwriting process – Actions by the originator which permeate downstream  Due Diligence by underwriter/securitizer  Valuation – FAS 157 and Levels 1, 2, 3 – Were modeling assumptions too aggressive? – Mark to market, mark to model, mark to meltdown

7 6 Subprime Securities Litigation Common Issues and Themes (con’t)  Inadequate servicing  Inadequacies in delinquency and default reporting  Breach of securitization documents – Reps and warranties, eligibility, etc.  Accuracy of financial statements and disclosure documents

8 7 Subprime Securities Litigation Secondary Players  Trustees, servicers  Securitizers, Underwriters  Bond Insurers  Rating Agencies  Attorneys  Accountants – Typically auditors of the securitizers/underwriters, bond insurers, originators, etc.

9 8 Subprime Securities Litigation Failed Deal Litigation  E.g., URI and others in Delaware Chancery Court  Contractual remedies, MAC etc.

10 9 Subprime Securities Litigation Defenses and Motions to Dismiss  Tellabs: pleading standard and scienter (127 S. Ct. 2411 (2007)) – Compare Accredited Home Lenders (07. Civ. 488 H) (S.D. Cal.) and Indy Mac Bancorp (07 Civ. 1635) (C.D. Cal.)  Stoneridge: secondary liability (No. 06-43, decided January 15, 2008)  Dura Pharmaceuticals: loss causation (544 U.S. 336 (2005))

11 10 Subprime Securities Litigation Class Certification  2 nd Circuit IPO cases: need more than “some showing” to certify a class (471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir. 2006)  5 th Circuit Enron decision: need to show the existence of a cause of action on which reliance can appropriately be presumed (482 F.3d 372 (5 th Cir. 2007))  5 th Circuit Allegiance Telecom decision: loss causation needs to be demonstrated (487 F.3d 261 (5 th Cir. 2007))

12 11 Subprime Securities Litigation Some Special Considerations  Credit Default Swaps (“CDSs”)  Fund litigation  Margin valuation litigation  Debt enforcement litigation  Valuation and internal controls

13 12 Subprime Securities Litigation Some Special Considerations (con’t)  Possible 33 Act Claims – Section 11: misstatements in a registration statement, subject to a due diligence defense – Section 12(e)(2): misstatements by a seller of securities

14 13 Subprime Securities Litigation Some Special Considerations (con’t)  Multiple write-downs of some assets  Quality of the disclosures  Forward-looking statements and the “bespeaks caution” doctrine

15 14 Some Special Considerations (con’t) Enforcement and Investigation  SEC: Subprime Task Force – Make sure the values and the risks are disclosed  Federal Banking Regulators  Criminal investigations  State AGs

16 15 Questions? Feedback and Discussion


Download ppt "Subprime Securities Litigation Claims Law Seminars International Conference on the Subprime Lending Crisis New York Mariott Marquis Times Square Hotel."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google