Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byConrad Mills Modified over 9 years ago
1
Configurable Multi-product Floorplanning Qiang Ma, Martin D.F. Wong, Kai-Yuan Chao ASP-DAC 2010
2
Outline Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
3
Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
4
Introduction Conventional ASIC or SoC design floorplan usually targets for one single product; and, high efforts in re-floorplan and re- convergence for different products are still required if there is no pre-design stage multi- product planning Therefore, the problem of designing floorplans at product or market planning stage that simultaneously optimizes multiple products
5
Introduction Traditional floorplanning problem Given a set of rectangles, each with a range of aspect ratio Generate a packing of all the rectangles s.t. The rectangles do not overlap The total area and wire length are minimized
6
Introduction Multi-product Floorplanning Generate a floorplan of enough components (basic blocks) that is configurable for all the products The rectangular region for each product is as small as possible
7
Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
8
Notations Problem input {b 1, b 2, …, b m } be the set of m basic blocks {P 1, P 2, …, P q } be the set of q products [D i 1, D i 2, …, D i m ] T be the Demand Vector D i of P i
9
Notations Cutline a line obtained by extending the interval of a block boundary Valid Region A rectangular region R on a candidate floorplan formed by four Cutlines l, r, t, b (denoted by R(l, r, t, b)) Capacity Vector C R = [C R 1, C R 2, …, C R m ] T of a Valid Region R, where C R j denotes # of basic block b j lying within R Feasible Region R is Feasible for product P i if and only if C R ≧ D i
10
Problem Formulation Multi-product Floorplanning (MPF) Inputs: {b 1, b 2, …, b m } {P 1, P 2, …, P q } Each product P i is associated with a Demand-Vector D i Objective: Generate a floorplan of sufficient basic blocks to accommodate all the q products The total area of the MPF for each product on the resultant floorplan is minimized
11
Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
12
Preprocessing
13
Exact Algorithm
14
Horizontal Scan (H-Scan) Determine a Horizontal Feasible Regions (HFR) for a product Horizontal interval array H is scanned Fix left boundary, shift right boundary until the current region contains sufficient basic blocks
15
Exact Algorithm Horizontal Scan (H-Scan)
16
Exact Algorithm Vertical Scan (V-Scan) Given a HFR(lb, rb), find HFR*(lb, rb) with minimum height Find positions for tb and bb s.t. (bb-tb) is minimum At the beginning, tb = Top-Cutlines[0], bb = Bottom-Cutlines[0] Repeat Shift bb down until R(lb, rb, tb, bb) is feasible Shift tb down until R(lb, rb, tb, bb) is infeasible Record the current height and update the best Until bb is no longer able to be shifted downward
17
Exact Algorithm Vertical Scan (V-Scan)
18
Greedy Heuristic Given a candidate floorplan and a product P i ’s demand vector D i, the greedy heuristic behaves as follows The feasible region R(lb, rb, tb, bb) starts with the whole floorplan Greedily shrink the four boundaries Pick one boundary b and shift it one step towards the center Its shifting reduce R by the most Break the tie by picking the least recently used boundary The feasibility of R is maintained Scan Horizontal interval array H and vertical interval array V Stop when R can not be shrunk any more The resultant region R is a Minimal Feasible Region
19
Greedy Heuristic
20
Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
21
Experimental Results Exact Use the exact algorithm Greedy Use the greedy heuristic Hybrid Applying the greedy heuristic at the first stage and then switching to the exact algorithm at the second stage, when the acceptance ratio drops below a certain value Provide good tradeoff between solution quality and rum time
22
Experimental Results The three method are tested and compared on a set of test cases derived from industrial data
23
Experimental Results
26
Introduction Problem Formulation Methodology Exact Algorithm Greedy Heuristic Experimental Results Conclusions
27
This paper introduced the Multi-product Floorplanning problem Simultaneously design for a family of related products Significantly reduce overall design time and cost First work in literature addressing this problem The effectiveness of this approach is validated by promising results on a set of test cases
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.