1. LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE

2. The cornerstone of this debate style is the productive dialogue between two differing moral interpretations (value propositions) of an important issue.
Each debater presents a case in which the thesis/resolution is interpreted fairly.
The complexities of an issue are acknowledged through the acceptance of some harms and risks on both sides.
A good debater should be able to argue against unfair definitions of terms, or the imbalanced assignment of burdens.
In other words, debaters should present a persuasive moral position that they can defend against criticisms, refutation without falling into fallacies, contradiction, or denying the complexity of issues at stake.

3. Lincoln-Douglas Debate Rules
One debater argues the affirmative side, the other debater argues the negative side.
The affirmative speaker must present a position agreeing with the proposition or resolution.
The negative debater must disagree with the resolution and provide sufficient clash.
Each debater should be able to make a positive case for their position and values, as opposed to a purely negative attack of his/her opponent.

4. Lincoln-Douglas Debate Format
1st Affirmative Constructive (3-4 minutes)
Clearly state the resolution/proposition
Clearly preview your main points/contentions
Clearly support each point with credible evidence and use good reasoning
Conclude by summarizing main points
Cross Examination of the affirmative by the negative (2 minutes)
Negative asks questions
Have a strategy and direction to your questioning
Put the affirmative on the defensive!

5. Debate Format, Continued
1st Negative Constructive (3-4 minutes)
Clearly state your stance on the resolution
Clearly preview your main points/contentions
Clearly support each point with credible evidence and use good reasoning
Cross Examination of the negative by the affirmative (2 minutes)
Affirmative asks questions
Have a strategy and direction to your questioning
Put the negative on the defensive!

6. Rebuttals Each side has one minute for the final rebuttal.
No new arguments or evidence are allowed in the final rebuttals.
The affirmative should convince the audience of the need for change and show the burden of proof.
The negative should convince the audience that the affirmative has failed to carry out the burden of proof and defend the status quo.

7. Rebuttals, Continued
Rebuttals may consist of elaboration of points already mentioned, or of points newly introduced.
For example, arguments whose logic and examples are distinct from the points that preceded them.
However, concerns of fairness demand that no new points should be brought up after the first affirmative rebuttal.
If a point is not defended from an attack in any given speech, it cannot be defended for the first time in consecutive speeches.

8. Rebuttals, Continued
In each rebuttal, the speaker must defend his/her own case from previous attacks made by the opponent.
Each debater must also attack the opponent’s specific case.
An argument left untouched or unquestioned by the opponent does not necessarily mean that the debater has agreed with that point.
However, a failure to address all points is important in the “dropped” points cannot be defended later in the debate.

9. Class Exercise Putting barriers on the Golden Gate Bridge
Making laws against panhandling
Affirmative advocates a position
Negative defends the status quo