Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVincent Thompson Modified over 9 years ago
2
Case study Kromhout Barracks Maarten Groothuis
3
The Kromhout Barracks challenge Army Command Headquarters and other MoD units Army Command Headquarters and other MoD units Location Utrecht Location Utrecht Offices for 2000 employees Offices for 2000 employees (+ option for extra 1000) 90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc. 90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc. Services: maintenance, Services: maintenance, catering, security, facility catering, security, facility management, etc. management, etc.
4
Ambitions for the project MoD wants to focus on its core tasks MoD wants to focus on its core tasks Benefiting contractor’s specialised knowledge and experience Benefiting contractor’s specialised knowledge and experience Higher quality (“one stop Higher quality (“one stop shopping”), lower costs shopping”), lower costs
5
Approach Pilot project for PPP in Defence Pilot project for PPP in Defence DBFMO for 25 years DBFMO for 25 years European tender procedure: European tender procedure: – Competitive dialogue – Maximum bid price – Economically most advantageous tender (EMAT) tender (EMAT) Financial scope Financial scope – DCF 335 million € – PPP savings exceed 15% MoD is and will be owner MoD is and will be owner Performance-related availability fee Performance-related availability fee
6
Process Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Procurement guidelines Public Sector Comparator DBFMO Contract Output Specification Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
7
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 Process
8
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 Phase 1 (5 participants) Phase 2 (3 participants) Phase 3 (3 participants) 2007 Process
9
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Process Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April
10
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Summer 2008 Process Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April
11
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Summer 2008 2008 - 2010 Process Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April
12
Preparations Selection Dialogue Final tender Contract close Building Operation Winter 2005 - Summer 2006 Autumn 2006 2007 Final bid: 11 January 2008 Preferred bidder: 2 April Summer 2008 2008 - 2010 2010 - 2035 Process
13
12 Preferred bidder ‘Komfort’ 'AMB Kromhout' (Macquarie Bank, BAM, Arcadis, GTI, Unica and Kraaijvanger Urbis) 'Integra Partners Kromhout' (Heijmans, NIBC Infrastructure, Burgers Ergon, Facilicom, Quadrat and Broekbakema) 'Komfort' (Ballast Nedam, Strukton and John Laing, in cooperation with Meyer en Van Schooten Architecten, Karres en Brands Landschapsarchitecten and ISS Nederland BV.
14
13 Design
15
14 Impression
16
Case study: stakeholder analysis Stakeholder Current position Interests Desired level of engagemen t Defense procurement organization PPP may not undermine our large scale procurement contracts Municipality of Utrecht Use as less ground space as possible. Surplus to be used for new build homes and/or offices. Neighbours Maintain green environment, in future to be crossed by a cycle path Works council Keep support services inside the Defense organization
17
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.