1. Evolutionary Acquisition (EA) Spiral Development (SD) Systems Engineering Methodology NDIA SED Conference 20 October 2003 Richard (Dick) Engwall RLEngwall & Associates

2. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 2 Advanced Development (6.3a/b) Define Gated Process (Methodology) Steps Needs to be Tailored to System Application Based on Business, Induatry, and Technology Risk Scenario IPPD Maturity Model and Self-Assessment Criteria Industry Recommended DoD IPPD Process Entrance Criteria Exit Criteria IPPD Management System IPPD Process Methodology IPPD Teams IPPD Tools Modeling & Simulation Common Operating Digital Environment t Customer(s) Requirements - Multi-use - Dual-use - Top level State-of-the-Art Technology Assessment - Sub-systems - Components - Materials - Processes Identify High Risk and/or Payoff Technologies Needed Establish Metrics of Success Generic Technologies Ready for Integration into New Production Application - ATD product is operationally suitable for use as fieldable prototype - ATD product to be manufactured with production equipment, tooling and processes and tested in real and simulated operational environments Product/Process Capabilities Defined - Producibility Goals - Life Cycle Cost - Reliability & Maintainability - Supportability Materials Characterized Alternative Product/Process Design Tradeoffs Conducted, Evaluated and Prioritized

3. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 3 Evolution of MIL STD 499B to ANSI/EIA 632

4. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 4 The Systems Engineering Building Block Concept

5. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 5 The System Engineering Development Building Block Layers Concept

6. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 6 Sample Layered Development System Structure

7. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 7 ANSI/EIA-632 Process Requirements for Engineering a System

8. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 8 Application Guidelines of ANSI/EIA-632 (What not How Oriented) Decide Which of the 33 Processes Apply Decide Which Requirements Apply for the Processes Selected Establish Appropriate Policies & Procedures Define Appropriate Tasks for Each of the Selected Requirements

9. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 9 Application Guidelines of ANSI/EIA-632 (What not How Oriented) Continued Establish Methods and Tools to Support Task Implementation –Representative Tasks Along With Their Expected Outcomes Are Provided in Annex C Appropriate Processes Are Applied Recursively and Iteratively Many Associate Tasks Are Concurrent And Highly Iterative And Have Interactive Dependencies That Lead To Alteration Of Previously Established Technical Requirements

10. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 10 IOC The ‘Newer’ 5000 MODEL BA Concept & Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Systems Acquisition Operations & Support C User Needs & Technology Opportunities Sustainment Process entry at Milestones A, B, or C Entrance criteria met before entering phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability FRP Decision Review FOC LRIP/OT&E Critical Design Review Pre-Systems Acquisition Concept Exploration Technology Development (Program Initiation) New

11. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 11 Interdependency of DoD 5000 and ANSI/EIA 632 Processes

12. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 12 Concept & Technology Development Phase Enter: Validated & approved ICD Activity: Paper studies of alternative solutions to the initial concept Exit: MDA selects preferred solution to be pursued Concept Exploration Technology Development Enter: Project leader understands solution as part of the integrated architecture and its DOTMLPF implications. Activity: Technology development demonstrations Exit: Affordable increment of military-useful capability identified and demonstrated in relevant environment – normally can be developed for production within 5 years Technology Development Concept Exploration A

13. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 13 Enter: PM has technical solution but has not integrated subsystems into complete system Activities: System Integration of demonstrated subsystems and components. Reduction of integration risk. Exit: Demonstration of prototypes in relevant environment System IntegrationSystem Demonstration Enter: Prototypes demonstrated in intended environment Activities: Complete development. DT/OT/LFT&E Exit: System demonstration in intended environment using engineering development models; meets validated requirements System Demonstration System Integration Critical Design Review System Development & Demonstration Phase B

14. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 14 Enter: System matured for production Activities: Low-rate initial production. IOT&E, LFT&E of production- representative articles. Establish full manufacturing capability. Exit: System operationally effective, suitable and ready for full rate production Full-Rate Production & Deployment LRIP FRP Decision Review Production & Deployment Phase LRIP Enter: Beyond LRIP (ACAT I) and LFT&E reports (covered systems) submitted to Congress Activities: Full rate production. Deploy system. Start support. Exit: Full operational capability; deployment compete Full-Rate Production & Deployment C

15. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 15 Sustainment starts immediately upon fielding or deployment. Activities: Maintain readiness and operational capability of deployed system(s). Execute operational support plans. Conduct modifications and upgrades to hardware and software. Measure customer confidence. Disposal Sustainment Operations & Support Phase Sustainment Demilitarization & Disposal Activities: Demilitarize and dispose of systems IAW legal and regulatory requirements, particularly environmental considerations. Use Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office support, as appropriate. Disposal

16. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 16 EA/SD System Engineering Impact on Information Systems Need to Capture System Information Once in Common Interoperable Format Apply Distributed Tools for Collaborative Assessment & Optimization Including Pervasive Modeling & Simulation Throughout the System Engineering Product Life Cycle Utilize ANSI/EIA-632 Technical Management and Technical Evaluation Processes Throughout the DoD Acquisition Process A Broad, Extensible Representation Approach Is Key –Use EIA-927 Common Data Schema For Complex Systems

17. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 17 Tactical Decision Support Req Elicitation and Analysis Functional Design and Analysis HME / HW / SW Design & Analysis HME / HW / SW Development Training and Ops Support Modification and Upgrade Maintenance and Logistics Requirements Mgmt System Integration and Test Manufacturing & Development Process Cost / Risk / Schedule Management The Complex Systems Tower of Babel System Data Today Stovepiped Tools With Limited Scope and No Substantial Interoperability Multiple Independent Files and Databases With Ad Hoc Manual Configuration Management, Traceability, and Consistency Checking across Domains Most PDM and Enterprise Management Solutions are File Based and Fail to Provide any Useful Integration of the Information Stored in the Files Concept/Tech. Development System Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Operations & Support AB C IOC FOC A B C

18. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 18 A Formal Structure for Representing Spectrum of System Data is needed A Dynamic Schema Provides Means for Accommodating Emerging Data Representation Needs A broad, extensible representation approach is key Oceanographic Common Data and Systems Across the Product Lifecycle

19. CG47 DD963 DDG51 CG47 DD963 DDG51 PLAT SIG/ KINE C 2 COMMSDATA FUSION SENS 1 SENS 2 SENS 3 SENS 4 DRIVERS Concept Exploration & Definition Demonstration / Validation Engineering Manufacturing & Development Production & Deployment Upgrade and Replace nt PHASE Conceptual Development Functional Design MNS ORD SYSTEM CONCEPTS Top Level System Requirements Physical & Info System (HW/SW) Design Cost, Schedule & Program Mgmt Capture System Information Once in Common Interoperable Format and Apply Distributed Tools for Collaborative Assessment and Optimization 1000 100 10 MGMT Jan Apr Jul Oct SBA Concept ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS ADVANCED PLATFORMS ADVANCED SENSORS AND WEAPONS REQ SPEC Logical Structural / HME CONCEPTUAL System Info Repository REQ SPEC Logical Structural / HME CONCEPTUAL System Info Repository REQ SPEC Logical Structural / HME CONCEPTUAL System Info Repository Eng Development & Manufacturing Operations, Logistics & Training Dist Info Repository Test & Eval Distributed Sim Framework

20. Blue systems Threat systems Natural environment Civil/military infrastructure Operational Context (scenarios, etc.) Government provided context information LM Aero provided Product Information Model (DPD) (Variants = layered instance values) Functional allocation trade studies Manufacturing/ supplier capabilities Mobility Specialized views: OML, Cost, BOM, mass properties, etc. Coherency & completeness cross-checks Solid lines = primary Dashed lines = secondary Transportation capabilities Assemblies & components Software Spatial & electrical relationships Connections Part records System/ subsystem topology Functional allocation Technologies Interfaces Air vehicle performance Mission system capabilities Autonomic logistics Signatures Reliability JSF Product Development Information Model (top-level) Lethality/ effectiveness Survivability Manufacturing process Physical architecture (from IPT designers) Support infrastructure Maintainability Performance (from IPT analysts, with gov’t review) Personnel rqmts Interactions (from Kr/gov’t analysts) Logical architecture (from SE/IPT designers) (Requirements are recorded in appropriate information domain) DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited.

21. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 21 Program Management Training Developmental & Operational T&E Manufacturing & Production Detailed Design Prototyping Cost-Performance Trades Requirements Definition Life Cycle Sustainment FCS ACE Enables SMART Field FCS-Equipped Units of Action With Threshold Objective Force Capability by the End of the Decade.

22. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 22 FCS ACE Diagram Color Key Govt Industry Shared Example (i.e. Data) Interface

23. 20Oct03 NDIA SED S3T2 RLEngwall 23 Questions? Contact Dick Engwall: President RLEngwall & Associates 560 Choptank Cove Court Annapolis, Maryland 410 571-8623 rlengwall@aol.com Member NDIA SED, NDIA SED Producibility, M&S, EA/SD, & Supportability Committees; GEIA SS&TC, IT&IC, & EIA-927; AFEI; AIA SMC(exofficio); SME; IIE; WFS; IMTI; LAI