1. Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 GRADUATE PROGRAM CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING AND ASSESSMENT PROCESSES EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND GRADUATE PROGRAM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL DECIDES TO RECOMMEND GRADUATE PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER REQUEST FOR PROGRAM GRADUATE AND/OR CIBED DIRECTORS ASSESSMENT OF FEASIBILITY COMPATIBILITY WITH COLLEGE MISSION CHAIR ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT ABILITY TO STAFF GRADUATE CIT REVIEWS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY ADMISSION PLAN STAFFING PROCESS GRADUATE CIT REVIEWS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY ADMISSION PLAN STAFFING PROCESS STAGE 1: PROGRAM APPROVAL GRADUATE CI TEAM INPUT PROPOSAL FOR NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM OR NEW INTAKE OF EXISTING PROGRAM RATIONALE DEMAND ANALYSIS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY TIMELINE ADMISSIONS PLAN STAFFING NEEDS STAFFING PROCESS BUDGET ESTIMATES PROPOSAL FOR NEW GRADUATE PROGRAM OR NEW INTAKE OF EXISTING PROGRAM RATIONALE DEMAND ANALYSIS CURRICULUM MODEL MODE OF DELIVERY TIMELINE ADMISSIONS PLAN STAFFING NEEDS STAFFING PROCESS BUDGET ESTIMATES APPROVAL FROM C of B FACULTY U.C.C. O.B.O.R. AS APPROPRIATE APPROVAL FROM C of B FACULTY U.C.C. O.B.O.R. AS APPROPRIATE YES OU GRAD COUNCIL (NEW PROGRAM) OU GRAD COUNCIL (NEW PROGRAM) RECOMMENDATIONS

2. Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 DEPARTMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS (IF COMMITTEE EXISTS) PROGRAM DIRECTOR SENDS OUT A REQUEST FOR FACULTY INTEREST (INCLUDING SELECTION CRITERIA) PROGRAM DIRECTOR SENDS OUT A REQUEST FOR FACULTY INTEREST (INCLUDING SELECTION CRITERIA) MIX OF NEW AND EXPERIENCED FACULTY DEPARTMENT CHAIR SELECTS FACULTY TO RECOMMEND DEPARTMENT CHAIR SELECTS FACULTY TO RECOMMEND PROGRAM DIRECTOR ACCEPTS FACULTY OR EXPRESSES CONCERNS PROGRAM DIRECTOR ACCEPTS FACULTY OR EXPRESSES CONCERNS FACULTY DEVELOPMENT GOALS FACULTY CREDENTIALS/ EXPERIENCE FIT WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROGRAM FIT WITH SELECTION CRITERIA STAGE 2: FACULTY SELECTION FACULTY EXPRESS INTEREST TO DEPARTMENT CHAIR FACULTY EXPRESS INTEREST TO DEPARTMENT CHAIR DEPARTMENTAL RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS PAST FACULTY EVALUATION CONCERNS GRAD CIT INFORMED OF SELECTED FACULTY TEAM GRAD CIT INFORMED OF SELECTED FACULTY TEAM PROGRAM DIRECTOR SELECTS EXTERNAL FACULTY SUBJECT TO DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL NO CoB FACULTY ABLE OR WILLING TO STAFF SLOT CoB NON-CoB FACULTY RATIO EXECUTIVE COUNCIL RESOLVES CONCERNS EXECUTIVE COUNCIL RESOLVES CONCERNS RECONSIDER PROGRAM /INTAKE FEASIBILITY STRATEGIC ISSUES CANNOT USE OUTSIDE STAFF USE OUTSIDE STAFF APPROVED NONCoB FACULTY SELECTED FACULTY UNRESOLVED CONCERNS ACCEPTED CoB FACULTY APPROVED CoB FACULTY EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CONSIDERS USING OUTSIDE STAFF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CONSIDERS USING OUTSIDE STAFF NO APPROVED NONCoB FACULTY NOT APPROVED INPUT FROM DIRECTOR OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS

3. Approved 1/26/2001 – Revised 11/26/2002 PROGRAM CURRICULUM MODEL AND MODE OF DELIVERY PROGRAM DIRECTOR REPORT STRATEGIC VALUE OF PROGRAM ADMISSION / GRADUATION STATS RECORD OF STAFFING USED PROGRAM ADVISORY GROUP FEEDBACK STAGE 3: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FACULTY TEAM DEVELOPS AND DELIVERS PROJECT / COURSE COMPONENTS FACULTY TEAM DEVELOPS AND DELIVERS PROJECT / COURSE COMPONENTS GRADUATE CIT RECOMMENDATION CONTINUE AS IS CONTINUE WITH SPECIFIED MODIFICATIONS TERMINATE PROGRAM GRADUATE CIT RECOMMENDATION CONTINUE AS IS CONTINUE WITH SPECIFIED MODIFICATIONS TERMINATE PROGRAM PROGRAM DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE COUNCIL CoB FACULTY GRADUATE CIT ASSESSES PROGRAM NEW PROGRAM AFTER YEAR 1 CONTINUING PROGRAM EVERY 3 YEARS GRADUATE CIT ASSESSES PROGRAM NEW PROGRAM AFTER YEAR 1 CONTINUING PROGRAM EVERY 3 YEARS CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CURRICULUM OR DELIVERY FACULTY TEACHING IN PROGRAM STUDENT FEEDBACK EXIT SURVEY DESIGNED BY GRAD CIT, PROGRAM FACULTY AND DIRECTOR PROGRAM ASSESSMENT DATA COLLECTED PROGRAM ASSESSMENT DATA COLLECTED EXTERNAL REVIEW PANEL INCLUDES 3 NON-COB FACULTY 1 BUSINESS PERSON 1 ALUMNUS EXTERNAL REVIEW PANEL INCLUDES 3 NON-COB FACULTY 1 BUSINESS PERSON 1 ALUMNUS