Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAnastasia Morrison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Eric Jones Senior Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center 89 th AMS Meeting
2
July 2007 - Began development and implementation Used NWS OHD Research Distributed Hydrologic Model V2.0. SACSMA used for rainfall-runoff No snow model used Rating curve method of routing Initially used basins 3, expanded to 7 Calibrated before implemented Verification done on initial three basins Black Creek at Brooklyn, MS (BKN) Leaf River at Collins, MS (CLS) Emory River at Oakdale, TN (OAK)
3
BKN CLS OAK
4
++= Basin Model % bias Daily RMSE Corr Coef (CMSD) CLS Distrib0.2546.380.724 Lumped-14.1041.840.748 BKN Distrib9.4118.940.810 Lumped14.9715.290.791 OAK Distrib-1.2844.060.889 Lumped-15.8841.740.895
5
January 2008- October 2008 Simulated Lumped vs Distributed models Not adjusted to stage observations No runtime modifications included in lumped model Statistics on forecasts +24 hours Used quality controlled multi-sensor precipitation est. Mean average PE used for distributed model Mostly computed PE used for lumped model
6
BKN Distrib Lumped CLS Distrib Lumped OAK Distrib Lumped
7
BKN Distrib Lumped CLS Distrib Lumped OAK Distrib Lumped
8
BKN Dist Lump CLS OAK Dist Lump
9
One square = 4 km 2 Distrib Lumped Obs
10
Distrib Lumped Obs One square = 4 km 2
11
Distrib Lumped Obs One square = 4 km 2
12
Distrib Lumped Obs
13
Distrib Lumped Obs One square = 4 km 2
14
Distrib Lumped Obs
15
One square = 4 km 2 Distrib Lumped Obs
16
Distrib Lumped Obs
17
Distrib Lumped Obs
18
Distrib Lumped Obs
19
Unadjusted routing Adjusted routing Observed Forecast Flood stage Observed Forecast Flood stage
20
Distributed model vs lumped model Distributed model does better in some cases Shape of distributed hydrograph appears to be better Suggestions for hydrologic forecasters Should base forecasts using data from both models
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.