1. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 1

2. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 2

3. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 3

4. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 4

5. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 5

6. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 6

7. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 7

8. Pilot Results from Math Screener- Spring 2006, Grade 8

9. Fall Implementation Manila envelope provided to each pilot teacher –Directions for Administration –Instructions for Scoring –Student Response Sheets –Test Key Copies of student response forms provided to each teacher Every student grades 2-10 were administered the screener

10. Screening Test: Scoring Directions

11. 2006 Fall Data: Grades 2 & 3

12. 2006 Fall Data: Grades 4 & 5

13. 2006 Fall Data: Grades 6 & 7

14. 2006 Fall Data: Grades 8 & 9

15. 2006 Fall Data: Grade 10

16. 2006 Fall Data: All Grades

17. 2007 Winter Data: Grades 1 & 2

18. 2007 Winter Data: Grades 3 & 4

19. 2007 Winter Data: Grades 5 & 6

20. 2007 Winter Data: Grades 7 & 8

21. 2007 Win Data: Grade 9

22. 2007 Win Data: Grade 10

23. 2007 Win Data: All Grades

25. Differences Between Fall and Winter Results Same students, different test Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th percentile) –First grade-No fall data –Second grade Decrease of 16% in computation score Decrease of 16% in application score Decrease of 14% in total score –Third grade Decrease of 12% in computation score –Fourth grade Decrease of 22% in computation score Decrease of 26% in total score

26. Differences Between Fall and Winter Results Same students, different test Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th percentile) –Fifth grade Decrease of 42% in computation score Decrease of 33% in total score –Sixth grade Decrease of 33% in computation score Decrease of 20% in total score –Seventh grade Decrease of 16% in computation score Decrease of 20% in total score –Eight grade Decrease of 33% in computation score Decrease of 66% in application score Decrease of 44% in total score

27. Differences Between Fall and Winter Results Same students, different test Increase or decrease in the median rate (50th percentile) –Ninth grade Decrease of 50% in computation score Decrease of 37% in total score –Tenth grade Increase of 25% in computation score Increase of 50% in application score Increase of 30% in total score

28. 2007 Spring Data: Grades 1 & 2

29. 2007 Spring Data: Grades 3 & 4

30. 2007 Spring Data: Grades 5 & 6

31. 2007 Spring Data: Grades 7 & 8

32. 2007 Spring Data: Grade 9

33. 2007 Spring Data: Grade 10

36. Use of the data What Has Developed This Year With The Assessment Assessment Designed to be a Predictor of Success on the WASL Our hope was to find a diagnostic tool to be the next step Teachers were interested in doing an item analysis for their students At GMS we took it one step farther we did the analysis then split our students into like groups by what problems they missed. During PACE (Practice, Activity, Choice, Enrichment) class we the Skill Supplement to our math curriculum all students are getting extra math support at different levels based on this assessment Groups Whole numbers Fraction concepts Fraction application Geometry Measurement Percent Decimals

37. Next Steps Research a diagnostic assessment that will help w/ developing a program to help students to improve in specific concepts of mathematics –Is it out there? –Try to develop one? What would this assessment model look like

38. Resources DIBELS-http:/dibels.uoregon.edu www.aimsweb.com -Web based CBM system. Passages can be purchased individually at $39 per grade. 30 progress monitoring passages maybe purchased for $139. The entire system can be purchased for $4 per student. CBM Warehouse: http://interventioncentral.org/htmdoc./interventions/cbmware house.shtm Research Institute on Progress Monitoring http://www.progressmonitoring.net/RIPMProducts2.html#ea rly