Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

01.10.2015 Weekly Meeting HE,HB and HF RadDam Analysis with 2015 pp Data Semiray Girgis, Hasan Huseyin Isik, Ilknur Baldan, Yalcin Guler, Shuichi Kunori,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "01.10.2015 Weekly Meeting HE,HB and HF RadDam Analysis with 2015 pp Data Semiray Girgis, Hasan Huseyin Isik, Ilknur Baldan, Yalcin Guler, Shuichi Kunori,"— Presentation transcript:

1 01.10.2015 Weekly Meeting HE,HB and HF RadDam Analysis with 2015 pp Data Semiray Girgis, Hasan Huseyin Isik, Ilknur Baldan, Yalcin Guler, Shuichi Kunori, Eda Eskut, Isa Dumanoglu 1

2 2 - 2015 Raddiation Damage Study  HE Raddam Results  HB Raddam Results  HF Raddam Results - Conclusions Content

3 CMSSW_7_4_8_patch1 is used. HLT_Mu20_v* Energy Cuts: 2 Time < 15 ns. Run Information Run Number Date Time magnetic Field İnjection scheme 251562 252116 254790 256171 2015.07.12 2015.07.20 2015.08.21 2015.09.08 4h. 40 min. 1h. 5h. 8min. 5h. 17 min. 3.8T 0T 3.8T 0T 50ns_296b_254_36_246_36bpi11inj 50ns_482b_420_32_397_72bpi11inj 25ns_315b_303_270_276_72bpi9inj 25ns_459b_447_351_372_72bpi11inj 3 NOTE : Above information is for HE and HB Raddam analysis

4 4 Energy cut 2 GeV Comparison results for HE

5 5 HE_50ns vs 25ns Minus (0T) Ratio= 256171(25ns)/252116(50ns) 50 ns 25 ns

6 6 HE_50ns vs 25ns Plus(0T) Ratio= 256171(25ns)/252116(50ns)

7 7 HE_50ns vs 25ns Minus(3.8T) Ratio= 254790(25ns)/251562(50ns)

8 8 HE_50ns vs 25ns Plus (3.8T) Ratio= 254790(25ns)/251251(50ns)

9 9 Muon_Pt r256171 B=0T 25ns r254790 B=3.8T 25ns r252116 B=0T 50ns r251562 B=3.8T 50ns

10 10 Energy cut 2 GeV Comparison results for HB

11 11 HB_50ns vs 25ns Minus (0T)

12 12 HB_50ns vs 25ns Plus(0T)

13 13 HB_50ns vs 25ns Minus(3.8T)

14 14 HB_50ns vs 25ns Plus (3.8T)

15 15 HF comparison results

16 Run Information Run Number magnetic Field İnjection scheme Data Sets 251721 254879 256866 3.8T 50ns_476b_414_32_397_72bpi10inj 25ns_458b_446_360_372_48bpi13inj 25ns_1177b_1165_1080_1110_144bpi11inj /ExpressPhysics/Run2015B-Express-v1/FEVT /ExpressPhysics/Run2015C-Express-v1/FEVT /ExpressPhysics/Run2015D-Express-v1/FEVT 16 CMSSW_7_4_8_patch1 is used. Energy Cuts: 2 GeV -10 < Time < +15 ns. We did not use any trigger for HF

17 17 HF_Depth1_Minus (3.8T)

18 18 HF_Depth2_Minus (3.8T)

19 19 HF_Depth1_Plus (3.8T)

20 20 HF_Depth2_Plus (3.8T)

21 21 Conclusion This week we analysed some 2015 runs which are taken at 3.8 T and 0 T for 25ns and 50 ns using HLT_Mu20_v* trigger, and we tried to understand the differences between runs. When we plotted the histograms we added ratio plots using 2GeV energy cut. Shuichi requested to extend raddam analysis including HF subdetector. After now we will continue to do this analysis for HF too. This week we focused on the specific runs. Next week we are planning to focus on 2015 A-B-C-D full data samples. When we have enough statistics we can give more information and we can show latest results about this analysis. THANKS!


Download ppt "01.10.2015 Weekly Meeting HE,HB and HF RadDam Analysis with 2015 pp Data Semiray Girgis, Hasan Huseyin Isik, Ilknur Baldan, Yalcin Guler, Shuichi Kunori,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google