1. Demographic Destiny: Higher Education Enrollment Trends Don Hossler Professor of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Indiana University Bloomington

2. An Exemplar Demographic and Enrollment Trends –The Nation –New York Public Policy Trends –Federal Trends –State Trends Implications for the Private Sector –Policy Implications –Enrollment Management Implications

3. The Beginning of the Pipeline

4. High School Graduates 11% Growth Source: U.S. Department of Education 28% Growth

5. Minority School Enrollments 36% to 50% 21% to 35% 10% to 20% More than 50% Less than 10% Source: U.S. Department of Education

6. Enrollment Patterns Among Four-Year Institutions 70.5% 70.7% 68.9%

8. A Summative Look at Market Share Across All Sectors Source: U. S. Department of Education

9. Switching to a State View

10. The Next Generation

11. The High School Pipeline – One View

12. But What’s Under the Hood? A Look at Ethnicity of Graduates

13. And Where Will They Come From?

14. These Last Slides Present a Probable Profile of…. Students of color Lower income students Who are more likely to be price sensitive Who will be within easy commuting distance of community colleges

15. A Look at Enrollment Patterns by Sector

16. It Appears the Private Sector is Doing Well

17. A Look Across All Sectors

18. An Interesting Look at the Public Sector

19. But, Where Do Transfers Go?

20. Now, What About Public Policy Shifts?

21. Federal Policy Trends Focus on transferability –From traditionally accredited 2 yr IHES –From proprietary schools Ways to constrain demands for financial aid Current federal policies being proposed could have a chilling impact on most public and private 4 years and at least indirectly advantage two year sector

22. Relevant State Policy Trends at the National Level Constrain demands for state resources going to postsecondary education –Appropriations to institutions –Support for student financial aid Seamless transferability –Encourage transfer & articulation agreements –Mandate them All of these are likely to increase the social acceptability of starting at Two-Year Colleges

23. New York State Policy Trends Little focus on seamless transferability – at least for now Looking for ways to constrain state appropriations for higher education This could result in higher tuition in the public sector and this would help privates State University of New York Board– What are the incentive structures for them around their institutions?

24. Thoughts and Implications Private sector has done well Demographic shifts pose potential problems – they have more in common characteristics of students attending 2 year colleges Students starting in 2 year colleges already have a preference for publics Public policy trends could result in longer term student preference shifts toward community colleges which could result in more students at publics Will SUNY incentivize transferring within public sector institutions?

25. Public an private, two-years and four-years should monitor these trends It is axiomatic, institutions that are less wealthy and selective should be more concerned