Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination Source: Contemporary Educational.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination Source: Contemporary Educational."— Presentation transcript:

1 Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination Source: Contemporary Educational Psychology (2008) 915–931 Authors: Robert M. Klassen, Lindsey L. Krawchuk, Sukaina Rajani Speaker: Cheng-Yee Lee

2 Introduction Not a e-learning paper Procrastination
But can be applied to e-learning Procrastination The intentional delay of an intended course of action, in spite of an awareness of negative outcomes Neural or negative effect Most are neagative

3 Introduction Known research Self-efficacy Self-esteem procrastination
Self-regulation procrastination

4 Introduction Self-efficacy for self-regulation? Two studies
No related research Two studies Study1 Study2 Various factor procrastination Neural procrastinator Negative procrastinator Various factor Various factor

5 Academic self-efficacy
Study 1 Self-regulation Academic self-efficacy Self-esteem Procrastination Self-efficacy For Self-regulation GPA

6 Study 1 Participant 261 undergraduate students Question survey
90% female Age 18-53, mean 23.33 All are volunteers, without any reward credit Question survey

7 Academic self-efficacy
Study 1 Variable measurement Self-regulation MSLQ (1993) Academic self-efficacy MSLQ (1993) Self-esteem Procrastination Rosenberg. (1979) Tuckman (1992) Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Zimmerman et al. (1992) GPA Self-reported 4-scales

8 Study 1 Result Reliability

9 Study 1 Result Correlation matrix

10 Study 1 Result hierarchical regression analysis

11 Study 2 Neural Procrastinator Negative Procrastinator GPA GPA
Daily procrastination Daily procrastination Task procrastination Task procrastination Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Predicted grade Predicted grade Actual grade Actual grade

12 Study 2 Participant 195 volunteers
72% female 19-40 years (mean 23.20) Distribute survey in the first few weeks of semester And collect their grade at the end of semester

13 Daily procrastination
Study 2 Variable measurement Neural Procrastinator Negative Procrastinator how much does procrastination negatively influence your academic functioning? 4-scales GPA Self-reported 4-scales Daily procrastination How much time do you procrastinate on schoolwork during a typical day Task procrastination Days before due/Days given for completion of previous task Self-efficacy For Self-regulation Zimmerman et al. (1992) Predicted grade Self-reported 4-scales Actual grade From instructor

14 Study 2 Result

15 Study 2 Result

16 Study 2 Result

17 Study 2 Result

18 Conclusion High self-regulation does not mean low procrastination
Self-efficacy for self-regulation is more suitable for predict procrastination

19 Comment A typical survey research We can apply SDT theory
GPA factors in study 2 is a little redundant We can apply SDT theory Study for internal motivation should have better self-efficacy for self-regulation We can survey similar factors in e-learning environment In study 2, task procrastination can be measured by days before due/days given for viewing full chapter


Download ppt "Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination Source: Contemporary Educational."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google