Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJayson Henderson Modified over 9 years ago
1
2008.9.19 Bled workshop -core potentials for light nuclei derived from the quark-model baryon-baryon interaction Y. Fujiwara ( Kyoto) M. Kohno ( Kyushu Dental ) Y. Suzuki ( Niigata ) Y. Suzuki ( Niigata ) 1. Introduction 2. N interaction by fss2 and FSS 3. G-matrix calculations and the folding procedure 4. s.p. potential for symmetric nuclear matter 5. -core potentials with core=(3N), , 12 C(0 + ), 16 O 6. Summary
2
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Purpose Clarify N interaction Experimental background Quark-model B 8 B 8 interaction fss2, FSS : QMPACK homepage Quark-model B 8 B 8 interaction fss2, FSS : QMPACK homepage http://qmpack.homelinux.com/~qmpack/index.php G-matric calculation of nuclear matter and three-cluster Faddeev G-matric calculation of nuclear matter and three-cluster Faddeev calculations of the s-shell and p-shell nuclei calculations of the s-shell and p-shell nuclei Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 439 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58 (2007) 439 BNL-E885 J-PARC Day-1 exp. (Nagae et al.) 12 C(K -,K + ) 12 Be ( 11 B+ - bound state ?) N total cross sections Tamagawa et al. Nucl. Phys. A691 (2001) 234c Yamamoto et al. Prog. Theor. Phys. 106 (2001) 363 Theoretical development
3
2008.9.19 Bled workshop BNL-E885 U 0 ~ -14 MeV by Y. Yamamoto
4
2008.9.19 Bled workshop N interaction: OBEP vs. fss2 (or FSS) (Example) NSC04(d) reproduces U (0) - 14 MeV strong attractioninI=0 3 S 1 channel strong attraction in I=0 3 S 1 channel strong - N- coupling in I=0 1 S 0 channel strong - N- coupling in I=0 1 S 0 channel “OBEP requires rich experimental data !” An advantage of the quark-model BB interaction :the quark-model BB interaction a comprehensive model reproducing all available NN and YN data short-range part by quarks 、 intermediate and long-range part by meson-exchange mechanisms meson exchange potentials (EMEP) acting between quarks reduce the parameter ambiguities
5
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Specific bound states in 2-,3-,4-body systems by Y. Yamamoto
6
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Ehime ~ NHC-D attractive parts are dominated by scalar singlet mesons
7
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 2. Characteristics of the quark-model N interaction S-wave S-wave : classification by the flavor SU 3 symmetry is useful N(I=0) attractive 、 N(I=1) repulsive 1 S 0 is the strongest 2 types of baryon-channel couplings are important quark and EMEP cancel each other - N- (I=0) : quark and EMEP cancel each other no H-particle bound state fss2 vs. FSS quark and EMEP enhance N- - (I=1) : quark and EMEP enhance large cusp structure at threshold N (I=0) 3 S 1 : single baryon channel, pure (11) a 0 P-wave P-wave : EMEP are of the Wigner type attractive N(I=0) : attraction in 3 P 0, 1 P 1 N(I=1) : attraction in 3 P 1, 3 P 2, ( 1 P 1 )
8
B 8 B 8 systems classified in the SU 3 states with (, ) [ ‐ (11) a +(30)] [(11) a +(30)] (03) [(11) s +3(22)] [3(11) s ‐( 22 ) ] (22) ‐3‐3 ― (11) a [ ‐ (11) a + (30)+(03)] [(30) ‐ (03)] ― [2(11) a + (30)+(03)] ― (11) s + (22)+ (00) (11) s ‐ (22)+ (00) (11) s + (22) ー (11) s + (22) (11) s - (22) - (00) ― (22) (30) ― (22) [ ‐ (11) a +(03)] [(11) a +(03)] (30) [(11) s +3(22)] [3(11) s ‐ (22)] (22) ‐1‐1 (03) ― (22) NN(0) NN(1) 3 E, 1 O ( P =antisymmetric) 1 E, 3 O ( P =symmetric)B 8 B 8 (I)S (11) s complete Pauli forbidden (30) almost forbidden ( =2/9) ‐2‐2 0 ‐4‐4
9
Spin-flavor SU 6 symmetry 1. Quark-model Hamiltonian is approximately SU 3 scalar (assumption) ・ no confinement contribution (assumption) ・ Fermi-Breit int. … quark-mass dependence only ・ EMEP … SU 3 relations for coupling constants are automatic phenomenologyCf. OBEP: exp data g, f, … (integrate) phenomenology Cf. OBEP: exp data g, f, … (integrate) 2. -on plays an important role through SU 3 relations and FSB 3. effect of the flavor symmetry breaking (FSB) Characteristics of SU 3 channels 1 S, 3 P ( P -symmetric) 3 S, 1 P ( P -antisymmetric) pp (22) attractive pp np (03) strongly attractive np N(I=1/2) (11) s strongly repulsive N(I=1/2) N(I=3/2) (30) strongly repulsive N(I=3/2) (00) ( strongly) attractive H-particle channel H-particle channel N(I=0) (11) a weakly attractive N(I=0) “only this part is ambiguous” “only this part is ambiguous” f /f NN =2 m -1 = - 1 /5 in SU 6
10
S= ‐ 2 I=0 phase shifts (H-particle channel) FSS fss2 no bound state below from Nagara event
11
N (I=0) 3 S 1 phase shifts FSS fss2 Never be so attractive like ESC04(d) !
12
N (I=1) 1 S 0 and 3 S 1 phase shifts by fss2 threshold
13
P-wave phase shifts FSS fss2
14
FSSfss2 - (in medium) = 30.7±6.7 mb (eikonal approx.)= 20.9±4.5 mb +3.7 -3.6 +2.5 -2.4 - p / - n =1.1 at p lab =550 MeV/c +1.4+0.7 -0.7 -0.4 Tamagawa et al. (BNL-E906) Nucl. Phys. A691 (2001) 234c Nucl. Phys. A691 (2001) 234c Yamamoto et al. Prog. Theor. Phys. 106 (2001)363 Prog. Theor. Phys. 106 (2001)363 Ahn et al. Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 214 More experimental data are needed.
15
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 3. G-matrix calculations and the folding procedure G-matrix calculation: use of the renormalized RGM kernel and continuous choice for intermediate spectra Folding procedure: assume simple shell-model wave functions (3N) ( 3 H, 3 He) (0s) 3 =0.18 fm -2 (from charge rms (0s) 4 0.257 fm -2 radius) 12 C(0 + ) (0s) 4 (0p) 8 SU 3 (04) 0.20 fm -2 16 O (0s) 4 (0p) 12 0.16 fm -2 c.m. of B 8 -core system and nonlocality are exactly treated some ambiguities in how to treat the starting energies in the G-matrix eq. k F dependence (density dependence) of the G-matrix is important k F smaller s. p. potential shallower as the result, G-matrix itself becomes more attractive Fujiwara, Kohno and Suzuki, Nucl Phys. A784 (2007) 161
16
2008.9.19 Bled workshop fss2 (cont) N B 8 s. p. potentials in symmetric nuclear matter (k F =1.35 fm -1 )
17
2008.9.19 Bled workshop B 8 s.p. potentials in symmetric nuclear matter (k F =1.35 fm -1 ) FSS (cont) N
18
2008.9.19 Bled workshop fss2
19
2008.9.19 Bled workshop fss2
20
2008.9.19 Bled workshop contents of s.p. potential U (k=0) (k F =1.35 fm - 1 ) (unit : MeV)
21
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Characteristics of the quark-model N interaction I=0I=1 S-waveattractive 1 S 0 < 3 S 1 repulsive 3 S 1 < 1 S 0 P-waveattractive 3 P 0, 1 P 1 attractive 3 P 1, 3 P 2
22
2008.9.19 Bled workshop B 8 interaction by quark-model G-matrix pp G (p, p’; K, , k F ) kq G (k’, q’; K, (q’,K), k F ) kq V (k, q) pp V (p f, p i ) Rq Wigner transform G W (R, q) : Wigner transform U(R)=G W (R, (h 2 /2 )(E-U(R)) Transcendental equation Schrödinger equation Lippmann-Schwinger equation E B, (E) E B, (E) E B W, W (E) k’=p’- p, q’=(p+p’)/2 k=p f - p i, q=(p f +p i )/2 - cluster folding B8B8B8B8 : “ (0s) 4 ” =0.257 fm -2 incident q 1 relative q’ in total c. m. k F =1.20 fm -1 q 1 =q for direct and knock-on kkk=k’kkk=k’ ( )
23
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Transformation formula Folding formula (for direct and knock-on terms) K n case q=q1q=q1
24
E B (exact) - 2.62 - 3.71 - 4.92 0 0.7 0 0.5 0 central < 0 e= -H 0 < 0 =k.e.+U (q 1 ) +U N (q 2 ) k F dependence of central potential
25
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Spin-isospin folding of B 8 (3N) systems (3N) : (0s) 3 =0.18 fm -2 fss2 with k F =1.07 fm -1 Depth of the zero-momentum Wigner transform and E B (MeV)
26
2008.9.19 Bled workshop FSS with k F =1.07 fm -1 (3N) : (0s) 3 =0.18 fm -2 Spin-isospin folding of B 8 (3N) systems Depth of the zero-momentum Wigner transform and E B (MeV)
27
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Bound-state energies of in 3 H, 4 He, 5 He, 13 C and 17 O (12.5 for 16 O)
28
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 5. Characteristics of -core potentials (3N) : 1 2 MeV attraction in the 2 3 fm region : 3 5 MeV attraction around 2 fm, and short-range repulsion 12 C(0 + ), 16 O : an attractive pocket in the R < 1 fm region 2 – 3 MeV attraction in the R 3 fm region repulsion in the intermediate region
29
potentials (G W C (R, 0)) by quark-model G-matrix interactions I=1 I=0 I=1 total I=0 Some attraction in the surface region. FSS fss2
30
(3N) 0 + (T=0) potentials by FSS and fss2
31
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 12 C(0 + ) and 16 O potentials by fss2
32
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 12 C(0 + ) and 16 O potentials by FSS
33
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Scheerbaumpotential (central) : t potential
34
2008.9.19 Bled workshop Scheerbaumpotential (LS) by S B
35
2008.9.19 Bled workshop 6. Summary Characteristics of the N interaction predicted by the quark-model BB interaction N (I=0) the strongest attraction in 1 S 0 channel (effect of the color-magnetic interaction) N (I=0) 3 S 1 0 N (I=1) weak attraction or repulsion in 1 S 0, 3 S 1 channels (cusp effect) P-states are generally weakly attractive ( Wigner type) -core interaction is weakly attractive The attraction in the surface region is the strongest for the potential 12 C(0 + ) and 16 O potentials have attractive pocket in the R < 1 fm region
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.