Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing"— Presentation transcript:

1 © Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

2 Metaphysics of mind Substance: needs no other thing to exist Dualism: there are two sorts of substance, mind (or soul) and matter –Mental properties are properties of a mental substance Materialism: there is just one sort of thing, matter –Mental properties are properties of a material substance

3 Materialism and mental properties Substances can have different sorts of properties –Biological: swan –Colour: white –But both physical properties Property dualism: mental properties are not physical properties Hmm…

4 Descartes’ dualism The mind is a separate substance from the body. –What am I? I am a thing that thinks. I cannot doubt this, yet I can doubt whether I have a body. So I can be separated from a body. –The body has parts, the mind has no parts. So they are different kinds of thing.

5 Objections Descartes has not shown that he (the mind) is a substance. Just because Descartes can think of his mind existing without his body, this doesn’t mean that his mind really can exist without his body. Cp. I think the Masked Man robbed the bank; I don’t think my father robbed the bank; Therefore, my father isn’t the Masked Man. We can’t infer real possibility directly from what we can imagine.

6 Mental causation If the mind is just thought, not in space, and matter is just extension, in space, how could one possibly causally affect the other? All physical effects have a sufficient physical cause. Nothing physical happens needs a non-physical explanation. Mental causes would violate the laws of physics, e.g. law of conservation of energy.

7 Jackson’s knowledge argument Mary, a neuroscientist, has never seen colour, but knows all about colour perception Mary doesn’t know what it is like to see red - so, although Mary knows all the physical facts about seeing red, there is a fact (of consciousness) Mary doesn’t know Therefore, properties of consciousness are not physical properties

8 Reply Mary doesn’t learn a new fact, but a new way of thinking about an old fact. She now knows the fact of what happens in the brain through introspection. On concepts and properties: the same fact (the glass contains water) can be thought of in different ways (the glass contains H 2 O).

9 Zombies Zombie (in philosophy, not voodoo!): a physical replica of a person, but without consciousness A zombie has identical physical properties, but different mental properties - therefore mental properties aren’t physical properties Zombies may not be physically possible, but they are logically possible

10 Reply Zombies are not possible - that we can imagine them isn’t enough (see objection to Descartes) Imagine that water is not H 2 O - it seems we can, but in fact, this is impossible –There could be something just like water, but if it isn’t H 2 O, it isn’t water

11 Response The analogy doesn’t work –We make the mistake in the case of water, because we imagine something just like water –There is nothing ‘just like’ a zombie which isn’t a zombie Imagination is a good guide to possibility here - therefore zombies are possible, and property dualism is true


Download ppt "© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google