2. 1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7Diffraction Water waves Water waves Light waves Light waves Fraunhofer diffraction Fraunhofer diffraction

3. 2 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 57) Diffraction of water waves Parallel ripples in a ripple tank passing through a narrow gap whose width is less than the wavelength of the ripples. The ripples that pass through the gap are nearly circular and seem to originate from a point source situated in the gap.

4. 3 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 57) Diffraction of water waves Ripples of the same wavelength passing through a wider gap. The ripples that pass through are almost straight except for some bending at the edges. The wider the gap, the less the bending becomes.

5. 4 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 57) Diffraction of water waves around an obstacle A smaller “shadow” region is obtained when the size of the obstacle is comparable to the wavelength. That is, its diffraction is greater than that of larger obstacle. small obstaclelarge obstacle

6. 5 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 57) Diffraction of light Because the wavelength of light is very short, the diffraction of light waves is noticeable only if the aperture is very small. For this reason shadows are formed. Sound waves, however, are able to go round objects because of their long wavelength.

7. 6 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 58) Light waves – diffraction by a narrow slit The central maximum is of a high intensity and very broad compared to the other maxima.

8. 7 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 58) Light waves – diffraction by a knife edge If a knife edge is held up against monochromatic light, the diffraction of light waves round the knife edge produced the pattern as shown.

9. 8 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 59) Fraunhofer diffraction Fraunhofer diffraction is the diffraction of light produced by a narrow slit when plane light waves are incident normally on the slit and light waves emerging from the slit are plane waves.

10. 9 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 59) Fraunhofer diffraction - explanation For the point O on the screen and lying on the axis of the slit QO, there is no path difference for waves coming from pairs of points such as A and B or X and Y. Hence, constructive interference occurs at O and a maximum is obtained.

11. 10 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 60) Fraunhofer diffraction - explanation If  is the angle between QP and the axis of the slit QO, then angle AQM is also . In triangle AMQ, If the angle  is small, sin   , the first minimum is obtained when Similarly, all the other minima occur at angle  n when n = 1, 2, 3…

12. 11 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 61) Minima (or dark fringes) are also formed on the other side of the axis. In between the dark fringes (minima) are bright fringes (maxima). The central maximum is of highest intensity and the other maxima are of much lower intensities as shown. Fraunhofer diffraction - explanation

13. 12 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 62) Changes in slit width - decrease If the width of slit (a) decreases, from the equation the angle θ increases as wavelength λ is constant. This means that a broader central maximum is obtained but the intensity of all the bright fringes decreases as less light passes through the slit.

14. 13 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Changes in slit width - decrease 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 62) The figure shows the diffraction pattern of a narrow slit of width It shows that the intensity at the point O drops to I o when the slit width is halved. On the other hand, the width of the central maximum is doubled. In usual situation, less bright fringes are observed because the intensity of the secondary bright fringes drops below that detectable by the eye.

15. 14 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 62) Changes in slit width - increase If the width of the slit increases, the width of the central maximum decreases but its intensity increases. When the slit becomes very wide compared to the wavelength λ, the angle θ is almost zero. That is, only the part of the screen directly in front of the slit is illuminated. This explains the rectilinear propagation of light.

16. 15 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Changes in slit width - decrease 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 62) The figure shows the diffraction obtained when the slit width is doubled. Go to Example 7 Example 7 Go to Example 8 Example 8

17. 16 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. End

18. 17 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Q : Q : In the diffraction pattern of a single slit, the separation between the first minimum on one side and the first minimum on the other side is 5.2 mm. The distance of the screen from the slit is 80.0 cm and the wavelength of light used is 546 nm. What is the width of the slit? Solution 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 63)

19. 18 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Solution: Solution: Distance between first minimum and the central maximum x = (5.2) mm = 2.6 × 10  3 m Using the equation,  = (since  is small) and  =  =  Slit width, a = = = 1.68 × 10  4 m Return to Text 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 63)

20. 19 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Q : Q : What is the angular separation between the first minimum and the central maximum for a diffraction pattern of a single slit if the slit width is equal to (a) 1 wavelength, (b) 5 wavelengths and (c) 10 wavelengths? Solution 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 63)

21. 20 © Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Solution: Solution: Since the slit width a is comparable to λ, the equation sinθ = is used rather than θ =. The equation θ = is used when the slit width a is large compared to λ. (a) When a = λ, sinθ= = = 1  Angular separation, θ = 90  (b) When a = 5λ, sinθ= = = 0.2  Angular separation, θ = 11.54  (c) When a = 10λ, sinθ= = = 0.1  Angular separation, θ = 5.74  Return to Text 9.7 Diffraction (SB p. 63)