1. Microaggressions *The everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostility, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership (Sue, 2010, p.3). Impact is more important than intent. Sue, D.W. (Ed.). (2010). Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact. Hoboken: Wiley.

2. Deliverers…. I do believe that people experience themselves as moral, good, decent, well-intentioned human beings, who may not be conscious of their hidden biases, prejudices, and discriminatory behavior. I also believe that these same people are guilty of enacting microaggressions and should be held accountable to unlearning and reflecting on how to self-monitor the enactment of microaggressions.

3. MICROAGGRESSIONS…. repetitive and ongoing create discomfort, stress, trauma reflect the active manifestation of oppressive world views that create, foster, and enforce marginalization can occur through imposition or deprivation manifest on a continuum from direct/concrete to symbolic or psychological, and unintentional, indirect, and subtle power lies in their invisibility to the perpetrators and oftentimes the recipients

4. Breaking down MA Microaggressions The everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostility, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership Microinsult Unintentional behavioral/verbal remarks that convey rudeness and insensitivity and demean a person’s racial heritage or identity:* i.e., Saying to black athlete at an elite school, do you also speak speak AE ?” Insult: Implying racial quotas* Microassault Conscious and intentional discriminatory actions: i.e., using racial epithets, making fun of someone’s dialect or accent, displaying White supremacist symbols, or swastikas Microinvalidation Verbal comments that exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality:** i.e., “ Chicana/Latina, “Wow, you speak such good English! ” underlying thought/insult, someone who may appear Brown or who has an accent, can’t possibly speak AE well.

5. Black couple is seated next to the kitchen in a restaurant Speaking loudly or slowly to someone with an accent Assertive female is called a bitch Use of word lame or retard Emphasized friendliness Effeminate man is assumed to be gay Assuming that all Asian students will get good grades School lacks a gay-straight alliance Transgender people are not entitled to the same medical benefits for their needs Woman wearing a stethoscope is assumed to be a nurse Assuming that a body which is socially non-conforming is unhealthy or poor Assuming that people with disabilities are asexual or desexualized Helping a blind person across a street Assuming someone is a lesbian because she plays softball or has short hair Common microaggressions

6. Messages may: Invalidate the group identity or experiential reality of target persons; Demean them on a personal or group level, communicate that they are lesser human beings; Suggest they do not belong with the majority group, threaten and intimidate; Relegate them to inferior status and treatment; Force them into a cognitive overload.

7. Consequences: Emotional, Psychological and Physical Trauma Receivers of microaggressions: Are forced to sustain learned or detached tolerance to buffer one’s self against the countless microaggressions experienced throughout a typical day (school); Placate others by representing themselves in incomplete or false ways that they believe will be seen as socially acceptable. Such false fronts or defensive strategies are emotionally and cognitively exhausting and difficult; Imprints them with emotional (C-PTSD) and sometimes physical scars that can last a lifetime; Puts them at risk for health-related problems; Can impact work/athletic concentration “FLOW” and problem solving abilities.**

8. Do now… In groups of 3 discuss the following: Task 1 –Discuss a linguistic microaggression that has been enacted against you. –Conjecture a dominant story/prejudice that was behind the microaggression. –How did you feel as a result? What was the impact? –What do you wish you could tell the person now who perpetuated the microaggression? Task 2 –Name a linguistic microaggression that you enacted against someone else. –What dominant story/prejudice was behind the microaggression? –How did you think the person felt who received the microaggression? –What do you wish you could tell the person now against whom you enacted the microaggression?