Download presentation
Published byAbigayle Gilbert Modified over 9 years ago
1
Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination Source: Contemporary Educational Psychology (2008) 915–931 Authors: Robert M. Klassen, Lindsey L. Krawchuk, Sukaina Rajani Speaker: Cheng-Yee Lee
2
Introduction Not a e-learning paper Procrastination
But can be applied to e-learning Procrastination The intentional delay of an intended course of action, in spite of an awareness of negative outcomes Neural or negative effect Most are neagative
3
Introduction Known research Self-efficacy Self-esteem procrastination
Self-regulation procrastination
4
Introduction Self-efficacy for self-regulation? Two studies
No related research Two studies Study1 Study2 Various factor procrastination Neural procrastinator Negative procrastinator Various factor Various factor
5
Academic self-efficacy
Study 1 Self-regulation Academic self-efficacy Self-esteem Procrastination Self-efficacy For Self-regulation GPA
6
Study 1 Participant 261 undergraduate students Question survey
90% female Age 18-53, mean 23.33 All are volunteers, without any reward credit Question survey
7
Academic self-efficacy
Study 1 Variable measurement Self-regulation MSLQ (1993) Academic self-efficacy MSLQ (1993) Self-esteem Procrastination Rosenberg. (1979) Tuckman (1992) Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Zimmerman et al. (1992) GPA Self-reported 4-scales
8
Study 1 Result Reliability
9
Study 1 Result Correlation matrix
10
Study 1 Result hierarchical regression analysis
11
Study 2 Neural Procrastinator Negative Procrastinator GPA GPA
Daily procrastination Daily procrastination Task procrastination Task procrastination Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Predicted grade Predicted grade Actual grade Actual grade
12
Study 2 Participant 195 volunteers
72% female 19-40 years (mean 23.20) Distribute survey in the first few weeks of semester And collect their grade at the end of semester
13
Daily procrastination
Study 2 Variable measurement Neural Procrastinator Negative Procrastinator how much does procrastination negatively influence your academic functioning? 4-scales GPA Self-reported 4-scales Daily procrastination How much time do you procrastinate on schoolwork during a typical day Task procrastination Days before due/Days given for completion of previous task Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Zimmerman et al. (1992) Predicted grade Self-reported 4-scales Actual grade From instructor
14
Study 2 Result
15
Study 2 Result
16
Study 2 Result
17
Study 2 Result
18
Conclusion High self-regulation does not mean low procrastination
Self-efficacy for self-regulation is more suitable for predict procrastination
19
Comment A typical survey research We can apply SDT theory
GPA factors in study 2 is a little redundant We can apply SDT theory Study for internal motivation should have better self-efficacy for self-regulation We can survey similar factors in e-learning environment In study 2, task procrastination can be measured by days before due/days given for viewing full chapter
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.