Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrederica Flynn Modified over 9 years ago
1
Magnetic moments of baryon resonances Teilprojekt A3 Volker Metag II. Physikalisches Institut Universität Giessen Germany SFB/TR16 Mitgliederversammlung Bommerholz, 28.11.2006 SFB/TR16 the + (1232) resonance: summary and outlook the S 11 (1535) resonance motivation strangeness production in p + K 0*
2
structure calculations S 11 (1535) SU(3)5.582.79 Lattice QCD ( Cloet et al., PLB 563 (2003) ) 4.99(56)2.49(27) QSM ( Yang et al., PRD 70 (2004) ) 5.392.66 experimental values Castro et al., PLB 517 (2001) 339 6.14 0.51 M.Kotulla. et al., PRL 89, 272001 (2002) 2.7 2.2 3 PDG20043.7 - 7.5 2.7 2.2 3 — Magnetic moments of hadrons provided testing ground for the constituent quark model and baryon structure calculations SU(3) prediction: almost nothing is known about the magnetic moments of excited baryons
3
extrapolation: lattice data (quenched): Leinweber (1992) Cloet,Leinweber,Thomas (2003) Lee et.al. (2004) chiral calculations to NLO in δ expansion V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen PRL 94 102003 (2005) for m π < (M Δ – M N ) : Δ decays imaginary part is model independent prediction in chiral EFT framework Lattice calculation and chiral extrapolation ++ ++
4
1232 E / MeV 938 ´ proton M1,(E2), M3 ´ transition M1 sensitive to p p ´ ' ' dE d ER Magnetic moment of the + (1232) resonance V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen PRL 94 102003 (2005) EFT systematic annsatz (NLO) no Born terms !!
5
Pioneering experiment: improvements: higher statistics exploit sensitivity to polarisation observables linear and circular photon beam polarisation: , circ improved theoretical description TAPS @ MAMI 1999TAPS @ MAMI 1999 TAPS @ MAMI 1999TAPS @ MAMI 1999 TAPS@MAMITAPS@MAMI: + = (2.7±2.2±3) N M. Kotulla et al., PRL 89 (2002) 272 001 TAPS @ MAMI 1999
6
TAPS forward wall 384 BaF 2 – modules distance: 150 cm angles: 1.1 0 – 20.0 0 Crystal Ball 672 NaI - modules CB/TAPS@MAMI -beam LH 2 CB (inside 2MWPCs, PID) TAPS beam
7
Identification of p p 0 ` channel S. Schumann (Mainz) eliminating background from p p 0 0
8
beam asymmetry: discrepancy between data and calculation !! inclusion of Born terms will reduce discrepancy (M. Vanderhaegen, priv. com.)
9
follow up experiment with higher polarization needed !! real polarisation randomized polarisation S. Schumann (Mainz) circular polarisation circ Re =5 Re =3 Re =1 Re =0
10
energy distribution of ` S. Schumann (Mainz) B. Boillat (Basel) M. Kotulla et al., PRL89 (2002) 272 001 improvement in statistics !!
11
angular distribution of ` S. Schuman (Mainz) B. Boillat (Basel) M. Kotulla et al., PRL89 (2002) 272 001 improvement in statistics !!
12
present data (preliminary) M. Kotulla et al. Comparison of present data to pioneering experiment current theoretical calculation does not reproduce reproduce spectral distribution! improved theoretical calculations needed to extract ( + ) !!!!
13
Chiang et al., NPA 721 (2003) 731 unpol. LH 2 target: S 11 + (1535): p p ´ reaction calculation: effective Lagrangian model total cross section: 10nb Observables cross sections helicity asymmetry circ expected sensitivity: assuming 3200 counts (stat error) assuming 5% systematic error for m=1.8m N from energy differential cross section: magnetic moment of S 11 (1535) resonance
14
1/2 γ p Σ + (1189) K *0 K 0 s π 0 π 0 π 0 p π 0 1/3 E γ > 1840 MeV p π o 1/2 1/3 γ p Σ + (1189) K 0 π 0 K 0 s π 0 π 0 E γ > 1300 MeV reactions with p 4 π 0 final state γ p p π 0 η 3π 0 1/3 E γ > 930 MeV reactions with strangeness production to study baryon resonances through the measurement of poorly known meson-nucleon and meson-hyperon decay channels to study the coupling of vector meson-nucleon channels to kaon- hyperon states M. Nanova
15
theoretical predictions dynamical model for the cross section predictions M. Doering et al., PRC 73, 045209 (2006) Δ * (1700)→ ηΔΔ * (1700)→KΣ *
16
M. Doering et al., nucl-th/ 0510015 theoretical predictions E GeVE GeVE GeV cosθ
17
Q. Zhao et al., PRC 64,052201 (2001) K* 0 Σ+Σ+ K0K0 p γ theoretical predictions quark model predictions for the K* 0 and K* + photoproductions significant t-channel kaon exchange
18
kinematic fit: p p 4 0
19
p + (1189) K 0 * p 0 K 0 0 p 4 0 E = 2000-2150 MeV + (1189) K 0 * (892) K s 0 (498)
20
angular distributions
21
Summary and outlook strangeness production: p + (1189) K 0 * p 4 0 final analysis ongoing; paper in preparation magnetic dipole moments: pioneering experiment ongoing data analysis of improved follow up experiment: higher statistics polarization observables , circ improved calculation needed to exctract ( + ) next step: magnetic moment of S 11 (1535) via p p ‘ sensitivity to ( + )
22
Circular beam pol.: 580h @ 883 MeV 100h @ 550 MeV circular polarisation
23
Summary and Outlook magnetic dipole moments: valuable constaints for Baryon structure calculations past: experiments successful pioneering experiment for in progress: analysis of dedicated experiment Crystal Ball / TAPS @ MAMI cross sections, beam/helicity asymmetry coherent program (tests - reaction calculation) very large sensitivity to MDM future: generalization to other resonances S 11 (1535)
25
Recent calculation: EFT to calculate p ‘p systematic ansatz (NLO) includes rescattering MDM acquires real and imaginary part no Born terms
26
based on effective Lagrangian description: Born terms, t-channel exchange, rescattering included, gauge invariant describes simultanously W.-T. Chiang, M. Vanderhaeghen, S. N. Yang, D. Drechsel, hep-ph/0409078 Reaction model calculation
27
MAMI 1999-2000 100cm beam TAPS @ MAMI 1999 6 62, 1 138 detectors with individual veto detector, solid angle: ~0.40 4 sr
28
TAPS @ MAMI 1999
29
Hadron Structure: + Magnetic Moment magnetic moments: well known SU(3) octet baryons ( 10 -10 s), measured with spin precession techniques almost unknown for excited states (except (1232) ) a test for baryon structure calculations (wavefunction): e.g. SU(3): structure calculations S 11 (1535) SU(3)5.582.79 Lattice QCD ( Cloet et al., PLB 563 (2003) ) 4.99(56)2.49(27) QSM ( Yang et al., PRD 70 (2004) ) 5.392.66 experimental values Castro et al., PLB 517 (2001) 339 6.14 0.51 M.Kotulla. et al., PRL 89, 272001 (2002) 2.7 2.2 3 PDG20043.7 - 7.5 2.7 2.2 3 — what are the effective degrees of freedom? M1
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.