Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMonica Anne Quinn Modified over 9 years ago
2
Visioning 2 Committee
3
15,800 by 2018
4
JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research and Data Management DavidSchusterLibraryLyndaMurphyTeaching and Learning with Technology HeatherSpeedStudent LifeMarshaNeville-SmithOT-Dallas LizabethSpoontsDental HygieneRobinPiper-JohnsonUniversity Advancement RobinTomsNursing-Houston PamYoungbloodSOA-Music AmyO'KeefeCommuter Services 24 JoeBerthiaumeHousing RobertPlacidoOffice of TechnologyErmaNieto-BrechtAdmissions CatlinRodgersLibraryMarthaRewNutrition and Food Sciences KatieRoseFamily SciencesGayleRouxNursing TeresaStarrettTeacher EducationSandraWestermorelandBiology MariTietzeNursing-Dallas PamWilsonFinance and Administration
13
Faculty Performance Review Task Force
14
Ron Hovis, Interim Chair, School of Management, and Special Assistant to Academic Affairs Jennifer Martin, Senior Associate Provost Co-Chairs
15
Annual Review Promotion Tenure Post-Tenure Review Faculty Performance Review Components
16
–Review TWU policies on faculty performance review and recommend revisions –Resolve ambiguities in current evaluation processes –Recommend additional approaches beyond student course evaluations to evaluate instructional effectiveness –Explore possibilities for reducing workloads associated with conducting performance reviews –Make recommendations regarding the possibility of adopting teaching and research faculty performance tracks, including criteria for each track Tasks
17
10 faculty including 4 Faculty Senate members 2 Council of Chairs representatives Representatives from Dallas, Denton, and Houston Task Force Membership
18
Research performance review policies and practices at peer universities Review literature on faculty performance review topics Survey faculty perceptions of current TWU performance review policies and practices Develop recommendations for policies and procedures Conduct faculty focus groups on recommendations Communicate with faculty throughout the process so that recommendations are viable when presented Methodology
19
Performance review systems Methods for assessing teaching effectiveness Faculty performance tracks Summer 2014 Plan of Work: Subcommittees
20
April, 2015 Time Line for Completion
21
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
22
What is a MOOC? A scalable internet-based course that provides structure, a social environment, and automated feedback on learning that is free to everyone with no expectation of direct interaction with an instructor. MOOC COMMITTEE
23
–Are MOOCs an opportunity for TWU? Summer bridge programs –Do MOOCs pose a threat to TWU? Reducing paid-for courses –Should TWU offer credit for MOOCs? How should TWU award credit? How will TWU measure quality for accreditation? MOOC IMPORTANCE
24
6 Staff members 4 Faculty members Representatives from Dallas, Denton, and Houston COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
25
Complete a full MOOC Course - Completed Survey TWU faculty - Completed Review of the literature – In process Survey peer institutions – Summer 2014 Compose a report for the Provost – Fall 2014 Plan of Work
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.