Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDayna Parrish Modified over 9 years ago
1
case series of wide diameter (6 mm) implants immediately loaded with posterior single restorations A Immediate loading of implants replacing single molars are of high interest as first and second molars are the most commonly missing teeth in posterior jaw. Wide platform (WP) implants offer greater surface area for osseointegration and are more capable of handling higher occlusive forces in the posterior regions of jaw compared to regular diameter implants. Few studies have evaluated 6 mm wide diameter implants for posterior single tooth restorations. AIM The present study aimed at evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes of wide diameter (6 mm) implants used for cement-retained prosthetic restorations of single molars in immediate function. Forty eight consecutive patients were treated between April 2007 and October 2010. All patients included in the study underwent a complete preoperative evaluation comprising a detailed medical history, clinical, and radiographic examinations. SURGICAL PROTOCOL A total of 53 NobelSpeedy WP 6 mm implants were placed. A flapless implant surgery was performed on twenty on patients and for the remaining patients, a flap surgery. PROSTHETIC PROTOCOL All provisionals were cement-retained acrylic crowns delivered immediately after surgery (within 48 hours of implant placement). Measures were taken to minimize the intraoral intervention time and to keep the surgical site clean. CLINICAL & RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENTS Patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a minimum of 1 year and up to 3 years. Patients were assessed radiographically for bone level measurements and clinically for occlusion, papilla volume (papilla index), and bleeding on probing (BOP) at the time of implant placement surgery (baseline) and at each follow-up visit, when visual signs of inflammation was also assessed. The mesial and distal marginal bone level change over time was assessed by comparing intra-oral radiographs taken at implant insertion and those up to 3 years later. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. MATERIAL AND METHODS INTRODUCTION RESULTS H. Antoun, P. Cherfane, B. Sojod (Paris, France) CONCLUSION This prospective study demonstrates a good predictability for wide diameter (6 mm) implants when used to replace of single molars. Its use is associated with good outcomes in terms of implant survival, marginal bone changes and soft tissue health at the end of one year. It also confirms effectiveness of use of immediate loading protocol in terms of good 1-year implant stability. A longer follow up study is necessary to evaluate the long term success of this technique. Contact: www.ificia.fr Table 1 Cumulative Survival Rate (CSR) for Implants Time PeriodImplantsFailedWithdrawnCSR % Placement - 4 weeks5300100.0 4 weeks - 6 months531198.1 6 months - 1 year510098.1 Table 2 Bleeding on Probing and Inflammation at 12 Months Bleeding on probingSigns of inflammation Number of implant sites% % Yes24.424.3 No4395.64595.7 Total4510047100 Table 3: Marginal Bone Remodeling at All Sites Implant insertion to 3 month Implant insertion to 6 month Implant insertion to 12 month 3 month to 6 month 6 month to 12 month Mean (mm)-0.20-0.45-0.17-0.01-0.19 SD (mm)1.570.661.840.390.69 N3830342625 FrequencyN%N%N%N%N% > 312.600.025.900.00 2.1 - 3.012.600.00 0 14.0 1.1 - 2.00013.325.913.800.0 0.1 - 1.037.913.338.8830.8832.0 0513.2413.312.9415.414.0 -1 - -0.12565.82170.01955.91350.01352.0 -2 - -1.125.326.7720.600.028.0 -3 - -2.100.013.300.00 0 -4 - -3.112.600.00 0 0 Total3810030100331002610024100 At the end of 1 year, cumulative survival rate was 98.1% (table 1), and there were no mechanical or biological complications (table 2). The mean marginal bone remodeling was -0.17 ± 1.84 mm. Marginal bone level changes with distribution frequencies for all sites are presented in table 3. Occlusal view of the Snappy abutment directly after implant placement (Nobel Speedy 6x13) using the flapless technique A temporary light-cured composite resin crown (Protemp) was adjusted in mouth and tightly adapted A prefabricated cap was peformed over the sappy abutment resin was used to achieve properly sealed margins between the cap and the provisional crown and to establish a proper emergence profile. The provisional crown was meticulously polished and perforated to evacuate excess cement Vestibular view at final prosthesis insertion Vestibular view at 3 years follow-up Occlusal view of the povisional crown X-ray at implant insertion X-ray at 3 years follow-up X-ray at 1 year follow-up X-ray at 2 years follow-up This work was supported by a Nobel Biocare grant number 2006-485. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Giovanni GF, Chiara CS, Scotti R. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 474-480. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System(R) Wide Platform TiUnite implants: a 5-year follow-up report of a prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 311-318. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Wide-diameter implants: analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 52-58.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.