Download presentation
Published byElfreda Simmons Modified over 9 years ago
1
Examples of Designed Experiments With Nonnormal Responses
SHARON L. LEWIS, DOUGLAS C. MONTGOMERY and RAYMOND H. MYERS Journal of Quality Technology, 33, pp , 2001 演講者: 張秉鈞
2
Outline Introduction Example 1: The Drill Experiment
Example 2: The Windshield Molding Slugging Experiment Conclusion
3
Introduction In general, linear model :
Check model’s three basic assumption 1. Normal probability plot 2. Residuals plot Nonnormal responses 1. data transformations 2. GLM (Generalized Linear Models)
4
Generalized Linear Models
Three components: (1) Response distribution is exponential family (Binomial, Poisson, Gamma, Normal, etc) (2) Linear predictor (3) Link function (relationship between the and )
5
More details: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis
(Chapter 13) Software packages: SAS, S-PLUS Objective: To compare two approaches by designed experiments with nonnormal responses Criterion: Lengths of confidence intervals of mean response
6
The Drill Experiment unreplicated factorial design advance rate
drill load flow rate rotational speed type of drilling mud used GLM: Gamma distribution, log link function
7
Effect Estimates
8
Half -Normal Probability Plot
, and are significant effects data transformation model: GLM model:
9
95% Confidence Interval On the Means
10
The Windshield Molding Slugging Experiment
During the stamping process, debris carried into the die appears as slugs in the product fractional factorial design, and resolution III number of good parts out of 1000 poly-film thickness (0.0025, ) oil mixture (1:20, 1:10) gloves (cotton, nylon) metal blanks (dry underside, oily underside)
11
Design Matrix and Response Data
data transformation: logistic GLM: Binomial distribution, logistic link function
12
Hamada and Nelder (1997) Effect Estimates Std. Err. t Intercept -0.513
0.28 -1.80 2.971 0.46 6.43 -0.270 0.32 -0.84 1.329 2.88 0.351 0.76
13
Refit the Model (GLM) We fit the model with factors
14
95% Confidence Intervals On the Means
17
Conclusion Data transformations may be inappropriate for some situations With the GLM, normality and constant variance are not required With the GLM, length of confidence interval is short
18
References HAMADA, M. and NELDER, J. A. (1997). “Generalized Linear Models for Quality-Improvement Experiments”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY MONTGOMERY, D. C. and PECK, E. A. (1992). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY MYERS, R. H. and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1997). “A Tutorial on Generalized Linear Models”. Journal of Quality Technology 29, pp
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.