1. Underway Salinity/Temperature and Moored Temperature Sterling A. Wheaten http://uncw.edu/cmsr/FacilitiesRVcapefear.htm

2. Background: Measurement Stations In both cruises we made various measurements along the Lower Cape Fear estuary at M18, M23, M35, M42, M54, M61, and HB. http://uncw.edu/cmsr/aquaticecology/laboratory/LCFRP/index.htm

3. Background: Continuous Measurements Temperature and Salinity were measured every 5 seconds during both cruises using a Sea-Bird 21 thermosalinograph. http://www.seabird.com/pdf_documents/manuals/21_025.pdf

4. Background: Thermosalinograph Plots TSG plot: September 14, 2009 Cruise 1 TSG plot of Lower Cape Fear Estuary.Septmeber 14, 2009 Y axis: time (in seconds) X axis: Salinity and Temp ( 0 C ) Green line is Temperature Blue line is Salinity

5. Important Concepts: Positioning of Stations Carroll CTD Presentation. 2008

6. Heading up river, salinity decreases Surface temperature stays relatively constant Important Concepts: Positioning of Stations http://uncw.edu/cmsr/aquaticecology/laboratory/LCFRP/index.htm

7. Salinity vs. Time, M18 to HB Data Obtained: Cruise 1 Salinity Time (seconds)

8. Data Obtained: Cruise 1 Data on graph where salinity remained constant implies a stop at a station. This is verified upon comparison to the CTD data, as seen in the next slide.

9. Underway M18 to HB with CTD data Data Obtained: Cruise 1 M18: 30.5 M23: 28.08 M35: 20.05 M42: 17.26 M54: 15.53 M61: 12.72 HB: 6.04 Salinity Time (seconds)

10. Salinity vs. Time, M18 to HB Data Obtained: Cruise 2 Salinity Time (seconds)

11. Underway M18 to HB with CTD data Data Obtained: Cruise 2 M18: 29.12 M23: 26.5 M35: 23.06 M42: 17.45 M54: 15.29 M61: 13.45 HB: 5.98 1.Shorter time to take measurements resulted in the vessel not being as stationary. 2.This data does not correlate as well with the CTD data.

12. Data Obtained: Cruise 1 vs. Cruise 2 Salinity Miles Inland

13. Data Obtained: Cruise 1 vs. Cruise 2 In comparison, Cruise 2 had a lower salinity initially at M18. Station stops during Cruise 2 were much shorter, resulting in less distinction between stations. Cruise 1 had a significant decrease in salinity from M23 to M34 as compared to Cruise 2.

14. Moored Temperature Device at HB A temperature data logger was left at M35 and HB on September 14, 2009 and collected October 26, 2009 (6 weeks) The data logger left at M35 was swept away and could not be found upon collection The instrument used was a TidBit v2 Data Logger precision sensor for ±0.2 °C accuracy Waterproof to 300m Set to record temp. every 15 minutes http://onsetcomp.com/products/data-loggers/utbi-001

15. Moored Temperature Device at HB At left, Dr. Bingham and Sterling prepare the TidBit v2 for mooring and at right, leaving the anchored data logger with buoy attached at station M35. September 14, 2009

16. Moored Temperature Device at HB Above, from clockwise, finding, collecting, and observing the moored TidBit v2 at station HB. October 16, 2009

17. Moored Temperature Device at HB Temperature, °C Data obtained by TidBit v2 at station HB 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 SeptemberOctober 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29

18. Moored Temperature Device at HB There is a large minimum in the temperature around October 20 The decreasing trend in the temperature as time increased was due to seasonal change. The data points oscillate, which are representative of the semidiurnal tide. Data Interpretation

19. Moored Temperature Device: 48 hour period Temperature, o C The oscillations in the data are from the semidiurnal tide. Below shows data obtained from September 17-18, 2009. 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6 12 September 17September 18 ampm am

20. Conclusions: TSG data from both trips showed a decrease in salinity as we headed up river and minimal surface temperature changes. The data from the moored temperature device showed oscillations due to the semidiurnal tide and over the 6 weeks, the temperature followed a decreasing trend due to seasonal change.