1. Actel RTAX-S FPGA Reliability Summary Kangsen Huey, HiRel Program Manager Ravi Pragasam, Senior Marketing Manager

2. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 2 Agenda : RTAX-S  Introduction  Qualification  MIL-PRF-38535, Class Q  Actel Antifuse Reliability Studies  EAQ ( Enhanced Antifuse Qualification)  HSB (High Single S, Single B) Design  New Processes and Procedures  ELA : Enhanced Lot Acceptance  XSEM : Die Cross Sections at Antifuse  Reliability Data and FIT Rate  Summary  Actel Flash Product Roadmap

3. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 3 RTAX-S Product Lineup  Introduced in 2004 and QML class Q level Qualified in 2005  Wafers fabricated on 0.15 µm process at United Microelectronics Corp (UMC), Taiwan Releasing in 2007

4. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 4 RTAX-S New Technology Features  First Antifuse FPGA that offers up to 4 Million system gates with enhanced features:  Embedded RAM blocks  Extensive I/O standard support  Hardened charge pump, clock trees, Power On Reset circuit  TMR Flip Flops  RTAX-S Antifuse Technology  Implemented with 0.15 μm CMOS process with new circuits designed to improve programming current and reduce net loading  Antifuse is similar in structure, but thinner than RTSX-SU generation due to the lower programming voltage  Results in less distance for material transport of the plate material during programming, resulting in better I PEAK tolerance for net loading  Single S-Antifuses get 67% less I PEAK stress during switching compared to RTSX-SU  Designer software has SAL (S- Antifuse Loading) to dramatically reduce Single S-Antifuse count  Single B-Antifuses have 50% less I PEAK vs. RTSX-SU  Architecture includes adding buffers to reduce net loading on long nets  Programming Current  B, I, S, K antifuses have 10% to 20% more programming current

5. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 5 RTAX-S QML Qualification with Enhanced Testing for Antifuse RTAX-S QUALIFICATION MIL-PRF-38535, Class Q Qualification Actel Antifuse Reliability Studies (Enhanced Antifuse Qualification + HSB) &

6. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 6 RTAX-S Qualification (1/3)  MIL-PRF-38535, Class Q Level Compliant Qualification  Qualification Burn In (QBI) Design was developed for qualification life test  Tests the overall CMOS and Antifuse technology  Maximizes resources utilization like the Flip Flops, IOs, SRAM, FIFO, Carry chains, etc.  Functional test vector developed to for 3-temp FT  Uses fully class Q level screened devices  Group C test  87 RTAX2000S and 98 RTAX1000S devices passed 1,000 hours of group C at 125 o C  Pass/Fail criteria tightened to LTPD(3) equivalent of 129(1) of the largest RTAX2000S devices  Assuming every 2 RTAX1000S equals to one RTAX2000S  Added LTOL (Low Temp Operating Life) test  78 RTAX1000S devices passed 1,000 hours of LTOL at -55 o C  Group A, B, D, ESD, Latch-Up, IO Capacitance also performed  6 parts (2 RTAX2000S and 4 RTAX1000S) in Group C and 1 part in LTOL failed due to equipment failures  FA reports available upon request

7. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 7 RTAX-S Qualification (2/3)  EAQ (Enhanced Antifuse Qualification)  Objective is to uncover antifuse failure modes and determine antifuse failure rate  Uses highly perceptive and stressful designs for antifuse evaluation  Similar to the antifuse studies employed for RTSX-SU  The EAQ design is capable to detect small (pico to nano seconds) shifts in net propagation delay, which can be detected through analyzing the delta delays  High and Low Temperature Operating Life tests (HTOL/LTOL) performed with RTAX1000S-CG624 devices  291 units passed 1,000 hours of HTOL at +125 o C and 250 hours of LTOL at -55 o C  One unit had CMOS process related failure (non-antifuse related) after 500 hours of HTOL  6 units failed due to equipment (BIB data contention)  Devices did not go through the Burn-In screening required for QML class Q level devices  120 units carried on and all passed 6,000 hours of HTOL with No failures

8. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 8 RTAX-S Qualification (3/3)  High single S-Antifuse and high single B- Antifuse (HSB) utilization design  Testing was conducted after the completion of QML qualification activity  HSB design maximized the utilization of both single S-Antifuse and single B-Antifuse  High and Low Temperature Operating Life tests (HTOL/LTOL) performed with RTAX1000S-CG624 devices  298 units passed 1,000 hours of HTOL at +125 o C and 250 hours of LTOL at -55 o C  Two units had CMOS failure due to electrical over-stress (non-antifuse related) at 250 hours pull point of HTOL  Devices did not go through the Burn-In screening required for QML class Q level devices

9. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 9 RTAX-S Qualification Designs  Design utilization for QBI, EAQ and HSB Reliability Testing  Qualification designs represent the worst case end-use condition  User designs have generally less utilization than the above qualification designs

10. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 10 Antifuse Usage Statistics  The EAQ and HSB designs were created to study specific Antifuse types like:  The Critical K-Antifuse  Single S-Antifuse  Single B-Antifuse  Number of critical antifuses utilized in the various RTAX1000S Reliability Test Vehicles  NO antifuse faults have been observed in RTAX1000S-CG624 reliability studies with these designs

11. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 11 RTAX-S Production Process Enhancement RTAXS Wafer specific XSEM Standard Quality Control Monitor Extended Lot Acceptance (ELA)Standard B, E Flow processing Actel Specific E-test Thermal Runaway Characterization XY Programming New Process StepsOld Process Steps

12. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 12 RTAX-S Processes and Procedures (1/2)  Standard Quality Control Monitor (QCM)  Programming & functional test using LTPD 30 (8 samples, 0 failures)  Design is identical to QBI (targeted for general CMOS/Antifuses)  Test is done per assembly build for the RTAX250S  Extended Lot Acceptance (ELA)  Test is done per wafer lot  168 hours of burn in at 125 ºC with stringent EAQ design  Sample size:  RTAX250S – 100 units  RTAX1000S – 24 units  RTAX2000S – 14 units  Wafer lot acceptance criteria allows Zero antifuse related failures  If any failures or outliers are detected, failure analysis is performed to determine root cause  XY Programming  Wafer number and die location on wafer is now programmed into each unit during wafer sort  Silicon Sculptor Programming SW revision also programmed into device at final design programming

13. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 13 RTAX-S Processes and Procedures (2/2)  Wafer-specific cross section inspection (XSEM)  Two samples per wafer are cross-sectioned at antifuses  XSEMs are inspected for anomalous antifuse construction  Wafers are scrapped if found to be beyond the specification  Susceptible wafers are required to be used as ELA samples  All the wafers that pass are built for shipments  Thermal Runaway Characterization  This test is required per wafer lot (starting with 2007 fab out lots)  2 sample units are programmed with ELA design and characterized at oven temperature of 125 o C, 130 o C, and 135 o C  Lots that exhibit thermal run-away phenomena are scrapped  Actel E-test  In addition to wafer foundry provided E-test data, Actel runs additional E-test after wafers arrive  Provides more in depth information on antifuse related parameters

14. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 14 RTAX-S Reliability FIT Rate  NO Antifuse faults have been observed to date in any of the reliability testing (QBI, EAQ, ELA, HSB) thus far  1.7 Million device hours have been accumulated to date  Refer http://www.actel.com/documents/RTAXS_Rel_Test_WP.pdf for details (updated as needed)http://www.actel.com/documents/RTAXS_Rel_Test_WP.pdf  Failure rate estimation: Device FIT = 11.7 @ Tj = 55 ºC  Using the chi-square distribution and a minimum upper confidence limit of 60% per JESD74  CMOS Activation Energy: Ea = 0.7 eV  Includes 1 CMOS process related failure  The remaining failures were identified as EOS or equipment related  FA reports available upon request

15. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 15 RTAX-S On-Going Quality and Reliability Improvement  Process Change Notification through GIDEP Problem Advisory  SC7-P-06-01 (PCN0608), Elimination of RTAX-S ICCA Current Increase Due to Heavy Ion-Induced Upset  SC7-P-06-02 (PCN0606), EDAC Macro modification to correct simultaneous reads and writes occur to a single address.  SC7-P-07-02 (PCN0625), to correct routed clock timing under- estimation  All issues were associated with software bugs and discovered through internal and customer failure analysis  Silicon has remained the same since qualification  On-Going Process Improvement After Qualification  X-Y Programming, Thermal Run-Away Analysis  High Frequency SET, High Temperature SEL, Prompt Dose  Completed ESD Testing

16. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 16 RTAX-S Reliability Summary  Actel has enhanced its Qualification Procedure to include both MIL-PRF-38535 QML-Q and Enhanced Antifuse Qualification (EAQ)  New processes have been implemented to ensure high quality and highly reliable RTAX-S product is shipped  NO antifuse failures detected with almost 1.7M device-hours of testing which showcases robustness of this technology  Parts have been baselined in many programs  Has started to develop QML class V level qualification/certification with the RTAX4000S qualification process

17. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 17 Planning to Fly RTAX-S MUOSAdvanced EHFNPOESSGalileo Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter James Webb Space Telescope Mars Science Lab Bepi Colombo GOES-R GAIA

18. © 2007 Actel Confidential and ProprietaryHuey/Pragasam January 2007New Technology Insertion Workshop 18 New Technology Plans: Space-Flight Flash FPGAs  Actel continues to develop new technology for Space applications such as Flash based FPGAs  Unique Flash advantages  Non-Volatile and Live at Power-Up  Reprogrammable  RTA3PE (130nm)  Based on the commercial Flash product line  Radiation projections – suitable for LEO / short duration payloads  Immune to SEL  TID to ~ 15 to 20 Krad, parametric and functional  To implement Soft TMR for protection against data SEUs  Flight units expected 2008 to 2009  Mil-Std-883 qualified  RT-G4 (90nm)  Project founded by DTRA  In architecture concept phase  Expect flight units 2010 to 2012  Target TID to 300 Krad  5M to 10M system gates

19. Thank You