1. Opportunities and constraints for development and translation of digital learning resources How difficult is it to translate or adjust existing digital learning resources? Swedish study Krister Widell, Metamatrix christina.szekely@skolverket.se

2. Good portability – ”travels well”

3. Portability With how much effort can resources be translated adjusted edited further developed accessed recycled copied transferred downloaded ????

4. How important is the file format? HtmlPDF FlashOffice SVGVideo JavaIWB

5. Flash celebrate.ls.no//Norsk/Animasjoner/NMfag/Male_ohmXL.swf difficult to translate or transform

6. SVG kollakallan.skolverket.se/upphovsratt/creativecommons/attdela/ easy to translate or transform

7. ZIP archive of: the original SVG images high quality PNG images the script in plain text the Scribus document used to generate the PDFScribus Page 1 (svg)svg Page 2 (svg)svg Page 3 (svg)svg Page 4 (svg)svg http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Sharing_Creative_Works

8. Java phet.colorado.edu/simulations/sims.php?sim=Balloons_and_Buoyancy difficult to translate or transform

9. Pdf dev.ecweb.is/skolavefurinn/upload/files/attachments/enska/hofundar/gu erber/26_chapter_text.pdf difficult to translate or transform

10. Interactive whiteboards The use of proprietary file formats prevents collaboration and sharing of learning resources, both within and between schools.

11. Video Good portability for video learning resources requires: Editable audio and video Support for editable subtitles Editable metadata included in the file The ability to tag and refer to sections and chapters with metadata

12. Recommendations - reflect on the need for portability Who will use the learning resources? Are there any additional groups beyond the primary users? How is the ICT environment organized? How do we handle accessibility for disabled users? Are we using the optimal file formats or are we working by routine? Are we using open source software and open file formats? Is it possible to make the source files available? If no source files are being available, can we tell the users how the textual content is made accessible (e.g. readme files)? Is it possible to describe the technical portability by using some metadata standard? Did we follow good programming habits when we created the learning resources? How does the technical structure of a learning resource look like? Is it built modularly, with small, independent objects or is it built into a unified whole? Should it be possible to download, translate and develop the resource? Is form and design more important than the level of portability? Copyright issues?

13. Responsible authorities should develop, publish and distribute information about the significance of technical formats when creating digital learning resources. Standardization efforts should be supported. Opportunities and constraints for development and translation of digital learning resources