1. S.Stapnes1 European Detector R&D and FP7 - Outline  Background –New call for IAs (Integrated Activities) in November – it is in fact expected tomorrow with deadline 29.2.2008. ESGARD preparing proposal for accelerator R&D (as follow up to CARE) for this call IA potentially also very useful for infrastructures related to common R&D – for detector development for SLHC, Linear Colliders, Neutrinos, etc. –also in this area we need coordination to set our own priorities, to improve our chances for success, –and also in this area we can benefit from better coherency/communication among all the actors in the field EUDET a successful example in FP6 for detector R&D as supported by such a program  Progress since last meeting  Outline of application  Next steps

2. S.Stapnes2 European Detector R&D and FP7 – WEB- information  WEB page at: http://project-fp7-detectors.web.cern.ch/project-FP7- detectors/Default.htmhttp://project-fp7-detectors.web.cern.ch/project-FP7- detectors/Default.htm

3. S.Stapnes3 A European Coordination Group for Detector R&D in the FP7 programs:  The successful model for such a group is ESGARD covering accelerator R&D.  For detector R&D the activities are much more widely distributed and the major stakeholders are the main experiments being planned for SLHC, Linear Collider (EUDET), Neutrino and Flavour physics.  It is therefore suggested to create a COORDINATION GROUP with representatives for these planned experiments plus CERN and DESY. The believe is that most of the European detector R&D are focused and organised as part of these collaborations or proto-collaborations.  The detector R&D coordination group must also have effective links to ESGARD to make sure the plans concerning submissions to EU programs in the areas of accelerator R&D and detector R&D are coherent.  The current composition of the group is: –Joachim Mnich, EUDET (Linaer Collider Detectors) –Nigel Hessey and Jordan Nash, upgrade coordinators ATLAS, CMS –Lucie Linssen representing CERN –Rolf Heuer representing DESY –Alain Blondel representing neutrino detectors –Francesco Forti representing flavour factory detectors –One person from ESGARD (or/and frequent communication ESGARD)  The group is lead by Norman McCubbin and Steinar Stapnes.

4. S.Stapnes4 National Contacts The National Contact Group ia a reference group with national representatives. The detector R&D is very widely distributed activity with many potential project partners, during this process it is important to have discussion partners in each European country that can:  Help to identify the major detector R&D activities in each country  Help to identify one (or a few) potential contract partners for EU proposals in the area of detector R&D (this could typically be national labs taking on coordination roles within one country, or a lead institute)  Provide guidance to the Coordination Group during the planning phase (mails and information concerning the coordination groups work will be distributed to these national contacts). Names identified by RECFA representatives (and if not received the RECFA representative is used): Switzerland: Martin Pohl Germany: Lutz Feld Slovakia: Miroslav Pikna Spain: Carlos Lacasta Portugal: Paula Bordalo Netherlands: Els Koffeman Israel: Giora Mikenberg Czech Republic: Vaclav Vrba Poland: Filip Zarnecki Austria: Manfred Krammer Finland: Kenneth.Osterberg and Eija.Tuominen Hungary: Gyorgy Bencze Sweden: Richard Brenner Norway: Steinar Stapnes Denmark: Peter Hansen Italy: Massimo Caccia UK: Norman McCubbin Belgium: Eduardo Cortina Gil Bulgaria: Jordan Stamenov France: Roy Aleksan (need to change) Greece: Theodoros Alexopoulus

5. S.Stapnes5 Call for IAs - summary  IA: Integrated Activities... must combine three elements: networking, trans-national access (TNA) and joint research activities (JRA).  Used successfully and creatively by EUDET in FP6 to support test-beams and other common infrastructures for the R&D and integration activities, building some of the prototypes (used as part of infrastructures), and to provide travel funds for participants – for ILC detector R&D. 30+ participating institutions and 60+ FTEs … 7 MEURO budget.  Also used by CARE for accelerator R&D of course  The IA call will be on 30 November, deadline 29 February 2008 and then again in 2010. These calls are for both the traditional IA activities and also the new Thematic IAs.  Scope 277 MEURO.  Typical size, 4-6 MEURO with 20 participants, can increase to 10-15 MEURO in special cases with more participants, for 4 years (2009-2012)  Expected to have similar structures to I3s in FP6 (as used by EUDET and CARE)

6. S.Stapnes6 Agendas Link to meeting agenda and slides available: http://indico.cern.ch/categoryDisplay.py?categId=1696

7. S.Stapnes7 Proposal strategy  Priorities: 1.Common detector R&D facilities needed 2009-2012 (as identified by representatives of the coordination group)  Testbeams, Irradiation facilities, Electronics development tools, Software tools - focus on items/projects which adapt them to next detector R&D stage 2.SLHC detector R&D facilities  Adaptation of the facilities/tools for SLHC detector R&D 3.Linear Collider Detector R&D facilities  Focus on facilities that allow follow up of EUDET (combined set up and testing of detectors), plus related electronics, software and detector integration tools 4.Neutrino detector Detector R&D facilities  Study of detector elements in testbeams, electronics and software development, detector integration tools 5.SuperB (mostly covered by above)  Testbeam measurements, irradiations, detectors and software Many of these facilities/common tools are linked to equipment and projects taking place in the CERN beams but several are also distributed (for example irradiation facilities, electronics, software, etc)

8. S.Stapnes8 Outline of proposal The following key activities are identified. They will in several cases need to be split into several work-packages (will wait for call to be launched to finalise this breakdown). Current ongoing work is to identify main objectives, coordinators, main partners, budget envelopes  Electronics tools for new detectors (example 1)  Software developments for detector R&D: –Geant4 (pileup and also other packages), Fluka (backgrounds), Reconstruction toolkit, Geometry package to allow simulating various layouts efficiently)  Irradiation facilities for detector R&D – crucial in particular for SLHC rates, several such facilities around Europe needed – many improvements needed for SLHC studies (and will obviously also cover needs for anybody else)  Test-beam facilities: –Linear Collider Combined tests (example 2) –SLHC detector testing –Neutrino Detector Testing –Super B Detector Testing  Technical Coordination tools for Linear Collider Experiment(s)  Technical Coordination tools for Neutrino Experiment(s) In addition there will be a Management/Outreach WP

9. S.Stapnes9 Outline of proposal - example 1 Deep Sub-Micron (DSM) electronics  Main clients SLHC, ILC/CLIC and super-B. Neutrino detectors will profit from the developments, though their need for radiation hardness is less  Proposed activities (being worked out) in table on the right: Activity presently initiated by Sandro Marchioro Contact persons:  ILC/CLIC – Christoph de la Taille, Marc Winter, Leif Jönssen, Luciano Musa  SLHC – Philippe Farthouat, Jordan Nash  Neutrinos – Alfons Weber, Andre Rubbia  B-physic – Valerio Re (Bergamo univ.) Silicon IC technologies:  CMOS 130, 90, 65 nm  SiGe on several CMOS platforms ??  Legacy technologies:.35 micron to ¼ micron  Dedicated high voltage technologies  Common MPW activities for selected processes Enabling tools:  CAE tools, on top of Europractice class tools  Modern system level simulation tools  Libraries and shareable IPs  Training and education  Test tools: IC tester Wafer prober (300 mm wafers will eventually be unavoidable)  Access to common irradiation facilities Shareable IP blocks:  Optimized and validated digital libraries  Generators for SEU robust memories  Timing generation blocks (DLLs, PLLs)  Analog blocks: Bandgap reference, AD and DA blocks Auxiliary technologies:  Standard and advanced bump- bonding  3D interconnect  Low cost standard (QFN, fpBGA, TSOP, etc)

10. S.Stapnes10 Outline of proposal - example 2 Linear Collider combined test facilities  Beamline adaption  Integration facility for parts  DAQ combined  Tracking infrastructure  Calorimeter prototype infrastrucutre Related (under the headings software and integration tool activities two pages back)  Energy flow reconstruction tools  Integration tool development (technical coordination)

11. S.Stapnes11 Meeting with National Contacts

12. S.Stapnes12 Similar proposals  HadronPhysics in FP6 I3HP has 49 beneficiaries and a 17.4 MEURO EU budget. –Current project is at http://www.infn.it/eu/i3hp/http://www.infn.it/eu/i3hp/ –They are preparing a follow-up proposal:http://www.hadronphysics2.eu/. We expect this proposal to request 15 MEURO from the EU.http://www.hadronphysics2.eu/  The EURONS community for nuclear physics. –The present EURONS project has 14.1 MEURO EU funds. EURONS has 9 NA's, 12 TA's and 13 JRA's: http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/pdf/eurons.pdfhttp://www.gsi.de/informationen/jofu/EUR ONS/ http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/pdf/eurons.pdfhttp://www.gsi.de/informationen/jofu/EUR ONS/ –They are preparing a new proposal (link not found)  There is the ILIAS (Integrated Large Infrastructures for AstroparticleScience) FP6 project. –Current project got 7.5 MEURO from the EU: http://wwwilias.cea.fr/scripts/home/publigen/content/templates/show.asp?L=EN&P=293&vTicker=all eza&ITEMID=3 http://wwwilias.cea.fr/scripts/home/publigen/content/templates/show.asp?L=EN&P=293&vTicker=all eza&ITEMID=3 –They are preparing a new proposal under this site: http://www- ilias.cea.fr/scripts/home/publigen/content/templates/show.asp?P=157&L=EN&ITEMID=43http://www- ilias.cea.fr/scripts/home/publigen/content/templates/show.asp?P=157&L=EN&ITEMID=43

13. S.Stapnes13 Budget strategy  Aimed for 15 MEURO - in line with large size of community –And to make sure we can involve them in these important general facilities that are clearly needed for next phase  Some uneasiness that we enter with two large proposals - accelerators and detectors  What do we do - reducing the detector proposal will drive down the number of participants and funding shares, and hence the attractiveness of proposal both for participants (= some of you) and to the EU. Below a certain limit it makes no sense.  We need to have an agreed common strategy

14. S.Stapnes14 Conclusions  Progress is being made outlining an IA – following the plans outlined in our London/Manchester/Berlin meetings –Now have people working on each activity including contacts to main detector development projects in these areas –Coordination and National Contact Groups established –Proposal is concentrated on key facilities for Detector R&D in Europe that we serve a large part of the community and that can be used by several projects  Budget envelope very difficult and impacts the number of groups and projects that can be included

15. S.Stapnes15 More slides

16. S.Stapnes16 Motivation for coordination  ATLAS and CMS have 10-20 active R&D areas each for SLHC upgrade - involving many groups across Europe and outside EUDET have ongoing EU project (FP6-I3) hosted by DESY - ends by end 2009. In the neutrino area and flavour area specific detector R&D is foreseen or ongoing. CERN has R&D activities in white paper, overlapping partly with (and participating in) the activities above. Unless coordinated there will be a (large?) number of competing IA proposals from our community Furthermore, there is clear need to improve contact between R&D groups in these areas and also use European infrastructures for these R&D activities are efficiently as possible (testbeams, irradiation facilities, integration areas, facilities with magnets or cryogenic infrastructures, etc) Note: ESGARD have already decided to collect accelerator R&D in all the areas above (and CLIC) into one single IA application.

17. S.Stapnes17 FP7-Planning of calls and indicative budget Total operational budget 1665 M€ Call 1 2007 Call 2 2007 Call 3 2008 Call 4 2008 Call 5 2009 Call 6 2010 Call 7 2012 Integrating activities 277xx e-Infrastructures4250113xx Design studies31x Construction – Support to the Preparatory Phase 147 x Construction – Support to the Implementation Phase RSFF (200 M€) + 130 M€ Policy Development and Programme Implementation 8145xxx Total per call (M€)22864282113 R.Aleksans talk in ESGARD workshop

18. S.Stapnes18

19. S.Stapnes19 EUDET/DESY (J.Mnich) EUDET runs until end 2009, nevertheless make plans for this IA call (DS maybe would have been preferred but timing wrong) Directions of interest for FP7:  Hadron test beam  ILC like testbeam timing structure (particle type not so important)  DAQ  Electronics (DSM)  Resources expected to be similar to EUDET  Meeting in Paris 8-9.10

20. S.Stapnes20 ATLAS (N.Hessey) Activities (22 R&Ds ongoing – each with 5-10 groups):  Several Inner Detector proposals (sensors, FE elec, modules, cooling, powering, etc)  LAr high rate  Muon high rate  Forward areas Infrastructures:  Project Office – to document as built (technical coordination)  GIF (muon irradiation facility)  Testbeams w/magnet + irradiation  Clean room plus bonding facilities, assembly areas –Cooling plants Resources not given (but can be estimated for each R&D part). Both for ATLAS and CMS upgrade workshops typically draw 100 150 – mostly active – participants

21. S.Stapnes21 CMS (J.Nash) R&D activities:  ID parts similar to ATLAS  Powering  Radiation studies/simulation  Track stub at lvl1 (lvl1 track trigger)  Machine interface  Muons and calos less critical to change than for ATLAS Resources – R&D, 20% of CORE estimate for upgrade (would be 30 MCHf) Infrastructures:Testbeams and irradiations, cleanroom

22. S.Stapnes22 Neutrinos (NEUdet – A.Blondel) Detectors (costing similar to LHC experiments) – 2012-2021 (500 people) JRA Work packages  Test beam infrastructure (Radicioni)  Photon detectors (near and far detectors) (Soler, Cervera)  Cryogenic (liquid argon) detector studies (Rubbia)  Silicon detectors for near detectors (Soler)  Very large magnet development (NN) Networking activities: (Cervera) (two NA, management, and:)  putting it all together, co-ordintation of test beam, web master, etc..  common simulation and performance and cost evaluation framework work towards forming a community consensus  conception of hybrid detectors and combined test beam measurements  link to industrial partners and other fields using similar detectors (LHC/LC) Transnational access (one)  access to test beam facilities

23. S.Stapnes23 Flavour (F.Forti) Several areas similar to ILC, but timing structure (luminosity) a challenge Areas:  Thin silicon  Photo detection for PID  Crystals for calorimeters (LSO for example)  Large area muon …  System aspects of large silicon systems Infrastructures:  Beam structure, 4ns continuous  Testbeams at CERN and Frascati Interested in participating in IA (either alone or together) …

24. S.Stapnes24 CERN (L.Linssen) Resources estimate given based on R&D included in white paper … covering 2008- 2011 Focus on common developments:  Radiation hard electronics and Common Building Block  On detector power management  Rad. hard optical links for experiments  RD50 - silicon  RD51 – micropattern (mentioned detector simulation tool – GARFIELD)  Interconnection (hybridisation)  Facilities and Components analysis for detector R&D –GIF+PS+component analysis for gas systems  Exploit multicore processes for simulation …  Virtual technologies Must avoid too large overlap with SLHC-PP Infrastructures:  Testbeams, irradiation facilities + GIF, cleanrooms, microelectronics, gas supply with gas analysis