1. EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND 2014-2020 INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012

2. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY?  Present the Government’s latest thinking for an EU Common Strategic Framework (CSF) Funds delivery model and get feedback from you to inform its further development  To listen to your views  Understand from you your plans and aspirations for how to use the CSF Funds

3. WHAT’S HAPPENED SO FAR……  Informal consultation (April 2012)  Bespoke events for specific audiences eg. universities, local authorities, voluntary sector, fund specific management committees, etc (Spring-Autumn 2012)  Development of an initial delivery model and Ministerial discussion (November 2012)  Road testing the approach (today!)  Refining the model for formal consultation 2013

4. WHAT YOU HAVE TOLD US SO FAR  Preference for place based programmes with flexible geographies  Any approach must be responsive to local need and national priorities  Simplification of fund management  Integrated programming, in particular in relation to the Structural Funds (ERDF and ESF)  Better co-ordination of match-funding & co-financing across the public sector

5. INITIAL CSF MODEL: DELIVERY ARRANGEMENTS Projects Community Led Local Development, including Leader and FLAGs Maritime and Fisheries Programme (EMFF) Rural Development Programme (EAFRD) Growth Programme (ERDF, ESF & EAFRD) CSF Growth Teams Co-financing Organisations LEPs / ITIs

6. GROWTH PROGRAMME ORGANISING PRINCIPLES National and local priorities aligned Variable geographies Local decision making and drive Complex EU funds packaged as a coherent and consistent programme Common standards and transparent accountabilities Lower cost & simplifies administration A single set of targets and milestones across England EU regulatory requirements met and financial risk minimised BETTER FOCUS HIGHER IMPACT INCREASED GROWTH

7. GROWTH PROGRAMME  An “EU Growth Programme” to be financed by ERDF and ESF with a contribution from EAFRD  A single “EU Growth Programme Board” incorporating a joint Programme Managing Committee for ESF and ERDF  LEPs to be the fundamental building blocks receiving a 7 year notional allocation subject to periodic performance reviews  LEPs to identify their preferred EU investment strategy as part of their wider strategy for agreement by the Growth Board. LEPs to select projects and oversee delivery against their strategy  Government departmental teams to work as “CSF Area Growth Teams” to support LEPs in the development and delivery of projects and oversee management of the funds  National co-financing initiatives to take account of local needs.  ‘ITIs’ may be an option in a limited number of places - where this arrangement will deliver better value, higher impact results.

8. GROWTH PROGRAMME THEMES Innovation SME competitiveness Low carbon economy Skills

9.  Greater alignment of eligibility rules for projects across the country  Improved and harmonised guidance to applicants  Managing authority to ‘hide the wiring’ where projects draw on more than one fund GROWTH PROGRAMME: A SIMPLIFIED SYSTEM

10. RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME  Securing environmental benefits  Boosting the competitiveness and growth of agriculture and forestry sector  Strengthening rural communities

11. MARITIME AND FISHERIES PROGRAMME  Assisting fisheries to become more sustainable  Enhancing the competitiveness of the fisheries sector

12. EU PRIORITIES  Europe 2020: smart, sustainable and inclusive growth  National Reform Programme  Continue to improve the employability of young people, in particular those not in education, employment or training  Step up measures to facilitate the labour market integration of people from jobless households.  Further improve the availability of bank and non-bank financing to the private sector, in particular to SMEs.  Common Strategic Framework  better alignment of the CSF Fund investments to improve coherence and impact of investments.  improve the coordination of CSF Funds administration to increase efficiency and effectiveness.  Thematic Concentration  The percentage of ERDF that has to be directed on innovation, SMEs, low carbon and potentially ICT (currently 80% proposed)  The amount of ESF dedicated to social inclusion (currently 20% proposed).  Commission position paper for the UK

13. EU Commission tests & launches proposals Back to Member States / Commission Ministers agree domestic delivery IDEAS INTO REALITY : CSF NEGOTIATIONS PROCESS Agree- ment & go live European Parliament negotiations Informal consultation Develop UK EU budget negotiating positions Develop UK CSF negotiating positions UK negotiates EU budget UK negotiates with Commission & other EU countries Develop programmes EU - Eurozone crisis; downward pressure on EU budget; upward pressure on CSF funds to deliver results UK – pressure to drive high impact growth; localism; city deals; CSR; ministerial change & elections Formal consultation Identify, develop and test policy options

14. WHAT DO YOU THINK?!

15. Questions to Consider Local Priorities What are the four big things that would transform the economic and social situation of your area? Who do you need to collaborate with to achieve this? Other LEPs? Other organisations? What resources do you have to bring to the table? 2. Process/ Implementation How will the proposed delivery mechanism help you deliver your objectives? Are there practical constraints in making this model work? If so, what can we do to overcome this? How can we help your LEPs to be in a position to engage in the process?