1. INTO THE NEW YEAR January 3, 2007

2. Objectives Reaffirm principles –China’s interest in exploring ESIP structure prompted review of ESIP evolution (more later) Pose issues for the coming year –Crossing the Valley of Death –Advocacy

3. ESIP Federation: Origin* ESIP: another step forward in cooperation –1958 – International Geophysical Year –1960-70s Global Atmospheric Research Program International Decade of Ocean Observation International Biological Program –1980s Earth Observing System (NASA) Global Geoscience initiative (NSF) Climate and Global Change Program (NOAA) *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

4. ESIP Federation: Origin* –1990 – US Global Change Research Program 1.advancing scientific understanding of the global environment; 2.meeting agency-specific missions and responsibilities; and 3.providing reliable scientific information to support national and international decision making I995 – National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Science review USGCRP –Specific focus on EOS Data Information System (EOSDIS) *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

5. ESIP Federation: Origin* NRC findings: technology –EOSDIS was based on 1980s technology Large, complex, hardware system Centrally controlled and operated for quality assurance –Multiple Distributed Active Archive Centers a compromise, but superstructure required for multiple DAACs -- too expensive *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

6. ESIP Federation: Origin* NRC findings: organization and governance –“The EOS program … cannot be successful unless EOSDIS fulfills expectations that it will empower new levels of achievement in the Earth sciences and applications, and in a wide range of activities in both the public and the private sectors.” *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

7. ESIP Federation: Origin* NRC findings: guidance –“To meet these expectations, we must now embrace a revolutionary expansion of the conceptual model that governs the management and operation of the system by affording the scientific community full partnership with shared responsibility.” *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

8. ESIP Federation: Origin* NRC requirements: approach 1.utilize an open management approach in which key decisions are made with community leadership, and assignment of responsibilities is based on peer review; and 2.encourage innovation and creativity through wide participation of the scientific, public, and private sectors. NRC recommendations: create Federation –“Responsibility for product generation, publication, and user services should be held by a federation of partners” *A Review of the U.S. Global Change Research Program and NASA’s Mission to Planet Earth/Earth Observing System. National Academy Press, 1995, 96 pp. http://www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/cover.html

9. NRC-proposed ESIP model: http:// www.gcrio.org/USGCRP/LaJolla/gifs/figf1.gif

10. ESIP evolution: Focus Initially, cooperation focused on cross-cutting topics –Data standards and quality assurance were a primary consideration –Technology for enhancing access to data and information via the web a parallel concern –Education and outreach is key initiative embedded in essentially all Federation activities.

11. ESIP evolution: Focus Interest has emerged in knowledge domains that reflect the growth of the field and parallel the interests represented in GEOSS –Decision support tool development for national applications has been formalized in the creation of ESIP clusters pursued in collaboration with other agencies

12. ESIP legacy: Principles Commitment to the advancement and dissemination of Earth science and its application Cooperation within community –Shared responsibility in development and dissemination of Earth science information products –Inclusiveness (science / public / private) Exploitation of latest technology (focus of this meeting)

13. ESIP Opportunities Advancing and disseminating Earth science and its application Representing the interests of the Earth science community

14. Opportunities: advancing Earth science 2000 2002

15. Joyce, 1993 Research life cycle

16. Joyce, 1993 Example: use of “climax”

17. Adoption of Hybrid Seed Corn Ryan, Bryce, and N.C. Gross. 1943. The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities,” Rural Sociology 8:15-24.

18. Diffusion of Innovation Adoption Life Cycle Time

19. Opportunities: representing community NASA –Looking for community feedback (e.g., Air quality) –Outcomes of Decadal Survey likely to call for more community participation NOAA and other potential partners –All share same needs: Data standards and tools Community input and interaction

20. Issues for the New Year How best to cross the chasm / valley of death and compress the adoption life cycle? –Clusters take the lead? –Direction of partners, current and future? How can we make ESIP a more effective advocate for the Earth science community? –Do we need to re-think organization / structure to make ESIP more effective?