Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Simulations and tests for PIPERADE P. Ascher, K. Blaum, M. Heck, S. Naimi Piperade Meeting, 27 th -28 th May 2013, Bordeaux.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Simulations and tests for PIPERADE P. Ascher, K. Blaum, M. Heck, S. Naimi Piperade Meeting, 27 th -28 th May 2013, Bordeaux."— Presentation transcript:

1 Simulations and tests for PIPERADE P. Ascher, K. Blaum, M. Heck, S. Naimi Piperade Meeting, 27 th -28 th May 2013, Bordeaux

2 SImultaneous Magnetron and resonant COnversion - Dipolar excitation at the magnetron frequency - - Quadrupolar excitation at ( + +  - ) for the conversion of the radial modes M. Rosenbusch et al, Int. J. M. Spec., 325-327, 51-57 (2012) M. Kretzchmar, Int. J. M. Spec., 325-327, 30-44 (2012) One SIMCO conversion Allows to center the ions selectively without buffer gas -> prevents charge-exchange reactions and damping of the motion that decreases mass resolving power R+R+ R-R- SIMCO excitation: Introduction

3 SIMCO excitation Advantages of SIMCO  No Buffer gas  Mass independent (like BG)  Same selectivity as a quadrupole excitation (same resolution for a given time) BUT for BG cooling a magnetron exc and a cooling time afterwards are needed! → SIMCO is faster (for a given time, SIMCO has a higher resolving power)  Contaminants are brought further compared to the ions of interest, the contaminants can even leave the trap (depends on the magnetron exc parameters…)

4 SIMCO excitation vs BG Cooling SIMCO Exc during 60ms Mag Exc during 4 ms + Quad Exc during 60ms + Cooling time of 100 ms P=1e-4 mbar Time (ms) R+, R- (mm)R (mm) R+, R- (mm)R (mm) Time (ms) 2 ions species: 136 Te, 136 Sb

5 SIMCO excitation vs BG Cooling SIMCO Exc during 60ms Mag Exc during 4 ms + Quad Exc during 60ms + Cooling time of 100 ms P=1e-4 mbar Time (ms) R+, R- (mm) R (mm)

6 SIMCO excitation What is tricky with SIMCO…  One conversion is needed (exactly), time excitation is crucial!  Ions probe radial anharmonicities of the E/B fields during the exc (like BG)  No Buffer gas  Initial conditions crucial! (in particular radial dispersion) this is not a cooling method, the conditions at the end will not be better than before

7 During the excitation, the ions probe radial anharmonicities of the trap (B field inhomogeneities) B 2 =5.6 (corresponding to an homogeneity of 10 ppm over 5 mm) B 2 =0.3 (corresponding to an homogeneity of 5ppm over 5 mm) -> WITCH Magnet (Oxford) Time (ms) R (mm)

8 B 2 =5.6 (corresponding to an homogeneity of 10 ppm over 5 mm) R (mm) Time (ms)

9 SIMCO excitation What is tricky with SIMCO…  One conversion is needed (exactly), time excitation is crucial!  Ions probe radial anharmonicities of the E/B fields during the exc (like BG)  No Buffer gas  Initial conditions crucial! (in particular radial dispersion) this is not a cooling method, the conditions at the end will not be better than before

10 Inittial conditions are crucial! Radial dispersion But if they are all off-centered this is ok because we can change the phase… R (mm) R 0 = 1 mmR 0 = 2 mm R 0 = 3 mm Time (ms)

11 SIMCO excitation: Simulations Initial magnetron motion? R+(t), R-(t)  mag.motion -  mag.exc  = -  /2  = 0 SIMCO excitation during 15 ms R+(t), R-(t)

12 Initial conditions Z direction B 2 =0.3 (corresponding to 10 ppm over 3 cm)B 2 =3 (correspondingto 100 ppm over 3 cm)  z= 30 mm R (mm) Time (ms)

13 Increasing the number of ions… the main problem is the shielding effect Initial conditions (  x,  y,  z ) = (0.5 mm, 0.5 mm, 15 mm) 512 ions Scaling factor of 2: ~ 1000 contaminants 2 ions of interest Initial conditions (  x,  y,  z ) = (0.5 mm, 0.5 mm, 2 mm) R (mm) Time (ms) R+, R- (mm)

14 Tests at MPIK Quadrupolar excitation SIMCO excitation Time (ms) R+, R- (mm) Time (ms)

15 Tests with MCP detection An aperture was installed after the trap in order to see a count-rate resonance, but it was not possible to shoot through the aperture -> Initial magnetron motion too high…. A phosphore screen detector was installed -> Beam not aligned What is crucial to improve: the tilted magnetic field and the injection in the trap:  Magnetic field: An engineer from BRUKER will come in the next weeks to shim again the magnet  Injection: the RFQ is designed and built, still electronics has to be developed… SIMION simulations of the RFQ in progress Tests @ MPIK

16 SIMCO tests in the preparation trap: - We need to use the RFQ to have good conditions - No vacuum possible if we use the RFQ FIrst tests of SIMCO will be done in the measurement trap: No aperture after the second trap but position-sensitive detector (even better!) First of all is to look at the beam spot position depending on the excitation time and at the same time the TOF as a function of the exc time The method will be investigated up to 100 ions (very high number of ions for SHIPTRAP) Tests @ SHIPTRAP/GSI


Download ppt "Simulations and tests for PIPERADE P. Ascher, K. Blaum, M. Heck, S. Naimi Piperade Meeting, 27 th -28 th May 2013, Bordeaux."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google