Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLuke O’Connor’ Modified over 9 years ago
1
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia EVALUATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE PRODUCTS UNDER COMPLEX PRECIPITATION REGIMES Augusto J. Pereira Filho 1 Phillip Arkin 2 Phillip Arkin 2 Joe Turk 3 Ricardo Hallak 1 Felipe Vemado 1 Cesar Beneti 4 1 DAC/IAG, University of São Paulo, Brazil 2 ESSIC, University of Maryland, College Park, USA 3 NRL, Marine Meteorology Division, USA 4 SIMEPAR, Paraná, Brazil
2
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia Program for the Evaluation of High Resolution Precipitation Products (PEHRPP) coordinated by ESSIC and NRL. Goal is to compare and to validate these high resolution datasets.
3
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia SPWR RAINFALL ESTIMATES X CMORPH, TRMM, PERSIANN and NRL- BLENDED (m) São Paulo, Brazil.
4
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia SPWR DATASETS: 10/2005 TO 03/2006; SATELLITE PRECIPITATION DATA: 0.25 DEGREE X 3-HOUR; SYSTEM TYPES: COLD FRONT, RAIN BANDS, ORDINARY CONVECTION COLD FRONT, RAIN BANDS, ORDINARY CONVECTION, SQUALL LINES
5
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia EXAMPLES
6
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia COLD FRONT
7
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia RAIN BANDS
8
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia ORDINARY CONVECTION
9
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia 0,1 mm 0,2 mm 1,0 mm 4,0 mm OVERALL RESULTS All data sets available 10/05 to 03/06
10
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia CONCLUSION Coordinate discrepancies;Coordinate discrepancies; Phase and amplitude errors;Phase and amplitude errors; All four methods yielded poor results;All four methods yielded poor results; Radar rainfall accumulation higher than satellite ones;Radar rainfall accumulation higher than satellite ones; Radar data with range effect and other problems;Radar data with range effect and other problems; Best performance for low rainfall accumulation: CMORPH;Best performance for low rainfall accumulation: CMORPH; Best performance for higher accumulation: PERSIANN;Best performance for higher accumulation: PERSIANN; Fewer data for PERSIANN;Fewer data for PERSIANN; All methods are limited;All methods are limited; Need for rain gauges and stream gauges verification.Need for rain gauges and stream gauges verification.
11
3 rd INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP WORKSHOP 23-27 October 2006, Melbourne, Australia THE END Work supported by: FAPESP and CNPq (BRAZIL) FAPESP and CNPq (BRAZIL) NCAR and ESSIC (USA) NCAR and ESSIC (USA)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.