1. Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP Coordinator -COMESA skanyarukiga@comesa.int Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP Coordinator -COMESA skanyarukiga@comesa.int The CAADP Investment Programmes Design and Implementation Workshop 20-22 October 2010 Intercontinental Hotel Nairobi, Kenya CAADP IMPLEMENTATION IN COMESA

2. OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION 1. THE COMESA REGION 2. THE CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS MANAGEMENT LEVELS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS 3. CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA COMPACT SIGNATURES POST-COMPACT STATUS QUALITY OF INVESTMENT PLANS 4. COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT OBJECTIVES OF REGIONAL COMPACT CURRENT STATUS 1. THE COMESA REGION 2. THE CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS MANAGEMENT LEVELS CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS 3. CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA COMPACT SIGNATURES POST-COMPACT STATUS QUALITY OF INVESTMENT PLANS 4. COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT OBJECTIVES OF REGIONAL COMPACT CURRENT STATUS

3. I. I. THE COMESA REGION 19 Countries 400 Million people 19 Countries 400 Million people

4. II CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

5. II.1 Management Levels AUC NPCA RECs Country-Led and Owned In –Country Stakeholders (Country Teams, Private Sector, CSOs, Farmers Organizations), DPs etc. AUC NPCA RECs Country-Led and Owned In –Country Stakeholders (Country Teams, Private Sector, CSOs, Farmers Organizations), DPs etc.

6. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks COMPACT SIGNATURES Launch Consultative Process Stocktaking and Growth Options Analysis COMPACT SIGNATURES Launch Consultative Process Stocktaking and Growth Options Analysis

7. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks POST COMPACT PROCESS a. Investment Programmes Quality (Alignment, Consistency, Coherence, Pillars) Expert Inputs Costing Best Practices POST COMPACT PROCESS a. Investment Programmes Quality (Alignment, Consistency, Coherence, Pillars) Expert Inputs Costing Best Practices

8. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks POST COMPACT PROCESS b. Technical Reviews Led by AUC, NPCA, RECs Independent Experts In-Country Consultations and Document Review Technical Review Report POST COMPACT PROCESS b. Technical Reviews Led by AUC, NPCA, RECs Independent Experts In-Country Consultations and Document Review Technical Review Report

9. II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks POST COMPACT PROCESS c. Post-Compact High-Level Business Meeting Presentation of: oInvestment Plans and Budget by Govt oTechnical Review Report oRecommendations for improvement oRoadmap for Improvement oFormulation of Gap Financing Proposals POST COMPACT PROCESS c. Post-Compact High-Level Business Meeting Presentation of: oInvestment Plans and Budget by Govt oTechnical Review Report oRecommendations for improvement oRoadmap for Improvement oFormulation of Gap Financing Proposals

10. III CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA

11. III.1 Compact Signatures COMESA Rwanda – March 2006 Burundi –August 2009 Ethiopia – August 2008 Swaziland March 2010 Uganda – March 2010 Malawi – April 2010 Kenya – July 2010 Tanzania - July 2010 (EAC) COMESA Rwanda – March 2006 Burundi –August 2009 Ethiopia – August 2008 Swaziland March 2010 Uganda – March 2010 Malawi – April 2010 Kenya – July 2010 Tanzania - July 2010 (EAC)

12. III. 1 Compact Signatures Advanced Countries Zambia Zimbabwe Seychelles Djibouti Sudan Zimbabwe Launches DRC Egypt Eritrea Advanced Countries Zambia Zimbabwe Seychelles Djibouti Sudan Zimbabwe Launches DRC Egypt Eritrea

13. III.2 Post Compact Status Technical Reviews Rwanda: December 2009 Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010 Malawi: September 2010 Ethiopia: October 2010 Technical Reviews Rwanda: December 2009 Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010 Malawi: September 2010 Ethiopia: October 2010

14. III.2 Post Compact Status Business Meetings Rwanda: December 2009; gap funding accessed at 80%; USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010) Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010 Next Malawi: Planned for 13-14 October 2010 Ethiopia: Nov/December Tanzania: TR and BM – Nov/Dec 2010 Business Meetings Rwanda: December 2009; gap funding accessed at 80%; USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010) Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010 Next Malawi: Planned for 13-14 October 2010 Ethiopia: Nov/December Tanzania: TR and BM – Nov/Dec 2010

15. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans At Compact Signature Not refined Not well costed Not fully aligned At Business Meetings Significant Improvement Experts Inputs Technical Assistance Specialized Agencies At Compact Signature Not refined Not well costed Not fully aligned At Business Meetings Significant Improvement Experts Inputs Technical Assistance Specialized Agencies

16. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans General Issues of Investment Plans Low capacity of In-Country Teams Insufficient Technical Assistance Inadequate Programme Coherence Imbalances between investment areas and 4 pillars Insufficient consideration of value chain development Coherence between expenditure and economic impact and poverty reduction M&E Framework and implementation modalities General Issues of Investment Plans Low capacity of In-Country Teams Insufficient Technical Assistance Inadequate Programme Coherence Imbalances between investment areas and 4 pillars Insufficient consideration of value chain development Coherence between expenditure and economic impact and poverty reduction M&E Framework and implementation modalities

17. III.3 Quality of Investment Plans Way forward for improved Investment Programmes: 1. Improvement of Quality since development of Post-Compact Roadmap 2. Room for further improvement 3. Focus on Post-Compact resulting in slow down of progress in countries at Pre- Compact Stage Way forward for improved Investment Programmes: 1. Improvement of Quality since development of Post-Compact Roadmap 2. Room for further improvement 3. Focus on Post-Compact resulting in slow down of progress in countries at Pre- Compact Stage

18. IV COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT

19. IV.1 Objective of Regional Compact AUC/NEPAD Recommendation Add value to National CAADP Compact Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest e.g. Trans-boundary and multi – country areas Increased involvement of private sector, PPPs and development partners To forge regional cooperation and integration AUC/NEPAD Recommendation Add value to National CAADP Compact Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries cannot effectively invest e.g. Trans-boundary and multi – country areas Increased involvement of private sector, PPPs and development partners To forge regional cooperation and integration

20. IV.2 Current Status Draft Regional Compact Document is ready since early September Major Areas: Agriculture Commodities along the Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity, value addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels (Farmers, Trader, processors etc. ) Next Steps Extension into Tripartite Framework – COMESA, EAC, SADC Draft Regional Compact Document is ready since early September Major Areas: Agriculture Commodities along the Value Chains Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity, value addition and trade Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels (Farmers, Trader, processors etc. ) Next Steps Extension into Tripartite Framework – COMESA, EAC, SADC

21. Thank you!