1. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 SAVeRS Selection of Appropriate Vehicle Restraint SystemsSAVeRS Selection of Appropriate Vehicle Restraint Systems Prof. Francesca La Torre, PhD, PE Coordinator of the SAVeRS Project Full Professor of Roads, Railways and Airport Engineering University of Florence Civil and Environmental Engineering Department francesca.latorre@unifi.it

2. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Cross-border funded Transnational Research Programme funded by Belgium/Flanders, Germany, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom Cross-border funded Transnational Research Programme funded by Belgium/Flanders, Germany, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom

3. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 SAVeRS Selection of Appropriate Vehicle Restraint SystemsSAVeRS Subcontractor:

4. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Objectives of SAVeRS practical and readily understandable Vehicle Restraint System (VRS) guidance document selection of the most appropriate solution in different road and traffic configurations for all types of VRS The objective of the SAVeRS project is to produce a practical and readily understandable Vehicle Restraint System (VRS) guidance document and a user-friendly web-based tool that will allow the selection of the most appropriate solution in different road and traffic configurations for all types of VRS : safety barriers including parapets, crash cushions (including truck- mounted attenuators), terminals and transitions, motorcycle protection devices.

5. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Workplan of SAVeRS WP0 – Project Management Francesca La Torre (UNIFI) WP0 – Project Management Francesca La Torre (UNIFI) WP1 – Definition of Parameters Gavin Williams (TRL) WP1 – Definition of Parameters Gavin Williams (TRL) TK 1.1 Analysis of NRA methodologies (TRL) [with TCD, UNIFI, VTI, AIT, ZAG, BRRC] TK 1.2 Literature Review (TCD) [with TRL, UNIFI, VTI, AIT, ZAG, BRRC] WP4 – Dissemination and Workshops Bine Pengal (ZAG) [with all] WP4 – Dissemination and Workshops Bine Pengal (ZAG) [with all] WP2 – Influence of Parameters Robert Thomson (VTI) WP2 – Influence of Parameters Robert Thomson (VTI) TK 2.1 Analysis of severity of incidents (AIT) [with UNIFI, TRL, VTI, TCD, ZAG] TK 2.2 Whole life cost analysis (VTI) [with UNIFI, TRL, AIT, TCD, ZAG] WP3 – Creation of the Guidance Document Francesca La Torre (UNIFI) WP3 – Creation of the Guidance Document Francesca La Torre (UNIFI) TK 3.1 – Preparation of the Guideline (UNIFI) [with TRL, VTI, ZAG, AIT, BB] TK 3.2 – Validation of the VRS placement guidance (UNIFI) [with TRL, AIT, BB] TK 3.3 – Pilot application to a project (BB)

6. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Timetable of SAVeRS January 1, 2013 December 31, 2014 Total Budget of 525 k€ (approx. 700 k US$)

7. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 The expected outcome The Guideline will be structured in 5 sections: Identification of the need for a VRS (barrier placement guidance): allow the user to identify if there is a need for a VRS and the LON; Safety barriers (including parapets): provide guidance for selecting the most appropriate VRS, which is tested according to EN1317-2 will be provided in different road section configurations. Crash cushions (including TMAs), terminals and transitions: this section of the guide allow to select the attenuators according to EN1317-3 and the Truck Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) for which a European Technical Specification is still under development and that are currently tested according to the US NCHRP350 or the UK Highways Agency’s TD49/07. Motorcycle restraint systems (MRS): this section of the guideline will provide a tool to identify where an MRS tested according to EN Technical Specification CEN/TS 1317-8 (“Road restraint systems Motorcycle road restraint systems which reduce the impact severity of motorcyclist collisions with safety barriers”) is required and the criteria to select the most appropriate MRS; Recommendation for the implementation of the guideline by National Road Administrations.

8. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 The expected outcome The applicability of the Guide will be tested in a Pilot Project by Balfour Beatty Major Civil Engineering The Guide will be implemented in a user-friendly web-based tool The selection criteria in the Guide will be based also on life cycle principles

9. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 National standards ….. Collect: National standards National guidelines Available database from Road Authorities, police, research institutes, etc… Categorize: Which parameters are used for assessing the need and the type of VRS Which approach are used for assessing the need and the type of VRS Produce: Data Matrix: which essential parameters will be analyzed in WP2 Report part 1.1

10. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Data matrix Example of data matrix (not the actual matrix) One for the need identification and one for the VRS performance selection (for each VRS)

11. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 National standards …..

12. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 National standards …..

13. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 TK1.1 Analysis of National Road Authority methodologies National Requirements from 18 European and 3 non –European countries collated to date….. …but if you are not on the map, we want to hear from you… National standards ….. Gavin Williams - gwilliams@trl.co.ukgwilliams@trl.co.uk Gavin Williams - gwilliams@trl.co.ukgwilliams@trl.co.uk

14. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Literature review ….. Giuseppina Amato - AMATOG@tcd.ieAMATOG@tcd.ie Giuseppina Amato - AMATOG@tcd.ieAMATOG@tcd.ie

15. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 Literature review ….. TAGS:N. papers Safety44 Cost12 Run-Off14 Barriers28 Crash Cushions3 Terminals4 Attenuators5 Transitions2 Motorcyclist6 Third Parties4 Geogr. Cult. etc. Influence3

16. TRB-ERF, 11 April2013 For more details Prof. Francesca La Torre, PhD, PE Coordinator of the SAVeRS Project Full Professor of Roads, Railways and Airport Engineering University of Florence Civil and Environmental Engineering Department francesca.latorre@unifi.it www.saversproject.com