Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

FZU 30.5.061 Comparison of Mn doped GaAs, ZnSe, and LiZnAs dilute magnetic semiconductors J.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F. Máca, and T. Jungwirth.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "FZU 30.5.061 Comparison of Mn doped GaAs, ZnSe, and LiZnAs dilute magnetic semiconductors J.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F. Máca, and T. Jungwirth."— Presentation transcript:

1 FZU 30.5.061 Comparison of Mn doped GaAs, ZnSe, and LiZnAs dilute magnetic semiconductors J.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F. Máca, and T. Jungwirth

2 FZU 30.5.062 Introduction: A II B VI vs. A III B V DMS New proposition: Li(Zn,Mn)As Basic picture: scaling of Tc in (Ga,Mn)As Comparison of (Zn,Mn)Se, (Ga,Mn)As, and Li(Zn,Mn)As based on density functional calculations Li(Zn,Mn)As – a detailed study Conclusions

3 FZU 30.5.063 (A II,Mn)B VI DMS (Cd,Mn)Te, (Zn,Mn)Se Isovalent substitution of Mn(A II ) Mn atoms neutral, with spin 5/2 Wide concentration range of alloys Intrinsic semiconductors (may not be the case for other transition metals)

4 FZU 30.5.064 (A II,Mn)B VI DMS … cont. Giant AF splitting of the valence band: E v (↑)>E v (↓) Antiferromagnetic exchange coupling of local moments (superexchange) Complicated phase diagram due to frustration … semimagnetic semicond. Ferromagnetic state achieved only in strongly n- type doped materials

5 FZU 30.5.065 (A III,Mn)B V DMS (Ga,Mn)As, (Ga,Mn)N Non-isovalent substitution of Mn(A III ) Limited range of alloying (x<0.1) Mn acts as single acceptor Without extra doping, (Ga,Mn)As is p-type semiconductor (E F ~ E v – 0.2eV) Local moment 5/2 + hole spin -1/2

6 FZU 30.5.066 (A III,Mn)B V DMS … cont. Strong ferromagnetic RKKY interaction of local moments due to free carriers Ferromagnetic state with T c <170K (T c increases with both x and h) Superexchange seems unimportant and is usually neglected Troubles with selfcompensation (Mn ( int ) )

7 FZU 30.5.067 Open problems Limitations of T c Dependence of T c on x and density of carriers from the microscopic theory The role of superexchange in (Ga,Mn)As Possibility of n-type FM semiconductors Optimization of the host materials

8 FZU 30.5.068 Proposition: Li(Zn,Mn)As Band structure of LiZnAs similar to ZnSe and GaAs a(LiZnAs)= 5.815Å, a(GaAs)= 5.642 Å → hybridization Easy substitution of Mn for Zn expected Number of carriers related to non-stoichiometry in Li sublattice (vac (Li) =acceptor, Li (int) =donor)

9 FZU 30.5.069 Basic picture sp 3 bands + Anderson Hamiltonian for 3d 5 -states of Mn Spin-orbit interaction neglected CPA description of the mixed crystal in the FM state E rev ≡ energy of flipping a single atomic moment In mean-field approximation, T c ~ E rev.

10 FZU 30.5.0610

11 FZU 30.5.0611 Preliminary results for (Ga,Mn)As General scaling rule: T c /x ≈ f(n/x) T c <0 for |n|<x/4 … superexchange important ! Saturation of T c for n ≈ -x FM state (T c >0) possible for both p-type and n- type !

12 FZU 30.5.0612 Detailed density-functional study LMTO-CPA, LDA (partly LDA+U) Supporting calculations: FP LAPW Densities of states & distribution of Mn d-states in (Zn,Mn)Se, (Ga,Mn)As, and Li(Zn,Mn)As Mean-field T c in rigid-band approximation T c in realistic, co-doped DMS

13 FZU 30.5.0613 DOS: (Ga,Mn)As vs. (Zn,Mn)As

14 FZU 30.5.0614 DOS: (Zn,Mn)Se vs. Li(Zn,Mn)As

15 FZU 30.5.0615 Curie temperature: rigid-band approx.

16 FZU 30.5.0616 Curie temperature: co-doped DMS

17 FZU 30.5.0617

18 FZU 30.5.0618 Summary Dependence of T c (n) similar in all (Ga,Mn)As, (Zn,Mn)Se, and Li(Zn,Mn)As: no difference of II-VI and III-V DMS Superexchange → unstable FM state for low concentration of carriers n-type ferromagnetic DMS available at high concentration of donors Seems realistic only in Li(Zn,Mn)As

19 FZU 30.5.0619 Li(Zn,Mn)As – more details Problems: Microscopic nature of Li non-stoichiometry (vac (Li) and Li (int), Li (Zn) and Zn (Li) ) Limits of solubility of Mn in LiZnAs Mn solubility in non-stoichiometric material

20 FZU 30.5.0620 Substitution of Mn for Zn not affected by non-stoichiometry

21 FZU 30.5.0621 Large formation energies of vac (Li) and Zn (Li) → substoichoimetry unprobable

22 FZU 30.5.0622 Both Li (int) and Li (Zn) possible, leading to either n- or p-type material

23 FZU 30.5.0623 Dynamical equilibrium Principal defects in Li(Zn,Mn)As: Mn (Zn), Li (Zn),and Li (int) Formation energies E s,i (x s,x i ) of Li (Zn) and Li (int) as functions of partial concentrations x s and x i. Balanced state: E s (x s,x i ) = E i (x s,x i ).

24 FZU 30.5.0624

25 FZU 30.5.0625 Partial concentrations of Li (Zn) and Li (int)

26 FZU 30.5.0626 Conclusions Both p-type and n-type ferromagnetic DMS possible with suitable doping of III-V, II-VI, and I-II-V DMS AFM exchange in compensated materials Electron-mediated FM: disorder-induced reconstruction of CB + partial occuparion of side minima + strong admixture of d-states (unclear) Li-rich Li(Zn,Mn)As seems a good candidate for n-type FM semiconductor.


Download ppt "FZU 30.5.061 Comparison of Mn doped GaAs, ZnSe, and LiZnAs dilute magnetic semiconductors J.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F. Máca, and T. Jungwirth."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google