Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNorma Holmes Modified over 9 years ago
1
What CIOs Need to Know
2
Meridith Randall – ACCJC ALO for 17 years for 3 different colleges; never had a college receive a sanction; has written multiple self- evaluations, midterm reports, and FU reports; has served on 4 teams, most recently Oct. 2013 Mary Kay Rudolph --
3
Preparing for the External Team ◦ Ideally, teams are trained a few weeks ahead of the visit -- in reality, some team members may be added late to replace others ◦ Most teams have a couple of CEOs, a CIO, student services personnel, and should have faculty (but may not)
4
Materials used to train/Team Members ◦ Handouts ◦ Team members must draft a great deal of the report based on the self-evaluation ◦ Recently, the first meeting is on Monday, then interviews begin immediately ◦ Depending on the team, interviews may or may not be coordinated ◦ Team members may or may not follow guidelines of professionalism
5
A comfortable room with hard evidence Evidence at the hotel The ability to change interviews frequently Tech support on call Decent food Endless caffeine What is an unreasonable expectation from a team?
6
Anything you identified in your self- evaluation as a problem Anything currently on ACCJC’s radar Any particular interests of the team member The Rubrics
7
Mission Statement (IA) ◦ Some elements to consider: Are intended students identified? Are learning outcomes mentioned or implied? Was development of mission statement inclusive? How is effectiveness assessed? What is cycle to review mission statement? Is it followed? Is the review process inclusive? Can you demonstrate that the mission statement is central to college planning? How is it communicated?
8
Don’t claim you review it regularly if you don’t The proposed standards put more emphasis on using data to prove the college accomplishes its mission Usually reviewed by CEOs on team
9
Key elements: ◦ Dialogue about student learning and processes What hard evidence do you have? What results have come from dialogue? What will your colleagues tell the team?
10
Measurable goals ◦ What was the process to set college goals? ◦ Was it inclusive? Will staff say it was? ◦ Where and how are they used in planning, resource allocation, etc.? ◦ What data is used to show progress toward goals? Planning process Is there broad involvement? Are resources allocated consistent with goals? Have the results of resource allocation been measured?
11
IIA. Instructional Programs ◦ While this is the heart of what we do at the college, most colleges do not get into trouble for Standard II, with a couple of exceptions: SLO assessment and comparable support for online students Allocation of resources to support instruction, library, etc.
12
Must have some kind of program review/vitality assessment process Must assess student learning needs to inform programs Must determine if students meet learning outcomes at all levels, and use results for improvement
13
Must use “delivery systems” that meet student needs and assess their effectiveness Must have a process to determine what is offered as credit, community ed, pre- collegiate, etc. Must have active advisory committees for CTE programs
14
General education should include all components listed in the standard and GELOs should exist and be assessed Must have program elimination process Must publicize student learning assessment results
15
Syllabi must include course SLOs Clock to credit hour standards Emphasis on scheduling in a manner that facilitates student completion Student Support and Library and Learning Support Services are one section
16
Difficult to be sanctioned based on this section Essentially, there is a process to determine support needs and to assess their effectiveness (often through SAOs), including placement, advising, and online services In new standards, catalog requirements are listed in a separate section
17
Need to have sufficient library, computer lab, tutoring and other services as evidenced by regular assessment Must have “comparable services” online and at off-site locations, plus adequate access Must address information competency and assess the students
18
IIC is folded into IIB May or may not indicate a de-emphasis on libraries and learning centers May reflect difficulty in finding librarians to serve on teams CCL has protested the change
19
Technically, not under the CIO area and CIOs would rarely be assigned to this standard Human Resources: should make sure faculty hiring follows a process and all faculty meet MQs As CIO, responsible for regular evaluation of all faculty
20
Current standard: “Faculty…have, as a component of their evaluation, effectiveness in producing…learning outcomes.” What are the ways to address this? New standards: “The evaluation of faculty, academic administrators, and others….includes, as a component…consideration of the effectiveness of producing [student learning].”
21
Must have a “sufficient number of qualified faculty” – will your faculty agree? Must have a process to identify and deliver appropriate professional development for faculty, and evaluate what is provided Must show impact of professional development
22
Physical and Technology Resources: How are needs identified, funded and evaluated? How are allocations connected to college goals and student learning needs? Is technology sufficient for identified student needs? Contractual agreements, particularly with non-accredited entities
23
DE Policy Transfer of Credit Contractual Relationships ERs: Are often cited in sanctions
25
Whatever your process is for planning, assessing SLOs, resource allocation, etc., make sure you can produce DOCUMENTS and show that the process is evaluated regularly and results in changes. Make sure (almost) everyone can tell the team what the processes are AND that they had opportunity for input. Keep evidence that employees were given chances to comment.
26
If you come through a visit with sanctions, it will likely be your fault as the ALO….. But if you are successful, there will be “too many people to thank” Just accept it….
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.